Thomas Jefferson VS Faulkner
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:33 am
Thomas Jefferson School of Law vs Faulkner University School of Law?
Which of one would be a good choice? Any thoughts?
Which of one would be a good choice? Any thoughts?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=247498
transferror wrote:Second, "In order to receive the best feedback in this forum, please provide as much of the following information in your original post as possible:
-The schools you are considering
-The total Cost of Attendance (COA) of each. COA = cost of tuition + fees + books + cost of living (COL) + accumulated interest - scholarships. Here is a helpful calculator.
-How you will be financing your COA, i.e. loans, family, or savings
-Where you are from and where you want to work, and other places where you have significant ties (if any)
-Your general career goals
-Your LSAT/GPA numbers
-How many times you have taken the LSAT"
edited for word choice/clarity/blah
I choose to follow this interpretation and the answer is obviously Faulkner.BigZuck wrote:I thought this was a thread pitting one great American thinker vs another.
These are law schools?
Jefferson led a pretty incredible life. Faulkner's writing is more enjoyable to read. Tough call! I'm going to lean Jefferson on this one, but I think either choice is defensible.RancidSumo wrote:I choose to follow this interpretation and the answer is obviously Faulkner.BigZuck wrote:I thought this was a thread pitting one great American thinker vs another.
These are law schools?
So you fall more into the "the rural south is a grotesque cesspool" camp than the "the rural south is the heart of America" camp?RancidSumo wrote:I choose to follow this interpretation and the answer is obviously Faulkner.
The cost of coffee you'd incur reading Absalom makes it indefensible imoDavidConeSplitter wrote:Honestly the Sound and the Fury is the only Faulkner novel worth paying sticker for.
Absalom Absalom! and down I'd need at least a half discount
DavidConeSplitter wrote:Honestly the Sound and the Fury is the only Faulkner novel worth paying sticker for.
Absalom Absalom! and down I'd need at least a half discount

Jesus = the Cooley of alumni bases.KMart wrote:I'd take Jesus over Buddha. You get more of an alumni base to network with.
I'm hesitant to respond because I don't want to get reportedTraynor Brah wrote:Jesus = the Cooley of alumni bases.KMart wrote:I'd take Jesus over Buddha. You get more of an alumni base to network with.
IDK, with 5 1/2 of the Supreme Court justices, it's clear that for BIGSCOTUS your only options are Moses or Jesus.Traynor Brah wrote:Jesus = the Cooley of alumni bases.KMart wrote:I'd take Jesus over Buddha. You get more of an alumni base to network with.
Cooley, too, has a few notable people in its alumni base. For example: that one NHL coach.nothingtosee wrote:IDK, with 5 1/2 of the Supreme Court justices, it's clear that for BIGSCOTUS your only options are Moses or Jesus.Traynor Brah wrote:Jesus = the Cooley of alumni bases.KMart wrote:I'd take Jesus over Buddha. You get more of an alumni base to network with.
We are discussing the literary merit of historical figures since nobody could figure out how this applied to law school. Unfortunately, several plebs have chimed in with their incorrect opinions. Out of the four, Faulkner is the only one to turn out any real literature. Everything he wrote is a masterpiece. Jesus gets partial credit for his contributions to the King James Bible. Thomas Jefferson and Buddha have no discernible talent between them. I can't think of a single thing either one wrote that anyone cares to read.ilikebaseball wrote:what is happening itt
RancidSumo wrote:We are discussing the literary merit of historical figures since nobody could figure out how this applied to law school. Unfortunately, several plebs have chimed in with their incorrect opinions. Out of the four, Faulkner is the only one to turn out any real literature. Everything he wrote is a masterpiece. Jesus gets partial credit for his contributions to the King James Bible. Thomas Jefferson and Buddha have no discernible talent between them. I can't think of a single thing either one wrote that anyone cares to read.ilikebaseball wrote:what is happening itt

it was rather obnoxious to post an image of this size.nothingtosee wrote:RancidSumo wrote:We are discussing the literary merit of historical figures since nobody could figure out how this applied to law school. Unfortunately, several plebs have chimed in with their incorrect opinions. Out of the four, Faulkner is the only one to turn out any real literature. Everything he wrote is a masterpiece. Jesus gets partial credit for his contributions to the King James Bible. Thomas Jefferson and Buddha have no discernible talent between them. I can't think of a single thing either one wrote that anyone cares to read.ilikebaseball wrote:what is happening itt
I don't read nonfiction.nothingtosee wrote:extralargepenmanshippractice.jpgRancidSumo wrote:We are discussing the literary merit of historical figures since nobody could figure out how this applied to law school. Unfortunately, several plebs have chimed in with their incorrect opinions. Out of the four, Faulkner is the only one to turn out any real literature. Everything he wrote is a masterpiece. Jesus gets partial credit for his contributions to the King James Bible. Thomas Jefferson and Buddha have no discernible talent between them. I can't think of a single thing either one wrote that anyone cares to read.ilikebaseball wrote:what is happening itt