Columbia $$ Vs. Cornell and Michigan ($$$) Forum
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Columbia $$ Vs. Cornell and Michigan ($$$)
I already posted this before but I am changing the OP to reflect new offers.
Columbia-COA ~175
Cornell and Michigan-COA ~104
Goals: Biglaw first. Since I believe in having goals, I'm going to gun for entertainment. I have ties to the Chicago area but I know that the entertainment industry really only exists in LA and NYC if that even becomes an option. City rank goes LA>Chi>NYC but this could change.
Is Columbia's higher level of prestige and portability worth the extra 70K?
Thanks!
Columbia-COA ~175
Cornell and Michigan-COA ~104
Goals: Biglaw first. Since I believe in having goals, I'm going to gun for entertainment. I have ties to the Chicago area but I know that the entertainment industry really only exists in LA and NYC if that even becomes an option. City rank goes LA>Chi>NYC but this could change.
Is Columbia's higher level of prestige and portability worth the extra 70K?
Thanks!
Last edited by 90convoy on Tue Apr 14, 2015 2:45 pm, edited 4 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
Hey 90, congrats on all your acceptances...anything from NU?
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
Hey thanks! You too. Like really.
I messed up and missed the scholarship deadline. I'm not too happy about that but oh well.
On phone sorry for typos
I messed up and missed the scholarship deadline. I'm not too happy about that but oh well.
On phone sorry for typos
Last edited by 90convoy on Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
What school wouldn't you have to be very ok with NYC big law?
I think that's a T14 thing, not something limited to just Cornell. I'd probably consider dropping the unicorn and making peace with the NYC big law drone thing because that'll be your best bet for big law.
NU might be a good option for Chicago. Chicago is probably your best option for Chicago, but it's not worth it at what I think you're saying the cost of attendance would be.
LA without ties might be a toughie. Maybe go to Berkeley if CA is the goal.
I think that's a T14 thing, not something limited to just Cornell. I'd probably consider dropping the unicorn and making peace with the NYC big law drone thing because that'll be your best bet for big law.
NU might be a good option for Chicago. Chicago is probably your best option for Chicago, but it's not worth it at what I think you're saying the cost of attendance would be.
LA without ties might be a toughie. Maybe go to Berkeley if CA is the goal.
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
I was under the impression that the t-14 has for the most part an absence of being regionally restricted?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
If you're from the midwest and go to school on the east coast, I'm doubting a CA firm is going to be particularly interested in hiring you. Unless you have something they really covet (amazing grades, maybe a diversity factor they want) you're going to be just one dime in many many dozens. Tons of CA kids go to T14 schools and they can (and probably will) pick them over you if you're an otherwise ordinary candidate (which you likely will be). And even if you're not they might still pass over you for the local kid.90convoy wrote:I was under the impression that the t-14 has for the most part an absence of being regionally restricted?
It's not an absolute, set in stone thing. But I wouldn't expect much of anything in CA to happen for you. NYC is the fallback, I'd focus on that and where you have ties (which is a decent legal market, so that's a good thing for you)
Anyway, my main point is that if you go to Duke, Columbia, etc. you're going to have to be just as open to NYC as if you went to Cornell.
- bruinfan10
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
While this is generally true, it's much more true of SF than LA. LA is far more dgaf about ties.BigZuck wrote:If you're from the midwest and go to school on the east coast, I'm doubting a CA firm is going to be particularly interested in hiring you. Unless you have something they really covet (amazing grades, maybe a diversity factor they want) you're going to be just one dime in many many dozens. Tons of CA kids go to T14 schools and they can (and probably will) pick them over you if you're an otherwise ordinary candidate (which you likely will be). And even if you're not they might still pass over you for the local kid.90convoy wrote:I was under the impression that the t-14 has for the most part an absence of being regionally restricted?
It's not an absolute, set in stone thing. But I wouldn't expect much of anything in CA to happen for you. NYC is the fallback, I'd focus on that and where you have ties (which is a decent legal market, so that's a good thing for you)
Anyway, my main point is that if you go to Duke, Columbia, etc. you're going to have to be just as open to NYC as if you went to Cornell.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
For surebruinfan10 wrote:While this is generally true, it's much more true of SF than LA. LA is far more dgaf about ties.BigZuck wrote:If you're from the midwest and go to school on the east coast, I'm doubting a CA firm is going to be particularly interested in hiring you. Unless you have something they really covet (amazing grades, maybe a diversity factor they want) you're going to be just one dime in many many dozens. Tons of CA kids go to T14 schools and they can (and probably will) pick them over you if you're an otherwise ordinary candidate (which you likely will be). And even if you're not they might still pass over you for the local kid.90convoy wrote:I was under the impression that the t-14 has for the most part an absence of being regionally restricted?
