Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law? Forum
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:40 pm
Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Hey TLS,
I want to practice in Portland and I'm interested in environmental law. Which is the better option to achieve this:
Stanford with $$ (35k annually)
Lewis & Clark (no scholarship info yet) -- assuming full ride.
Thanks.
I want to practice in Portland and I'm interested in environmental law. Which is the better option to achieve this:
Stanford with $$ (35k annually)
Lewis & Clark (no scholarship info yet) -- assuming full ride.
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Stanford with no scholarship would still probably be the better option.
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Stanford, with the caveat that getting back to PDX is difficult even coming from top schools. The T3 prestige factor will certainly open up doors, but if you're not from the area, they will view you as an outsider. And if you are from the area, they will view you as a traitor for leaving, even for a top school.
But the Stanford name will help neutralize some of that suspicion, and will also give you the backup of being able to look for jobs in other markets.
I'm not trying to be too pessimistic. Stanford + decent grades + local PDX ties and you'd probably be just fine. Just don't underestimate the insularity and tiny size of the Portland legal market as a whole and the miniscule enviro law field specifically.
But the Stanford name will help neutralize some of that suspicion, and will also give you the backup of being able to look for jobs in other markets.
I'm not trying to be too pessimistic. Stanford + decent grades + local PDX ties and you'd probably be just fine. Just don't underestimate the insularity and tiny size of the Portland legal market as a whole and the miniscule enviro law field specifically.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Stanford by a country mile.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
The OP has a 3.1/167 and got into Stanford?
Also, they are an international student and their country is paying. And they care about saving a little more by going to Lewis and Clark?
Something doesn't add up here.
Also, they are an international student and their country is paying. And they care about saving a little more by going to Lewis and Clark?
Something doesn't add up here.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
maybe they meant Stamford
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Whatever it is I'm going to get to the bottom of it.fats provolone wrote:maybe they meant Stamford
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
maury is filmed there so that's a plus
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Stanford hands down.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Eh. The Portland market is extremely insular. But someone who grew up in Portland and then goes to law school at Stanford (or Harvard or Yale) is not generally viewed as "a traitor" for attending a top school. A Portland native who goes to SLS (and who consistently shows a strong interest in returning to the Portland market) is probably going to do fine.rinkrat19 wrote:Stanford, with the caveat that getting back to PDX is difficult even coming from top schools. The T3 prestige factor will certainly open up doors, but if you're not from the area, they will view you as an outsider. And if you are from the area, they will view you as a traitor for leaving, even for a top school.
- Clemenceau
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
What happened here
-
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Clemenceau wrote:What happened here
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Serious question: Where do you think the traitor line should be drawn? Are you only a traitor if you go to a school ranked 4 and below?rpupkin wrote:Eh. The Portland market is extremely insular. But someone who grew up in Portland and then goes to law school at Stanford (or Harvard or Yale) is not generally viewed as "a traitor" for attending a top school. A Portland native who goes to SLS (and who consistently shows a strong interest in returning to the Portland market) is probably going to do fine.rinkrat19 wrote:Stanford, with the caveat that getting back to PDX is difficult even coming from top schools. The T3 prestige factor will certainly open up doors, but if you're not from the area, they will view you as an outsider. And if you are from the area, they will view you as a traitor for leaving, even for a top school.
- UnderTheLaw
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:51 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
This is a great question that I hope we can discuss.BigZuck wrote:
Serious question: Where do you think the traitor line should be drawn? Are you only a traitor if you go to a school ranked 4 and below?
- ballcaps
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:20 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
i...don't...understand...
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
tyUnderTheLaw wrote:This is a great question that I hope we can discuss.BigZuck wrote:
Serious question: Where do you think the traitor line should be drawn? Are you only a traitor if you go to a school ranked 4 and below?
Still working on trying to figure out what the OP's deal is, I'll report back when I find something
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Duke. The traitor line should be drawn at Duke.BigZuck wrote:
Serious question: Where do you think the traitor line should be drawn? Are you only a traitor if you go to a school ranked 4 and below?
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
The traitor line is definitely drawn somewhere north of NU.rpupkin wrote:Duke. The traitor line should be drawn at Duke.BigZuck wrote:
Serious question: Where do you think the traitor line should be drawn? Are you only a traitor if you go to a school ranked 4 and below?
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
it's almost as if op was some kind of troll, making threads with ridiculous premises to get a rise out of tlsBigZuck wrote:The OP has a 3.1/167 and got into Stanford?
Also, they are an international student and their country is paying. And they care about saving a little more by going to Lewis and Clark?
Something doesn't add up here.
no, that couldn't happen. this is the internet
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
US news and world report specialty surveys are particularly instructive. very important for the field, practitioners drool over them. Lewis & Clark #1 beats Stanford at #3 in general ranking.
However, financial considerations loom large. That's a lot of money from Stanford and definitely worth weighing against the value of a laughably flawed commercial magazine survey, but overall, I'd say the gap in prestige and notoriety in environmental law, a burgeoning field, is wide enough that you should take the extra debt and follow your dreams at L&C.
However, financial considerations loom large. That's a lot of money from Stanford and definitely worth weighing against the value of a laughably flawed commercial magazine survey, but overall, I'd say the gap in prestige and notoriety in environmental law, a burgeoning field, is wide enough that you should take the extra debt and follow your dreams at L&C.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 4:42 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
You do realize that the Saudi Crown Prince chose lewis and clark over stanford right? TLS Bias
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:40 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
Thanks guys appreciate your input
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:40 pm
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
source?shay2171 wrote:You do realize that the Saudi Crown Prince chose lewis and clark over stanford right? TLS Bias
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:52 am
Re: Stanford $$ or Lewis & Clark for environmental law?
What happened to Cornell and GULC?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login