Page 1 of 1
Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:46 pm
by fishbulb
.
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:52 pm
by Hikikomorist
Was UCLA's offer an anomaly, or did you outperform your numbers across the board?
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:59 pm
by fishbulb
.
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:06 am
by PoopNpants
I think thats a great outcome with your numbers and considering your goals I'd take it. congrats
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:51 am
by Mack.Hambleton
How is your debt that low? 25k plus COL should be like 130k+ at repayment
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 10:22 am
by fishbulb
.
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 10:28 am
by Hikikomorist
Mack.Hambleton wrote:How is your debt that low? 25k plus COL should be like 130k+ at repayment
You know that was the total tuition for all three years, right?
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:37 am
by BasilHallward
Is there any reason for us to think that you won't 'lazily prep' for you third attempt?? If you want to take the LSAT seriously, then yes, retake. If not, then 166 is fine.
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:43 am
by chuckbass
Definitely not a bad option, but I would retake for the better shot at biglaw personally since you don't sound like you'd actually be happy doing PI.
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:18 pm
by A. Nony Mouse
BasilHallward wrote:fishbulb wrote:Don't quote please.
Is there any reason for us to think that you won't 'lazily prep' for you third attempt?? If you want to take the LSAT seriously, then yes, retake. If not, then 166 is fine.
The OP did ask you not to quote...
Re: Retake/reapply or nah?
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:03 pm
by Mack.Hambleton
Hikkomorist wrote:Mack.Hambleton wrote:How is your debt that low? 25k plus COL should be like 130k+ at repayment
You know that was the total tuition for all three years, right?
Oh ok