GULC v UCLA Forum
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
GULC v UCLA
As of this morning, I had it all figured out. I would go to Georgetown because it WAS higher ranked than UCLA and then move back to LA.
THEN the rankings came out and I am SO torn.
I have lived in California my whole life, I went to USC for undergrad, and I plan on living here for pretty much the rest of my life. So it is very important for me to be able to find a job in LA. Before you say it, I know that I should go to school where I want to work but I mean Georgetown isn't some regional school out in the middle of nowhere(no offense to regional schools out in the middle of nowhere). The reason I had my sights set on Georgetown is that I want to experience a different city and hopefully become a well rounded lawyer having been on both coasts. Every time my friends and family urged me to stay and go to UCLA I would cite the rankings, because that was a huge factor. But now I can't justify rankings for my decision because they are tied. Literally, TIED. I mean It would be one thing if UCLA out ranked GULC but, that is not the case.
I'm afraid that I would be making a terrible decision if I went to GULC in regards to job prospects in LA, and on the other hand if I stayed in LA i'd be missing out on a great opportunity to experience something different and out of my comfort zone.
So, please help a girl out with some perfectly rational reasons to pick one over the other!
THEN the rankings came out and I am SO torn.
I have lived in California my whole life, I went to USC for undergrad, and I plan on living here for pretty much the rest of my life. So it is very important for me to be able to find a job in LA. Before you say it, I know that I should go to school where I want to work but I mean Georgetown isn't some regional school out in the middle of nowhere(no offense to regional schools out in the middle of nowhere). The reason I had my sights set on Georgetown is that I want to experience a different city and hopefully become a well rounded lawyer having been on both coasts. Every time my friends and family urged me to stay and go to UCLA I would cite the rankings, because that was a huge factor. But now I can't justify rankings for my decision because they are tied. Literally, TIED. I mean It would be one thing if UCLA out ranked GULC but, that is not the case.
I'm afraid that I would be making a terrible decision if I went to GULC in regards to job prospects in LA, and on the other hand if I stayed in LA i'd be missing out on a great opportunity to experience something different and out of my comfort zone.
So, please help a girl out with some perfectly rational reasons to pick one over the other!
- guynourmin
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
GULC may be the right choice if it is 20-30k cheaper, but it would only be the right choice because it is so much cheaper. You go to law school to get a job as a lawyer, not to experience something new and get out of your comfort zone. Go work in DC for a year or two before law school if you'd like, or go backpack peru this summer if you want a new experience.Motionsinlemons wrote:on the other hand if I stayed in LA i'd be missing out on a great opportunity to experience something different and out of my comfort zone.
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
As of right now I haven't heard back about scholarships for the both of them. UCLA is cheaper at sticker for me because Im a California resident. Also a anything under a 30k overall difference isn't going to make much of a difference for me in the long run.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Which costs more?
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
guybourdin wrote:GULC may be the right choice if it is 20-30k cheaper, but it would only be the right choice because it is so much cheaper. You go to law school to get a job as a lawyer, not to experience something new and get out of your comfort zone. Go work in DC for a year or two before law school if you'd like, or go backpack peru this summer if you want a new experience.Motionsinlemons wrote:on the other hand if I stayed in LA i'd be missing out on a great opportunity to experience something different and out of my comfort zone.
Experience as in advocacy, trial, and procedural style not as in some sort of lifestyle change. I should've been more clear.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dietcoke1
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
please tell us your not planning on paying for either school at sticker with loans.Motionsinlemons wrote:As of right now I haven't heard back about scholarships for the both of them. UCLA is cheaper at sticker for me because Im a California resident. Also a anything under a 30k overall difference isn't going to make much of a difference for me in the long run.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Which costs more?
- trebekismyhero
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Have you asked for money from UCLA or Georgetown? First, ask Georgetown for $, then take that and the acceptance to UCLA for more $.Motionsinlemons wrote:As of right now I haven't heard back about scholarships for the both of them. UCLA is cheaper at sticker for me because Im a California resident. Also a anything under a 30k overall difference isn't going to make much of a difference for me in the long run.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Which costs more?
