Detailed T14 Clerkship Data? Forum
- oliverotis
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:18 pm
Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
There's lots of available data on T14 fed clerkship placements through c/o 2014, but I haven't seen any kind of breakdown on (e.g.) Dist vs. CoA placement. Does this exist anywhere and/or does anyone have insight? Seems like not all schools' clerkship % is created equal, and I've heard (anecdotally) that, for example, S might place more students into fed clerkships than H, but they tend to be lower quality (presumably, higher % Dist). I'm skeptical about that claim, but would love to see some data on this if it exists.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
- oliverotis
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:18 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
So should 9 mo clerkship data be taken at face value (e.g., Stanford at 30% really is 2X better than HLS at 15%, or Berkeley at 15% = HLS at 15%)?jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
I know this is an oversimplification, but humor me...
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
This is not accurate. As far as determining whether a school with lower raw placement is getting higher quality placement--that's nearly impossible to tell.jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
It's absolutely accurate. Whether, e.g., more HLS students clerked with district court judges relative to COA than SLS students tells you nothing about how many will ultimately clerk on COA since so many of the district court clerks will find themselves at the appellate level the following year.daleearnhardt123 wrote:This is not accurate. As far as determining whether a school with lower raw placement is getting higher quality placement--that's nearly impossible to tell.jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
Even at the very highest level--feeders to SCOTUS--many have district court clerkships prior to their COA. And as you drift away from feeders, the practice of starting with a district judge only becomes more frequent. Many circuit judges now have explicit hiring policies where they recruit with the understanding that a d ct clerkship be completed prior.
At the end of the day, when talking about T6/top law school clerkship data, its not particulary meaningful to parse at the 9mo mark since the action takes place so many years out from graduation now. This wasn't true even 2-3 yrs ago but it certainly is now.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Clemenceau
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
I think if you look at the 5 year numbers then you'll see 15% is a low year for hls and a really good year for berk, fwiwoliverotis wrote:So should 9 mo clerkship data be taken at face value (e.g., Stanford at 30% really is 2X better than HLS at 15%, or Berkeley at 15% = HLS at 15%)?jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
I know this is an oversimplification, but humor me...
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
No, it shouldn't.oliverotis wrote:So should 9 mo clerkship data be taken at face value (e.g., Stanford at 30% really is 2X better than HLS at 15%, or Berkeley at 15% = HLS at 15%)?jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
I know this is an oversimplification, but humor me...
Anyone who has been through the clerkship hiring process and secured one or multiple positions -- other than the very few cherry picked for a handful of early feeders-- knows that this data is highly deceptive and cannot be taken at face value. If you know you want to litigate and having an experience in chambers is important to you, procure detailed information fromthe clerkship office of whatever school you're looking at (data that includes alumni clerks and the breakdown of which circuits and districts). Otherwise the only probative value is in conjunction with firm statistics as a general measure of placement into advantageous positions.
- oliverotis
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:18 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
Yep, aware of this for sure. Tks for the heads up though.Clemenceau wrote:I think if you look at the 5 year numbers then you'll see 15% is a low year for hls and a really good year for berk, fwiwoliverotis wrote:So should 9 mo clerkship data be taken at face value (e.g., Stanford at 30% really is 2X better than HLS at 15%, or Berkeley at 15% = HLS at 15%)?jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
I know this is an oversimplification, but humor me...
- oliverotis
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:18 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
Thanks, makes sense. Biglaw data isn't super helpful for me, in part because I'm shooting for bigfed / PI litigation, and because I think it reflects more self selection / institutional culture than clerkship data (compare, for example, Columbia vs UChi or Penn vs. UVA/Berk). That being said, plenty of clerkship self selection too, esp at UChi for examplejbagelboy wrote:No, it shouldn't.oliverotis wrote:So should 9 mo clerkship data be taken at face value (e.g., Stanford at 30% really is 2X better than HLS at 15%, or Berkeley at 15% = HLS at 15%)?jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
I know this is an oversimplification, but humor me...
Anyone who has been through the clerkship hiring process and secured one or multiple positions -- other than the very few cherry picked for a handful of early feeders-- knows that this data is highly deceptive and cannot be taken at face value. If you know you want to litigate and having an experience in chambers is important to you, procure detailed information fromthe clerkship office of whatever school you're looking at (data that includes alumni clerks and the breakdown of which circuits and districts). Otherwise the only probative value is in conjunction with firm statistics as a general measure of placement into advantageous positions.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2015 1:20 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
Seems like the best way is too look at both federal clerkships and SCOTUS clerkships (see below). If anyone finds CoA data, that would be very interesting.oliverotis wrote:There's lots of available data on T14 fed clerkship placements through c/o 2014, but I haven't seen any kind of breakdown on (e.g.) Dist vs. CoA placement. Does this exist anywhere and/or does anyone have insight? Seems like not all schools' clerkship % is created equal, and I've heard (anecdotally) that, for example, S might place more students into fed clerkships than H, but they tend to be lower quality (presumably, higher % Dist). I'm skeptical about that claim, but would love to see some data on this if it exists.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=256943
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
At some schools, current students have access to detailed data.
