LSAT 167, GPA 3.9 Where can i go?
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:19 am
LSAT 167
GPA 3.9/4.0
Will I be able to apply for T14 ?
Thanks,
GPA 3.9/4.0
Will I be able to apply for T14 ?
Thanks,
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=250805
This. Check out mylsn.info for more info.Mack.Hambleton wrote:To lsac.org to schedule a retake
I would like to retake but I am a little bit scared. So is it okay to get a lower score?shump92 wrote:If you cannot score higher you are going to need a lot from softs, which can happen. Though realistically one of the pushing factors would have to be URM or solid WE. If you lack both of those then work really hard on those essays and make sure your LORs are fantastic. You would get into some of the lower ones probably but a lot closer to sticker than is ideal.
Why are you scared of an exam? you already did good with a 167, just add 2-3 more points and have a better cycle I don't see why you would have anything to fear have some confidence in your abilities you got a great GPA so you're obviously smartchestnut90 wrote:I would like to retake but I am a little bit scared. So is it okay to get a lower score?shump92 wrote:If you cannot score higher you are going to need a lot from softs, which can happen. Though realistically one of the pushing factors would have to be URM or solid WE. If you lack both of those then work really hard on those essays and make sure your LORs are fantastic. You would get into some of the lower ones probably but a lot closer to sticker than is ideal.
Only retake when you know you will get a higher score. Tons of threads here offer studying advice.chestnut90 wrote:I would like to retake but I am a little bit scared. So is it okay to get a lower score?shump92 wrote:If you cannot score higher you are going to need a lot from softs, which can happen. Though realistically one of the pushing factors would have to be URM or solid WE. If you lack both of those then work really hard on those essays and make sure your LORs are fantastic. You would get into some of the lower ones probably but a lot closer to sticker than is ideal.
I agree that retaking is the best idea here, but I can't help but laugh at this comment. If you're graduating with six figure debt from Y/S (and I don't know - maybe you're not), you're still just as screwed as the next person. Going to law school is not some 'life changing" experience at all - it's not like winning the lottery/getting rich.Plainsman11011 wrote:Retake.
The classic TLS refrain. It used to annoy me so much pre-law school to see that inevitably posted in response to a 0L. But OP, you MUST retake. I had a 167/3.9 (admittedly with pretty good softs) and had gotten D/M/V/Gtown -- after a retake I ended up at Y/S. A retake from your exact position (more or less) literally changed my life.
Schools DO NOT care about multiple LSAT scores. Anyone who tells you otherwise is wrong. Good luck OP! Study hard.
Graduating with 6 figure debt from Y vs. 6 figure debt from MIchigan or Cornell definitely qualifies as "changed my life" material.krads153 wrote:I agree that retaking is the best idea here, but I can't help but laugh at this comment. If you're graduating with six figure debt from Y/S (and I don't know - maybe you're not), you're still just as screwed as the next person. Going to law school is not some 'life changing" experience at all - it's not like winning the lottery/getting rich.Plainsman11011 wrote:Retake.
The classic TLS refrain. It used to annoy me so much pre-law school to see that inevitably posted in response to a 0L. But OP, you MUST retake. I had a 167/3.9 (admittedly with pretty good softs) and had gotten D/M/V/Gtown -- after a retake I ended up at Y/S. A retake from your exact position (more or less) literally changed my life.
Schools DO NOT care about multiple LSAT scores. Anyone who tells you otherwise is wrong. Good luck OP! Study hard.
pittsburghpirates wrote:The way this was phrased made me laugh, but this is TCR OP. Don't waste an awesome GPA on a 167, especially if you left points on the table.Mack.Hambleton wrote:To lsac.org to schedule a retake
You're still likely going to work the same shitty job. Yale gives you a better shot at landing biglaw/clerkships, but firm jobs are still generally shitty. And what do clerks do after clerkships? Generally firms. So you're just going to a school that gives you a higher chance of ending up in a shitty job? Makes sense to me...ndirish2010 wrote:Graduating with 6 figure debt from Y vs. 6 figure debt from MIchigan or Cornell definitely qualifies as "changed my life" material.krads153 wrote:I agree that retaking is the best idea here, but I can't help but laugh at this comment. If you're graduating with six figure debt from Y/S (and I don't know - maybe you're not), you're still just as screwed as the next person. Going to law school is not some 'life changing" experience at all - it's not like winning the lottery/getting rich.Plainsman11011 wrote:Retake.
The classic TLS refrain. It used to annoy me so much pre-law school to see that inevitably posted in response to a 0L. But OP, you MUST retake. I had a 167/3.9 (admittedly with pretty good softs) and had gotten D/M/V/Gtown -- after a retake I ended up at Y/S. A retake from your exact position (more or less) literally changed my life.
Schools DO NOT care about multiple LSAT scores. Anyone who tells you otherwise is wrong. Good luck OP! Study hard.
Maybe, but you'd still have to live like a pauper for whatever number of years. And there are plenty of jobs straight out of college that pay more than 55k a year (at least in what I studied).ndirish2010 wrote:I am doing public interest (although a far different path than most on TLS would associate with PI). The opportunities for such jobs at HYS are so great and plus the LRAP. I have no debt from ND due to scholarship and a bit of parent help, but it's kind of crazy to think that my job actually wouldn't qualify for our LRAP at all (I make 55k). Pretty sure that would be 100% repayment from H.
Definitely not wealthy parents here, just have enough money to help keep me out of debt with substantial scholarship. Also, I really like my 55k job, so I'm happy with my decision. But I can imagine it would be very difficult for someone with 6 figure debt and no LRAP. To me, that points in favor of going to a top school with a good loan repayment program.krads153 wrote:Maybe, but you'd still have to live like a pauper for whatever number of years. And there are plenty of jobs straight out of college that pay more than 55k a year (at least in what I studied).ndirish2010 wrote:I am doing public interest (although a far different path than most on TLS would associate with PI). The opportunities for such jobs at HYS are so great and plus the LRAP. I have no debt from ND due to scholarship and a bit of parent help, but it's kind of crazy to think that my job actually wouldn't qualify for our LRAP at all (I make 55k). Pretty sure that would be 100% repayment from H.
Most kids I know who are doing PI (at least from my alma mater) come from rich families (parents funding all tuition and fees, giving them COL when they are working for rent, buying them 2-3 million dollar apartments, etc.). This obviously makes things a lot easier - they aren't working for the money. I'm just saying most 0Ls don't know what they're getting into, and if they don't have rich parents (unlike in my experience, most people who do PI), then it will be very difficult for them to survive financially if they take out six figure debt.