Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L? Forum
- radio1nowhere
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:01 pm
Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
Thanks for the input all!
Last edited by radio1nowhere on Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
The chances of landing one of these positions from any school is so vanishingly small (and depends on so many factors completely separate from what school you attend) that this aspiration almost certainly shouldn't factor in your decision.
- zombie mcavoy
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:11 pm
- KMart
- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
H/S are going to give you the best people to become friends with for your future position.
I don't think it's something to base a school decision off of, as the thread title suggests, though.
I don't think it's something to base a school decision off of, as the thread title suggests, though.
- KMart
- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
I hope it turns into a Brainiac-type thread .zombie mcavoy wrote:tag
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
Emma. wrote:The chances of landing one of these positions from any school is so vanishingly small (and depends on so many factors completely separate from what school you attend) that this aspiration almost certainly shouldn't factor in your decision.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
^This.rpupkin wrote:Emma. wrote:The chances of landing one of these positions from any school is so vanishingly small (and depends on so many factors completely separate from what school you attend) that this aspiration almost certainly shouldn't factor in your decision.
I'm also not sure wanting to be an AIII judge for better work-life balance makes a lot of sense, honestly.
- starry eyed
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:26 am
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
tag, this one has potential
- UnicornHunter
- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
This. The Federal Judges I've encountered are incredibly busy. Seems like professor is a much better and slightly less impossible work/life balanced path. And it pays better (source: COA Judge who also teaches).A. Nony Mouse wrote:^This.rpupkin wrote:Emma. wrote:The chances of landing one of these positions from any school is so vanishingly small (and depends on so many factors completely separate from what school you attend) that this aspiration almost certainly shouldn't factor in your decision.
I'm also not sure wanting to be an AIII judge for better work-life balance makes a lot of sense, honestly.
e. also, it's not happening. Sorry.
- MarkfromWI
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 4:54 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
There are only 9 federal justices. Five of them graduated from Harvard, three from Yale, and the Notorious RBG went to Harvard before transferring to Columbia.radio1nowhere wrote: I haven't been able to find any aggregate data on which schools federal justices attended
For federal judges, I doubt there is any sort of aggregate data. But food for thought, just last week I applied to a federal judge who went to Tulane, and I've got my eye on another who went to Nova Southeastern. Just saying...
- radio1nowhere
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:01 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
fixed.MarkfromWI wrote:There are only 9 federal justices.
- radio1nowhere
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:01 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
Well, that was easily answered! So forgetting about judgeship crap, do you guys have any suggestions about which school to attend for clerkship --> BigLaw? I still need help with the choice. The clerkship numbers at all those schools are pretty similar, with the exception of SLS's insane 30%.
- MarkfromWI
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 4:54 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
How debt averse are you? 200k is a ton of debt, and only you can decide if $3k-$3.5k in payments EVERY MONTH for the next ten years is worth it.
If I were you, I'd take the Cornell offer. Solid biglaw placement, with a pipeline into NYC, plus its clerkship rate is higher than both Duke and NYU (though admittedly not by a large margin).
If I were you, I'd take the Cornell offer. Solid biglaw placement, with a pipeline into NYC, plus its clerkship rate is higher than both Duke and NYU (though admittedly not by a large margin).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- starry eyed
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:26 am
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
OP basically its a gamble. On one hand you take the almost guaranteed big law job out of cornell and don't pay 3k a month for 10 years but you might wonder what would have happened had you gone to Harvard. The other is you go to Harvard, more than likely not end up with a federal clerkship, regret not going to Cornell, and get reminded every month of your bad decision when you write that student loan check
Last edited by starry eyed on Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BVest
- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
Judicial Yellow Book has an index by law school, I think. That would be at least informative.MarkfromWI wrote:For federal judges, I doubt there is any sort of aggregate data.
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Judgeships too unicorn to even think about as a 0L?
Harvard and Yale are dominant overall. After that, it takes on a heavily regional character.
In the northeast (1-3 Cir, SDNY, EDNY, EDPA, DNJ, DConn, DNH, ect), a lot of judges went to Columbia or NYU. In the midwest (7th and 8th Cir, N.D. Illinois, ect) a lot of judges went to Northwestern or UChicago or Michigan. In California (9th, CDCA, NDCA) Stanford and Berkeley are best represented. In the South (4-6, 11 Cir and districts within), a lot of judges went to Duke and Virginia.
There's absolutely no point in attending law school based on where federal judges went to law school 30-50 years ago.
In the northeast (1-3 Cir, SDNY, EDNY, EDPA, DNJ, DConn, DNH, ect), a lot of judges went to Columbia or NYU. In the midwest (7th and 8th Cir, N.D. Illinois, ect) a lot of judges went to Northwestern or UChicago or Michigan. In California (9th, CDCA, NDCA) Stanford and Berkeley are best represented. In the South (4-6, 11 Cir and districts within), a lot of judges went to Duke and Virginia.
There's absolutely no point in attending law school based on where federal judges went to law school 30-50 years ago.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login