This is the absolute worst kind of preconcieved notion that perpetuates these fora.FirmBiz wrote: Wouldn't he be "ahead of the curve" by going to UH because he got into a T20 school and would be going up against T60 students at UH, so shouldn't it be more likely for him to have success at UH than other UH students, because he's essentially going to be going up against "weaker" competition?
Houston (near full ride) vs. Texas (close to sticker) Forum
-
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: Houston (near full ride) vs. Texas (close to sticker)
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Houston (near full ride) vs. Texas (close to sticker)
Yea my bad, I figured that a student that gets into a school with higher criteria would have an advantage over students at a school with lower criteria.sandwhich wrote:This is the absolute worst kind of preconcieved notion that perpetuates these fora.FirmBiz wrote: Wouldn't he be "ahead of the curve" by going to UH because he got into a T20 school and would be going up against T60 students at UH, so shouldn't it be more likely for him to have success at UH than other UH students, because he's essentially going to be going up against "weaker" competition?
-
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: Houston (near full ride) vs. Texas (close to sticker)
Yes, it surprises many how little logic has to do with predicting law school performance.FirmBiz wrote:Yea my bad, I figured that a student that gets into a school with higher criteria would have an advantage over students at a school with lower criteria.sandwhich wrote:This is the absolute worst kind of preconcieved notion that perpetuates these fora.FirmBiz wrote: Wouldn't he be "ahead of the curve" by going to UH because he got into a T20 school and would be going up against T60 students at UH, so shouldn't it be more likely for him to have success at UH than other UH students, because he's essentially going to be going up against "weaker" competition?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:12 am
Re: Houston (near full ride) vs. Texas (close to sticker)
For funsies: I came into UH at exactly median #'s (and no $) and finished top 5% so LSAT predictive value for the individual is not great. That being said I also studied all day every day during the school year, not so much for the LSAT.
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:33 pm
Re: Houston (near full ride) vs. Texas (close to sticker)
That's great, you can tell it to my near-genius level engineering pal who nevertheless got schooled on exams. There are so many factors beyond "brainpower" that it's incredibly facile to assume that higher LSAT ---> higher grades. Yes, there probably will be some correlation between the two. You can't rely on that! Plenty of smart people do poorly in law school.Ken Kesey wrote:Just so everyone knows, here's some actual data. I think it should be more convincing than personal attacks.scottidsntknow wrote:You're a complete idiot
http://www.lsac.org/docs/default-source ... -13-03.pdf
The p. value on the predictability of LSAT scores is <.0001, which is amazing.
Edit: link messed up. so you'll have to manually copy and paste.
Who's the idiot now?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 1:42 am
Re: Houston (near full ride) vs. Texas (close to sticker)
If big law isn't your goal then Houston.