Deleted
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:34 am
Post removed.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=260616
From what I've learned on these forums, D.C. is really hard to get no matter what school you go to. So I wouldn't bank on say, D.C. Biglaw, from anywhere, even gtwn. ***Disclaimer: I have no idea what type of boost your undergrad background would have, so I may be wrong.***speedsta247 wrote:Hi y'all
I'm struggling to make an objective comparison between the aforementioned schools, so I thought I'd open it up to discussion. Thanks in advance.
I've lived nearly my whole life in Texas, and I enjoy the warm weather and low cost of living, but the prospect of staying in-state for my whole career is a bit daunting. I also like DC and Cali, but I'm not interested in moving northeast to Boston or NYC (too cold).
I wouldn't be taking on any debt to attend any of these schools.
Want to do IP law (BME major from Top 2 BME program), and I believe Austin, Cali, and DC are all suppose to be good tech hubs. I don't have significant work experience as an engineer, nor do I have an advanced engineering degree, so I have been led to assume that this means I wouldn't be able to do a whole lot of patent prosecution work (at least at certain big firms), but I guess that's a discussion for a different thread.
Essentially, I'm curious if there's any difference in perceived employment prospects at the cusp of T14. Is this a "go wherever feels best" situation, or is there a clear favorite among the choices listed?
Thanks for your help. Sorry I rambled.
EDIT: Also, if it helps, I'm just one year out of undergrad. Been working as an intern at a law firm to get a feel for the business. Sort of interested in the national v. regional employment prospects of these schools. UCLA and Texas seem to put most grads in-state, but I'm wondering if that's mostly because those students were planning to stay in state.