Rankings don't matter. Employment prospects and COA matter more. And as mentioned, don't go to DC just to experience a different city
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Quit looking at the rankings. Below HYS, the next 10 schools are all peers. Consider regional prestige, and pick the cheapest school in your desired employment region.
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
dietcoke1 wrote:please tell us your not planning on paying for either school at sticker with loans.Motionsinlemons wrote:As of right now I haven't heard back about scholarships for the both of them. UCLA is cheaper at sticker for me because Im a California resident. Also a anything under a 30k overall difference isn't going to make much of a difference for me in the long run.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Which costs more?
lol ABSOLUTELY NOT.
- floatie
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2016 3:39 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Law school isn't the time to try out a new city, going to school on a different coast doesn't make you a well-rounded lawyer, and USNWR rankings are largely meaningless.
If you want to live in and work in California, go to UCLA. If you want to "try out" a new coast by spending some time in DC, do a summer internship.
If you want to live in and work in California, go to UCLA. If you want to "try out" a new coast by spending some time in DC, do a summer internship.
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:47 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Regardless of the rankings, GULC and UCLA are basically tied for biglaw/fedclerkship placement - roughly top half of the class. However, since you're LA or bust, the bottom half at UCLA probably gets better connections to that market than the bottom half at GULC.
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
floatie wrote:Law school isn't the time to try out a new city, going to school on a different coast doesn't make you a well-rounded lawyer, and USNWR rankings are largely meaningless.
If you want to live in and work in California, go to UCLA. If you want to "try out" a new coast by spending some time in DC, do a summer internship.
The thing is, I've heard that the trial attorneys on the east coast have a different style than west coast attorneys and that is largely because of the legal environment there, so that is the rational behind "trying out" a new city. I want to have a diverse set of trial skills.
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
I would assume so, but any insight as to the top half? Would they take someone at the top 10% of Georgetown over someone at the top 10% of UCLA?goldenbear2020 wrote:Regardless of the rankings, GULC and UCLA are basically tied for biglaw/fedclerkship placement - roughly top half of the class. However, since you're LA or bust, the bottom half at UCLA probably gets better connections to that market than the bottom half at GULC.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Precisely. The next 10 schools after HYS. Georgetown has fallen from grace, and it is our duty to shun them.saf18hornet wrote:Quit looking at the rankings. Below HYS, the next 10 schools are all peers. Consider regional prestige, and pick the cheapest school in your desired employment region.
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 10:08 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
A random shift in rankings should play absolutely zero role in your decision process. 99 percent of hiring partners are likely unaware this even happened (and if they did know, they probably wouldn't care).
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: GULC v UCLA
A different style isn't the same as different skills. To the extent that the style thing is true, if you go to Georgetown and learn east coast style you're going to have to just relearn the west coast style when you go back and practice there.Motionsinlemons wrote:floatie wrote:Law school isn't the time to try out a new city, going to school on a different coast doesn't make you a well-rounded lawyer, and USNWR rankings are largely meaningless.
If you want to live in and work in California, go to UCLA. If you want to "try out" a new coast by spending some time in DC, do a summer internship.
The thing is, I've heard that the trial attorneys on the east coast have a different style than west coast attorneys and that is largely because of the legal environment there, so that is the rational behind "trying out" a new city. I want to have a diverse set of trial skills.
So you should probably go to UCLA.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Blasphemy!AZ123 wrote:A random shift in rankings should play absolutely zero role in your decision process. 99 percent of hiring partners are likely unaware this even happened (and if they did know, they probably wouldn't care).
Seriously, OP: if you'd asked the same question three days ago, you would have been told to go to the cheaper school. You should still do that.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
cavalier1138 wrote:Blasphemy!AZ123 wrote:A random shift in rankings should play absolutely zero role in your decision process. 99 percent of hiring partners are likely unaware this even happened (and if they did know, they probably wouldn't care).
Seriously, OP: if you'd asked the same question three days ago, you would have been told to go to the cheaper school. You should still do that.
You do make a pretty good point there. I guess you're right. I'll wait for scholarship info and take the path of the least amount of loans.
