Emory Law ($$$) or GULC ($$)
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:54 am
...
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=245806
Slightly - I'm sure he'll help out with groceries and general COL stuff, but nothing significant.Dipper wrote:Is SO helping with living expenses if you stay in DC?
Sorry to hack up your OP, but these are the things that should probably factor into your decision the most (outside of total costs). There's really very little reason to go to Emory if you have no ties to Atlanta/want to be in biglaw. As a stand-alone option, 130k for GULC is pretty decent. That said, what kind of undergrad debt are you looking at? If you have 70k+ in undergrad debt, it might (disturbingly enough) make more sense to take out sticker debt at a higher-ranked school because the difference between 200k+ and 400k+ is pretty negligible once you're in the "definitely doing IBR" category. Whereas at which point, you probably maximize your chances of biglaw.Jessicakes90 wrote:Bankruptcy in BigLaw [...] Significant other lives in DC [...] I'd like to be in DC [...] No ties to ATL. [...] I still have a decent amount of undergrad loans I'm paying off.
Definitely comfortable re-taking (I only took it once) for potentially scholarship increases, but re-applying in a new cycle isn't an option. Would you recommend re-taking just for potential scholarship bumps?Winston1984 wrote: Could you sign up for the June test? Maybe see how you do then?
In terms of undergrad loans, I'm looking at about 40K. So, ideally, keeping my total debt under 200K is the goal.twenty wrote:That said, what kind of undergrad debt are you looking at? If you have 70k+ in undergrad debt, it might (disturbingly enough) make more sense to take out sticker debt at a higher-ranked school because the difference between 200k+ and 400k+ is pretty negligible once you're in the "definitely doing IBR" category. Whereas at which point, you probably maximize your chances of biglaw.
Alternatively, if non-biglaw is an option for you,I would run to Cardozo.
edit> actually, I would spend the extra 10k and go to Howard.
edit2> But if Howard's scholarship stipulations are brutal, then go back to Cardozo.
Yes, take for a scholarship bump. But if you hit 170+ it might be worth it to sit out. I honestly don't know much better your offers could get with your gpa though. I would go over to the URM form and ask those guys and do some looking around on LSN.Jessicakes90 wrote:Definitely comfortable re-taking (I only took it once) for potentially scholarship increases, but re-applying in a new cycle isn't an option. Would you recommend re-taking just for potential scholarship bumps?Winston1984 wrote: Could you sign up for the June test? Maybe see how you do then?
Yeah, I've done some perusing but not to much avail, unfortunately. I'll try starting a thread over there, thanks for the suggestion! I don't imagine much will change because GPA is just so low - for the record, I was supporting my family financially through undergrad, which I wrote about in addendums. Not sure it matters much though.Winston1984 wrote:Yes, take for a scholarship bump. But if you hit 170+ it might be worth it to sit out. I honestly don't know much better your offers could get with your gpa though. I would go over to the URM form and ask those guys and do some looking around on LSN.
So comforting to hear, gratsi.lawdoggy wrote: Yes. Every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
I mean, that's a tough question to answer. I think really anywhere is a gamble with BigLaw except for the T6 schools so I'm definitely going in eyes wide open. I'm just curious as to whether the cost-benefit analysis shows GULC being a better choice than Emory, all factors considered. I think, arguably, I'd be equally upset at being 80K in debt as 130K if it means being in a position where I can't afford to pay off my loans. In my ideal situation, I'm taking on 80K of debt with a good BigLaw job, but it sounds like the likelihood of Emory producing a strong Biglaw job isn't that high....Nomo wrote:Depends. How upset will you be if you borrow all that money for Georgetown and don't get biglaw? Your chance at biglaw is only a little better than a coin flip.
Good suggestion. Apparently, Emory does decently with NY biglaw (Emory in NY program). Not too sure about Delaware bankruptcy though. I'll look into it!BmoreOrLess wrote:The big Delaware bankruptcy shops were recruiting 1L's at GULC this year. Might want to check if they even go to Emory.
Oh I did. Haven't heard back from CLS, NYU, Northwestern, UPenn and Duke yet. I didn't even bother with HYS because *LOL* not with my GPA. CLS/NYU/UPenn were the result of pressure from fam to "just apply and see what happens!" Cornell is the only school I wish I applied to that I didn't.WeeBey wrote:You didnt apply to other T14s?
Idk if you would get more $$$, but you'd get better offers at probably the same amount of $$$. Not to mention The rest of the T14 place 60% in biglaw/fedclerkships (except mich and berk - high 50s) whereas GULC only did 46% last year.
Absent other T14 w/money, GULC is a no-brainer here.Sorry to hack up your OP, but these are the things that should probably factor into your decision the most (outside of total costs). There's really very little reason to go to Emory
Primarily because Emory is significantly cheaper. I'm quite debt-averse and unsure if the difference in potential outcomes from both schools warrants the additional ~50K in debt I'd be taking on, situational factors aside. Based on ABA reports etc, there is obviously better job placements coming out of GULC... but it's not Yale, lol. But hearing everyone's perspective, it seems like it definitely is worth the additional debt for the security and job prospects of GULC over Emory.lawdoggy wrote:Seems like there are a lot of situational factors here that also make GULC a real no-brainer. I'm really not sure why Emory is in this conversation at all.