Cornell v. USC halp!
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:53 pm
-The schools you are considering
The schools I'm considering are Cornell and USC. I also got into UCLA but their offer has been lower than either of Cornell's and USC's so presumably, they are off the table.
-The total Cost of Attendance (COA) of each. COA = cost of tuition + fees + books + cost of living (COL) + accumulated interest - scholarships. Here is a helpful calculator.
I arrived at the COA based off of the COA spreadsheet from ls22.
School:Scholarship Amount:COA
Cornell:90k:180k
USC:135k:100k
-How you will be financing your COA, i.e. loans, family, or savings
Have about 20k in savings. This amount was used to arrive ath the 180k and 100k amounts above. The balance will be financed via loans. Parents might be able to pitch in a little bit but I don't want to straddle them with my debt issues. We're poors, so like most people, money is an issue for us.
-Where you are from and where you want to work, and other places where you have significant ties (if any)
I am from NY. Not a fan.. Always saw myself moving out west, but it never really happened. Everything I've done was basically confined to NY/the North-East. It was the path of least resistance. I feel like if I go to Cornell, I'm really pidgeonholing myself into NY. I will admit, I am being starry eyed here, and have no clue what CA/CA biglaw is like. I understand biglaw is going to be brutal irrespective of the market but it seems like NY is the most intense (iirc, according to TLS, LA is like 200-300 less billables and requires less facetime?). CA seems to have better weather, better col (at least SoCal), nicer people, more interesting industries, not super fast paced, etc. - what's not to like? Feel free to let me know I'm being dense or whatever if this is way off base.
-Your general career goals
I have worked as a paralegal in NY for a large firm and so I am fairly well acquainted with the lifestyle. Obviously, it can suck horribly (hours, unpredictability, difficult people to work with, work can be dense, bureaucracy, constant second guessing, paranoia, etc.) but I actually didn't find the experience horrible and could see myself doing this as an attorney. I have fairly thick skin and I found that the work can be interesting. I think I would enjoy it more as I developed an expertise or w.e. Eventually, I guess I'd go in-house somewhere. In NY, it seems the only exit options are financial institutions though, and I don't really think that's where I would like to end up.
Ideally, I guess it would be CA biglaw> biglaw anywhere else including NY> midlaw, etc. I don't know what midlaw really is though. In these types of threads, people always seem to say if you are okay working in CA even in mid/small law, go to the regional school (UCLA/USC). Otherwise, take the t14. Are these "midlaw/small law" positions "bad" outcomes? I guess I'd take biglaw in any market over anything midlaw/small law. Obviously Cornell has the better safety net in this regard, but it seems I would be confined to NY, as I have no ties elsewhere.
-Your LSAT/GPA numbers
169/3.7
-How many times you have taken the LSAT
The LSAT defeated me. I took the exam 3x and scored the best on my initial attempt... I don't even know what happened. I studied during all the time I had outside of work, and even quit work to study for a final retake. Was PTing around 171-180 for my final attempt. Left the exam super confident only to find out I bombed.
-Misc info/recap
Ivy undergrad. Not a fan of NY, despite it being my hometown. Got waitlisted throughout the t14.. Attended both schools' ASDs. Really liked USC. Cornell was okay. Seemed a bit stuffy. Weather also sucks for half the year amirite?
Bottom line is, would it be crazy for me to take USC and their 37.5% employment rate over Cornell's 70% for SoCal without ties? If I went to USC, I would target LA and mass mail NY and other markets. If I went to Cornell, I would target NY and mass mail CA and other markets.
Thanks in advance!
The schools I'm considering are Cornell and USC. I also got into UCLA but their offer has been lower than either of Cornell's and USC's so presumably, they are off the table.
-The total Cost of Attendance (COA) of each. COA = cost of tuition + fees + books + cost of living (COL) + accumulated interest - scholarships. Here is a helpful calculator.
I arrived at the COA based off of the COA spreadsheet from ls22.
School:Scholarship Amount:COA
Cornell:90k:180k
USC:135k:100k
-How you will be financing your COA, i.e. loans, family, or savings
Have about 20k in savings. This amount was used to arrive ath the 180k and 100k amounts above. The balance will be financed via loans. Parents might be able to pitch in a little bit but I don't want to straddle them with my debt issues. We're poors, so like most people, money is an issue for us.
-Where you are from and where you want to work, and other places where you have significant ties (if any)
I am from NY. Not a fan.. Always saw myself moving out west, but it never really happened. Everything I've done was basically confined to NY/the North-East. It was the path of least resistance. I feel like if I go to Cornell, I'm really pidgeonholing myself into NY. I will admit, I am being starry eyed here, and have no clue what CA/CA biglaw is like. I understand biglaw is going to be brutal irrespective of the market but it seems like NY is the most intense (iirc, according to TLS, LA is like 200-300 less billables and requires less facetime?). CA seems to have better weather, better col (at least SoCal), nicer people, more interesting industries, not super fast paced, etc. - what's not to like? Feel free to let me know I'm being dense or whatever if this is way off base.
-Your general career goals
I have worked as a paralegal in NY for a large firm and so I am fairly well acquainted with the lifestyle. Obviously, it can suck horribly (hours, unpredictability, difficult people to work with, work can be dense, bureaucracy, constant second guessing, paranoia, etc.) but I actually didn't find the experience horrible and could see myself doing this as an attorney. I have fairly thick skin and I found that the work can be interesting. I think I would enjoy it more as I developed an expertise or w.e. Eventually, I guess I'd go in-house somewhere. In NY, it seems the only exit options are financial institutions though, and I don't really think that's where I would like to end up.
Ideally, I guess it would be CA biglaw> biglaw anywhere else including NY> midlaw, etc. I don't know what midlaw really is though. In these types of threads, people always seem to say if you are okay working in CA even in mid/small law, go to the regional school (UCLA/USC). Otherwise, take the t14. Are these "midlaw/small law" positions "bad" outcomes? I guess I'd take biglaw in any market over anything midlaw/small law. Obviously Cornell has the better safety net in this regard, but it seems I would be confined to NY, as I have no ties elsewhere.
-Your LSAT/GPA numbers
169/3.7
-How many times you have taken the LSAT
The LSAT defeated me. I took the exam 3x and scored the best on my initial attempt... I don't even know what happened. I studied during all the time I had outside of work, and even quit work to study for a final retake. Was PTing around 171-180 for my final attempt. Left the exam super confident only to find out I bombed.
-Misc info/recap
Ivy undergrad. Not a fan of NY, despite it being my hometown. Got waitlisted throughout the t14.. Attended both schools' ASDs. Really liked USC. Cornell was okay. Seemed a bit stuffy. Weather also sucks for half the year amirite?
Bottom line is, would it be crazy for me to take USC and their 37.5% employment rate over Cornell's 70% for SoCal without ties? If I went to USC, I would target LA and mass mail NY and other markets. If I went to Cornell, I would target NY and mass mail CA and other markets.
Thanks in advance!