If his parents are holding him back from law school he is just not mature enough for law school or this field. He said his brother + other family members all went to law school, so maybe his parents are "forcing" him to go. Taking LSAT twice means he probably hasn't spent a year or two working full time yet either. OP please correct me is this assumption is wrong.LandMermaid wrote:A) You are an adult. .zimryan wrote:
This is the best I have, and my parents/my situation dictates that I plan on starting law school this year.
This isn't a time to be shy here, what EXACTLY is the "situation" stopping you from taking the LSAT again. All of us on this forum are in law schools (from Harvard to TTTs) or already practicing law (from biglaw to shitlaw). You do not know more about this than us. You don't. You really really don't. There better be a damn good reason why you aren't listening to us and at least considering retaking. Two times is nothing.
Some of the most successful people at my law school are those who took the LSAT twice, tanked it, then decided to go do other work for a few years. After they retook and did fine, they got good schollys and went to good schools. It built character, showed maturity, and showed later legal employers that law wasn't just a fallback career for a K-JD history major.
Edit: to make it clear OP. If you are just too afraid to go out and find a job to live independently for a year outside of your parent's help, you are not ready for law school. A J.D. is a professional degree.
You have not told anyone here a good reason for saying "I'm not retaking" other than "personal situation". Either it is something really serious or you are way too immature to realize how little taking an extra year of matters in a career 40+ years long.