- oliverotis
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:18 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
Sample size is too small for SCOTUS data to be very meaningful outside of HYSC IMOObiWahooKenobi wrote:Seems like the best way is too look at both federal clerkships and SCOTUS clerkships (see below). If anyone finds CoA data, that would be very interesting.oliverotis wrote:There's lots of available data on T14 fed clerkship placements through c/o 2014, but I haven't seen any kind of breakdown on (e.g.) Dist vs. CoA placement. Does this exist anywhere and/or does anyone have insight? Seems like not all schools' clerkship % is created equal, and I've heard (anecdotally) that, for example, S might place more students into fed clerkships than H, but they tend to be lower quality (presumably, higher % Dist). I'm skeptical about that claim, but would love to see some data on this if it exists.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=256943
ETA: also making a decision based even partly on SCOTUS placement seems sort of ridiculous IMO
- bruinfan10
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
one caveat, bagelbro, is that your school's location in the Second Circuit might skew your perception a little--although the Second Circuit largely hires clerks with prior experience (e.g. SDNY or EDNY clerkships, although they pull from other places too), many if not most other circuits hire CoA clerks straight from law school. I interviewed with a lot of the top boutiques that heavily recruit clerks, and it's surprisingly uncommon for people to have two clerkships (not counting SCOTUS clerks--those folks obviously do always have a prior clerkship).jbagelboy wrote:It's absolutely accurate. Whether, e.g., more HLS students clerked with district court judges relative to COA than SLS students tells you nothing about how many will ultimately clerk on COA since so many of the district court clerks will find themselves at the appellate level the following year.daleearnhardt123 wrote:This is not accurate. As far as determining whether a school with lower raw placement is getting higher quality placement--that's nearly impossible to tell.jbagelboy wrote:It wouldn't matter since most people that do COA clerkships do district court clerkships or fellowships first. So the 9mo employment data doesn't capture anything meaningful b/t d.ct. and COA.
Even at the very highest level--feeders to SCOTUS--many have district court clerkships prior to their COA. And as you drift away from feeders, the practice of starting with a district judge only becomes more frequent. Many circuit judges now have explicit hiring policies where they recruit with the understanding that a d ct clerkship be completed prior.
At the end of the day, when talking about T6/top law school clerkship data, its not particulary meaningful to parse at the 9mo mark since the action takes place so many years out from graduation now. This wasn't true even 2-3 yrs ago but it certainly is now.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Vursz
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:31 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
This is true - oftentimes it's not run through the career office, though, but maintained unofficially. Ask student organization leaders at the schools you're considering.RetakeFrenzy wrote:At some schools, current students have access to detailed data.
A couple thoughts on other things from this thread: more and more COA judges are hiring early (even non-"feeder" judges). I checked our school's data today after reading this thread, and at least 13% of my class already has a COA clerkship lined up. Additionally, many district judges now seem to be wanting a COA clerkship beforehand (it's no longer atypical to go COA-D.Ct.).
(In short, bruinfan is correct)
- bruinfan10
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
I wouldn't say "many" want a prior CoA, but a few DJs do have that as a requirement. And having a prior CoA gig does make getting a d.ct job in the competitive districts a lot easier. TBH, I think the district court job is objectively a lot harder, it'd make sense if district judges started placing more and more emphasis on prior experience--CoA is incredibly similar to law school, much easier to do without legal experience.Vursz wrote:This is true - oftentimes it's not run through the career office, though, but maintained unofficially. Ask student organization leaders at the schools you're considering.RetakeFrenzy wrote:At some schools, current students have access to detailed data.
A couple thoughts on other things from this thread: more and more COA judges are hiring early (even non-"feeder" judges). I checked our school's data today after reading this thread, and at least 13% of my class already has a COA clerkship lined up. Additionally, many district judges now seem to be wanting a COA clerkship beforehand (it's no longer atypical to go COA-D.Ct.).
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
I'll grant that I was wrong to say "most" but I'll also point out that many law students don't attend Yale. It's not just 2nd circuit judges that often take students who have some other relevant experience, but many 1st circuit, DC, and 7th as well (in other words, outside of the 9th circuit, the most desirable). This is becoming more and more true strictly from a timing perspective: consider, if a judge is interviewing 2Ls for fall 2018 positions (a cursory glance at OSCAR confirms there are plenty), they assume the student will be working either for another judge, at a firm, or pursuing a fellowship in the interim. Maybe it's rare that a prior clerkship is an explicit requirement, but when the recruiting season is so accelerated its an implicit reality.
What we all seem to agree about is that a distribution of district and circuit court judges by the current available data that does not count alumni wouldn't tell us anything of value, for a number of reasons: some COA judges expect a district court first, some hire so far out that the clerk must pursue other opportunities in the meantime, sometimes the district judge might actually be more competitive/desirable than the COA (for example, clerking for judge thapar is probably a better signaler to SCOTUS than starting with most circuit judges), sometimes the order is reversed, and any number of other reasons.
What we all seem to agree about is that a distribution of district and circuit court judges by the current available data that does not count alumni wouldn't tell us anything of value, for a number of reasons: some COA judges expect a district court first, some hire so far out that the clerk must pursue other opportunities in the meantime, sometimes the district judge might actually be more competitive/desirable than the COA (for example, clerking for judge thapar is probably a better signaler to SCOTUS than starting with most circuit judges), sometimes the order is reversed, and any number of other reasons.
- First Offense
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: Detailed T14 Clerkship Data?
Clerkship data is tough. A lot of people work for a year, a not-insignificant number of people clerk for two years (I know quite a few people with two COA clerkships lined up, or with D. Ct. + COA lined up). 9 months out numbers are a decent proxy, but you can probably expect some of those to bump 1 or 2 points as an actual number of people that clerk based on those factors.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login