- quiver
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Yeah, I'm not really sure what OP is referencing here. But to the extent there are different "styles", you won't be learning that in law school anyway. As others have said, you can do a summer internship in DC if you want to check out the "legal atmosphere" on the east coast.A. Nony Mouse wrote:A different style isn't the same as different skills. To the extent that the style thing is true, if you go to Georgetown and learn east coast style you're going to have to just relearn the west coast style when you go back and practice there.Motionsinlemons wrote:floatie wrote:Law school isn't the time to try out a new city, going to school on a different coast doesn't make you a well-rounded lawyer, and USNWR rankings are largely meaningless.
If you want to live in and work in California, go to UCLA. If you want to "try out" a new coast by spending some time in DC, do a summer internship.
The thing is, I've heard that the trial attorneys on the east coast have a different style than west coast attorneys and that is largely because of the legal environment there, so that is the rational behind "trying out" a new city. I want to have a diverse set of trial skills.
So you should probably go to UCLA.
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
[/quote]Yeah, I'm not really sure what OP is referencing here. But to the extent there are different "styles", you won't be learning that in law school anyway. As others have said, you can do a summer internship in DC if you want to check out the "legal atmosphere" on the east coast.[/quote]
Court room styles. Trial court.
You do learn that in law school if you do the right clinics and get the right extern and internship.
One summer isn't enough to get full breadth of how they do things there.
But, I've decided ill go with the cheaper school.
Court room styles. Trial court.
You do learn that in law school if you do the right clinics and get the right extern and internship.
One summer isn't enough to get full breadth of how they do things there.
But, I've decided ill go with the cheaper school.
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Court room styles. Trial court.quiver wrote:Yeah, I'm not really sure what OP is referencing here. But to the extent there are different "styles", you won't be learning that in law school anyway. As others have said, you can do a summer internship in DC if you want to check out the "legal atmosphere" on the east coast.A. Nony Mouse wrote:A different style isn't the same as different skills. To the extent that the style thing is true, if you go to Georgetown and learn east coast style you're going to have to just relearn the west coast style when you go back and practice there.Motionsinlemons wrote:floatie wrote:Law school isn't the time to try out a new city, going to school on a different coast doesn't make you a well-rounded lawyer, and USNWR rankings are largely meaningless.
If you want to live in and work in California, go to UCLA. If you want to "try out" a new coast by spending some time in DC, do a summer internship.
The thing is, I've heard that the trial attorneys on the east coast have a different style than west coast attorneys and that is largely because of the legal environment there, so that is the rational behind "trying out" a new city. I want to have a diverse set of trial skills.
So you should probably go to UCLA.
You do learn that in law school if you do the right clinics and get the right extern and internship.
One summer isn't enough to get full breadth of how they do things there.
But, I've decided ill go with the cheaper school.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: GULC v UCLA
Yeah, I'm not really sure what OP is referencing here. But to the extent there are different "styles", you won't be learning that in law school anyway. As others have said, you can do a summer internship in DC if you want to check out the "legal atmosphere" on the east coast.[/quote]Motionsinlemons wrote:
Court room styles. Trial court.
You do learn that in law school if you do the right clinics and get the right extern and internship.
One summer isn't enough to get full breadth of how they do things there.
But, I've decided ill go with the cheaper school.[/quote]
But different styles don't matter because you're going to be expected to practice the way it's done wherever you are.
- Motionsinlemons
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:24 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Court room styles. Trial court.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Yeah, I'm not really sure what OP is referencing here. But to the extent there are different "styles", you won't be learning that in law school anyway. As others have said, you can do a summer internship in DC if you want to check out the "legal atmosphere" on the east coast.Motionsinlemons wrote:
You do learn that in law school if you do the right clinics and get the right extern and internship.
One summer isn't enough to get full breadth of how they do things there.
But, I've decided ill go with the cheaper school.[/quote]
But different styles don't matter because you're going to be expected to practice the way it's done wherever you are.[/quote]
That is true to some extent but from what I've seen of the trial attorneys I would hope to be like they strike a balance between the two and it is very effective, usually. Tbh the whole east coast thing was advice from them which is why I am giving it so much weight in comparison to the benefits of going to a regional LA school.
- quiver
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
For the record, you're talking to practicing attorneys here too. I am still unclear on what specifically you're referencing with regard to "style", but more to the point of your thread, just go to the cheaper school.
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: GULC v UCLA
Why aren't you considering Michigan?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login