It's not an absolute, set in stone thing. But I wouldn't expect much of anything in CA to happen for you. NYC is the fallback, I'd focus on that and where you have ties (which is a decent legal market, so that's a good thing for you)
Anyway, my main point is that if you go to Duke, Columbia, etc. you're going to have to be just as open to NYC as if you went to Cornell.
My original point though was less about ties and more about my thoughts on "Cornell=NYC big law, everything else= MAXIMUM PORTABILITY." I can dig that there's probably more geographically dispersed Michigan/Duke alums and that might be helpful on some level but NYC is still very much the fallback IMO
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
Cornell is your best option. Forget about CCN
if you're KJD or have no reason to run off to law school Id suggest reapplying and EDing NU if you really want chicago. if not just go to Cornell
if you're KJD or have no reason to run off to law school Id suggest reapplying and EDing NU if you really want chicago. if not just go to Cornell
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
hmmm. okay thanks. Do you (or anyone) think there is really much of a difference between 90K of debt and 160K with regard to quality of life? I just dont feel like 70K is much over the course of a lifetime....especially when considering the better opportunities that may arise from going to a higher ranked schoolMack.Hambleton wrote:Cornell is your best option. Forget about CCN
if you're KJD or have no reason to run off to law school Id suggest reapplying and EDing NU if you really want chicago. if not just go to Cornell
-
- Posts: 11413
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
Duke seems to be your best option since you don't want NYC.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
What is Duke buying for the OP that Cornell isn't?CanadianWolf wrote:Duke seems to be your best option since you don't want NYC.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
The increased interest payments can easily be the difference between a nice apartment/house and a shitty apartment/house during some of the best years of your life.90convoy wrote:Do you (or anyone) think there is really much of a difference between 90K of debt and 160K with regard to quality of life? I just dont feel like 70K is much over the course of a lifetime....especially when considering the better opportunities that may arise from going to a higher ranked school
And, in your case, the "higher ranked schools" aren't likely to lead to better opportunities.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- middlebear
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 4:48 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
If I were you I'd make sure to hold up Cornell and Duke's Chicago placement numbers side by side, but yeah, I'd be tempted to go Duke if I were you.CanadianWolf wrote:Duke seems to be your best option since you don't want NYC.
And to echo the poster above, I think that 70k does make a difference when you're going the BigLaw route.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
what are the two options?90convoy wrote:hmmm. okay thanks. Do you (or anyone) think there is really much of a difference between 90K of debt and 160K with regard to quality of life? I just dont feel like 70K is much over the course of a lifetime....especially when considering the better opportunities that may arise from going to a higher ranked schoolMack.Hambleton wrote:Cornell is your best option. Forget about CCN
if you're KJD or have no reason to run off to law school Id suggest reapplying and EDing NU if you really want chicago. if not just go to Cornell
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
I'm talking about comparing Duke/Cornell to Chicago...the difference may be more like 85K but stillMack.Hambleton wrote:what are the two options?90convoy wrote:hmmm. okay thanks. Do you (or anyone) think there is really much of a difference between 90K of debt and 160K with regard to quality of life? I just dont feel like 70K is much over the course of a lifetime....especially when considering the better opportunities that may arise from going to a higher ranked schoolMack.Hambleton wrote:Cornell is your best option. Forget about CCN
if you're KJD or have no reason to run off to law school Id suggest reapplying and EDing NU if you really want chicago. if not just go to Cornell
- Other25BeforeYou
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:19 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
