UVA v. Berkeley
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:41 am
Money aside, which school takes the cake? I am interested in clerking and biglaw. I am not partial to either location.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=260038
Probably Chicago, NYC or DCurbanist11 wrote:They are peers. Where do you want to work?
Probably UVA then, but either one is defensible. As said they're peer schools. If money didn't matter, I would pick the one I would like being at the most for 3 years. Unless DC was your number 1 destination choice, then UVA would get a bigger bumpcaptainamerica wrote:Probably Chicago, NYC or DCurbanist11 wrote:They are peers. Where do you want to work?
If Chicago try for northwestern or UChicago. If nyc I get the sense (0L, feel free to correct) it doesn't matter as much but Cornell/Columbia/nyu are good options. If dc, I'd pick UVA. Berkeley can place nationally of course but you'll likely be paying more to go there which doesn't make sense if you don't want to practice on the west coast.captainamerica wrote:Probably Chicago, NYC or DCurbanist11 wrote:They are peers. Where do you want to work?
urbanist11 wrote:If Chicago try for northwestern or UChicago. If nyc I get the sense (0L, feel free to correct) it doesn't matter as much but Cornell/Columbia/nyu are good options. If dc, I'd pick UVA. Berkeley can place nationally of course but you'll likely be paying more to go there which doesn't make sense if you don't want to practice on the west coast.captainamerica wrote:Probably Chicago, NYC or DCurbanist11 wrote:They are peers. Where do you want to work?
Why are you only considering these two schools? I'd try to narrow down your preferred market because it makes a big difference in the advice people will give you.
This is surprising. I had thought that NYC was pretty much the most open of markets to the T-14. So, the ~20% of UVA grads who landed in NYC are reflective not of self selection, but of a bunch more grads who couldn't get a job there?krads153 wrote:NYC - probably can get from either
DC/Chicago - probably won't get from either unless you are closer to top of the class
I would say $$$ should be the most important factor.
I think maybe you misreadfliptrip wrote:This is surprising. I had thought that NYC was pretty much the most open of markets to the T-14. So, the ~20% of UVA grads who landed in NYC are reflective not of self selection, but of a bunch more grads who couldn't get a job there?krads153 wrote:NYC - probably can get from either
DC/Chicago - probably won't get from either unless you are closer to top of the class
I would say $$$ should be the most important factor.
Oooooops. Total RC fail. I'll go back into my shed in the woods now. LOL, thanks.urbanist11 wrote:I think maybe you misreadfliptrip wrote:This is surprising. I had thought that NYC was pretty much the most open of markets to the T-14. So, the ~20% of UVA grads who landed in NYC are reflective not of self selection, but of a bunch more grads who couldn't get a job there?krads153 wrote:NYC - probably can get from either
DC/Chicago - probably won't get from either unless you are closer to top of the class
I would say $$$ should be the most important factor.
True that.BruceWayne wrote:Where are you from ? One thing that I think is a decent consideration when you have two even choices and neither places especially better in the markets you want is to think about where you are from. Consider going to the school that isn't in the region you are from (because you will probably be able to sell yourself in your home region regardless) but is located in a market where you don't have ties but could consider yourself living. While 2 of the markets you want are going to be logistically easier from UVA (DC and NYC) they aren't markets that are especially difficult to break into in terms of being biased about where you are from or the location of your school assuming it's a top school (and both of these are). With that being said, if you ever decided that you wanted to work in California, that is a market that is going to HEAVILY prefer Boalt grads to UVA alums. Just something to consider. People's interested/tastes often change over time/during law school.
But this is unlikely unless OP has parental/family support. I think UVA is more generous with scholarship and there's a huge COL difference.Budfox55 wrote:Dude...those are two very different schools. Yea they're both very good public schools with huge DI sports programs, but that's probably where their cultural similarities end. Berkley and Charlottseville are also very different from each other. If the money ends up being equal and at the end of your cycle you're still deciding between these two, you should probably try to really research the culture of both schools and see which one is a better fit.
I disagree to some extent. I mean, sure, if you love the culture at Berkeley and want to live in the Bay Area, but are offered $100,000 at UVA, I think you'd be a fool to turn it down. At the same time, you will be spending three years of your life in the town you choose to live in, and happiness is worth something (to the extent you think you'd be happy in one place vis a vis the other). It's certainly not silly to turn down, say, a $10k/year scholarship at UVA if you want to live near San Francisco or vice versa if you want to live in Charlottesville. Only you can determine where the cutoff point is and what level of happiness each place could potentially bring.And if money isn't equal, always go with the money even if you like the culture of the other better.
I would have agreed with you before I started working, but honestly even a $30k loan (which is probably more like 35k upon repayment) means the difference between working one more year in biglaw or not. So think of it in the context of time rather than material goods.SLS_AMG wrote:I disagree to some extent. I mean, sure, if you love the culture at Berkeley and want to live in the Bay Area, but are offered $100,000 at UVA, I think you'd be a fool to turn it down. At the same time, you will be spending three years of your life in the town you choose to live in, and happiness is worth something (to the extent you think you'd be happy in one place vis a vis the other). It's certainly not silly to turn down, say, a $10k/year scholarship at UVA if you want to live near San Francisco or vice versa if you want to live in Charlottesville. Only you can determine where the cutoff point is and what level of happiness each place could potentially bring.And if money isn't equal, always go with the money even if you like the culture of the other better.
jbagelboy wrote:The people I know at UVA loathe living in Charlottesville. So much so that they transferred or studied abroad or spend every thursday-sunday in DC.
But others love it. So, idk.
I would do Berkeley at equal cost every time, but UVA tends to be more generous, and if its substantially cheaper I'd bite the geography bullet and move to virginia for a bit
Actually, a lot of the parts of Oakland that are adjacent to Berkeley (like Rockridge/Elmwood) are pretty nice. And of course the heart of SF is a 20-minute BART ride away.fliptrip wrote:jbagelboy wrote:The people I know at UVA loathe living in Charlottesville. So much so that they transferred or studied abroad or spend every thursday-sunday in DC.
But others love it. So, idk.
I would do Berkeley at equal cost every time, but UVA tends to be more generous, and if its substantially cheaper I'd bite the geography bullet and move to virginia for a bitIronically, UVA just sent us admits a nice long email about how terrific it is to live in Charlottesville. It doesn't shock me in the least that Berkeley is better than C'ville, but I mean, Berkeley is completely adjacent to Oakland, and that place ain't nothing nice.
Oakland is where all the interesting, broke people from SF fled to. It's practically cooler than SF at this point. Uptown, Adams Point, Grand Lake, Temescal, etc. may as well be Brooklyn.fliptrip wrote:jbagelboy wrote:The people I know at UVA loathe living in Charlottesville. So much so that they transferred or studied abroad or spend every thursday-sunday in DC.
But others love it. So, idk.
I would do Berkeley at equal cost every time, but UVA tends to be more generous, and if its substantially cheaper I'd bite the geography bullet and move to virginia for a bitIronically, UVA just sent us admits a nice long email about how terrific it is to live in Charlottesville. It doesn't shock me in the least that Berkeley is better than C'ville, but I mean, Berkeley is completely adjacent to Oakland, and that place ain't nothing nice.