Columbia vs. U Chi
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:46 pm
Trying to decide between these two schools. Plan on going into politics/public interest. Finances aside, what's the better option?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=282737
This is accuratexn3345 wrote: Nyc is dirty. The subways are sweaty and make you feel like a mole-person.
Columbia 1L vouching for this.xn3345 wrote:U Chi because clerkships, size, intellectualism, and CoL. Nyc is dirty. The subways are sweaty and make you feel like a mole-person. (Columbia is a great school with a lot of smart people, I'm sure).
If you plan on going into politics, neither. Don't go to law school.Uchi12344 wrote:Plan on going into politics/public interest.
Not that I want to pick a fight over this but I think that really depends on what sort of public interest you want to do. Chicago's clinical offerings are pretty gr8 especially if you're interested in things like police accountability, federal criminal defense, or mental health issues.Nebby wrote:lol, politics
Columbia has superior resources for public interest.
Columbia has a better LRAP. The clinical offers are similar between the two. Columbia also has a better public interest alumni network and access to a much larger public interest market.BlendedUnicorn wrote:Not that I want to pick a fight over this but I think that really depends on what sort of public interest you want to do. Chicago's clinical offerings are pretty gr8 especially if you're interested in things like police accountability, federal criminal defense, or mental health issues.Nebby wrote:lol, politics
Columbia has superior resources for public interest.
Honestly the only two factors that should matter between these two schools are whether you want to be in NY or Chicago and cost.
cavalier1138 wrote:If you plan on going into politics, neither. Don't go to law school.Uchi12344 wrote:Plan on going into politics/public interest.
But if you're actually thinking of practicing law, then go to Chicago. Those guys are weird, and you're weird enough to have started three extremely vague threads on this in the past few days.
Lol. No.BrainsyK wrote:Columbia 1L vouching for this.xn3345 wrote:U Chi because clerkships, size, intellectualism, and CoL. Nyc is dirty. The subways are sweaty and make you feel like a mole-person. (Columbia is a great school with a lot of smart people, I'm sure).
Lol, also you wanna trash the MTA but you think the CTA is any better????jbagelboy wrote:Lol. No.BrainsyK wrote:Columbia 1L vouching for this.xn3345 wrote:U Chi because clerkships, size, intellectualism, and CoL. Nyc is dirty. The subways are sweaty and make you feel like a mole-person. (Columbia is a great school with a lot of smart people, I'm sure).
"Intellectualism"? Get outta here
CTA doesn't turn you into a mole personblerggggg wrote:Lol, also you wanna trash the MTA but you think the CTA is any better????jbagelboy wrote:Lol. No.BrainsyK wrote:Columbia 1L vouching for this.xn3345 wrote:U Chi because clerkships, size, intellectualism, and CoL. Nyc is dirty. The subways are sweaty and make you feel like a mole-person. (Columbia is a great school with a lot of smart people, I'm sure).
"Intellectualism"? Get outta here
One again, nobody should go to law school for the sake of furthering their political careers.Jchance wrote:Columbia b/c of Ivy League--lay prestige--for politics.
This shit is hilarious.--This is like the second time I've seen Rigo come with that response to a poster who's thinking of law as a "come up" for a future in politics. So funny.Rigo wrote:OP is going to end up picking Harvard so let's save our energy.