That's a lot of money (and when you consider interest over 10 years I think it actually pans about to about a 100k difference, over 25 years it's more than $150k difference), particularly since you have no idea of whether you'll enjoy being a lawyer or not. Some kinds of debt are easier to handle because you can dispose of them relatively easy. If you have a mortgage you can usually (though not always) sell your house and get enough to pay it off. If you finish law and start practicing and realize a year in that what you really desperately want to do with your life is be a pastry chef, you can't sell your law degree since you don't want to use it anymore. You just get to hang on to that debt for the next 20 years. It can be pretty rough.90convoy wrote:I'm talking about comparing Duke/Cornell to Chicago...the difference may be more like 85K but stillMack.Hambleton wrote:what are the two options?90convoy wrote:hmmm. okay thanks. Do you (or anyone) think there is really much of a difference between 90K of debt and 160K with regard to quality of life? I just dont feel like 70K is much over the course of a lifetime....especially when considering the better opportunities that may arise from going to a higher ranked schoolMack.Hambleton wrote:Cornell is your best option. Forget about CCN
if you're KJD or have no reason to run off to law school Id suggest reapplying and EDing NU if you really want chicago. if not just go to Cornell
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
Duke if they hold the lead
Head west if Madison ties it up
ETA: duke it is
Head west if Madison ties it up
ETA: duke it is
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
Thanks everybody. I appreciate the inputs, they will def figure in. I'll probably wait on what Columbia offers and then make the decision. It would just be nice to experience somethin new (not Midwest) for a while. Being 21 and single I feel like I can afford to take risks ya know
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Columbia(?) vs. Cornell$$$ vs. Chicago$ vs. Duke$$
UPDATE: M gave me a great offer. It would involve me leaving with less debt than Cornell. Any more tips? Thanks
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
Re: Cornell vs. Chicago vs. Duke UPDATE!
Take your Michigan offer to Duke.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Cornell vs. Chicago vs. Duke UPDATE!
WeeBey wrote:Take your Michigan offer to Duke.
alright!
Also, bump. I changed the OP and would be grateful if anyone could give me any help with this
- bruinfan10
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am
Re: Cornell vs. Chicago vs. Duke UPDATE!
I wouldn't pay 70k more for CLS. You have to screw up pretty badly at Michigan to strike out on NYC biglaw, and Michigan places a little better in LA than Cornell to the extent you want to keep that door open.90convoy wrote:WeeBey wrote:Take your Michigan offer to Duke.
alright!
Also, bump. I changed the OP and would be grateful if anyone could give me any help with this
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Columbia $$ Vs. Cornell and Michigan ($$$)
$70k difference is a lot of money. That's probably closer to $100k after loan payments. But I went to Michigan so I'm biased.
I've said this a lot on here, but ties to an area can be developed over your 1L summer. I'm from the east coast and got an SA and then a clerkship in Texas. I worked at one of the Texas cities for my 1L summers, met with some attorneys while I was there, and was able to tell a convincing story about why I wanted to be in Texas. I don't think CA will be tougher to sell.
Firms will ask you (at least on callbacks) why you went to the school you did, and just tell them your reasons. I had a scholly at Michigan and liked the vibe. No one questioned that. No one is going to question Columbia or Cornell with a scholarship either.
I've said this a lot on here, but ties to an area can be developed over your 1L summer. I'm from the east coast and got an SA and then a clerkship in Texas. I worked at one of the Texas cities for my 1L summers, met with some attorneys while I was there, and was able to tell a convincing story about why I wanted to be in Texas. I don't think CA will be tougher to sell.
Firms will ask you (at least on callbacks) why you went to the school you did, and just tell them your reasons. I had a scholly at Michigan and liked the vibe. No one questioned that. No one is going to question Columbia or Cornell with a scholarship either.
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
Re: Cornell vs. Chicago vs. Duke UPDATE!
With 54% in BL + FC, I'm a little skeptical of that statement. Even GULC is at 48% and I think they have a greater self-selection bias.bruinfan10 wrote:I wouldn't pay 70k more for CLS. You have to screw up pretty badly at Michigan to strike out on NYC biglaw, and Michigan places a little better in LA than Cornell to the extent you want to keep that door open.90convoy wrote:WeeBey wrote:Take your Michigan offer to Duke.
alright!
Also, bump. I changed the OP and would be grateful if anyone could give me any help with this
Cornell placed 74% BL + FC, that means well below median folks are getting biglaw. Sure, it is probably all NYC Biglaw, however, if you get biglaw from either school, it most likely will be NYC, but Cornell will place better into NYC. And you can always lateral to CA after a few years in NYC.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login