Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law Forum
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:41 am
Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship
They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)
Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking
My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration
Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out
Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship
They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)
Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking
My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration
Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out
Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
- Mullens
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Neither. You will ruin your life.
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
If you won't retake or truly, honestly feel that a 151 represents the height of your abilities, you shouldn't go to law school. Both options are horrible. It's like asking "Should I stab myself in the eye with an icepick or swallow shards of broken glass?" The only possible answer is "neither."
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Almost all of your law school grades will be determined by a single final and to be a practicing lawyer, you have to pass the bar. If you're not a good test taker, you shouldn't go to law school. The LSAT is a good opportunity for you to learn how to become a better test taker.
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
retake please
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:25 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Don't waste a 3.7 - retake. Touro and Suffolk are both bad choices. Look up employment numbers on LST
- sallysitwell
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:27 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Dear god do not waste that GPA. Look at this: http://www.lstscorereports.com/compare/touro/suffolk/
- 30-Something
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:21 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
If you won't retake and you're only interested in PI, I would implore you to sit out this year's cycle and reapply next year to CUNY Law. Much less expensive than either school... even without a scholarship.
- johnnyquest
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:41 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordhamjohnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
It's much easier to retake the LSAT than it is to transfer.CiaoTat wrote:I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordhamjohnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
- johnnyquest
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
It's way tougher to transfer out of a bad school than it is to increase your score on the LSAT. Keep in mind that everyone will have the same mindset. "I'll just land in the top 10% and transfer." Please realize that 90% of students won't be in the top 10%. Which is what you'll need to transfer to a decent school. RETAKE!CiaoTat wrote:I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordhamjohnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
Edit: Probably a troll, but my point still stands.
Last edited by johnnyquest on Wed May 28, 2014 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- anyriotgirl
- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
unodostres wrote:Flame
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
This is a brand new poster who's asking a question that gets asked here all the time. There's no need to call flame at this point.anyriotgirl wrote:unodostres wrote:Flame
- anyriotgirl
- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
the transfer is really what did it this is paint by numbers whip TLS up into a retake frenzyA. Nony Mouse wrote:This is a brand new poster who's asking a question that gets asked here all the time. There's no need to call flame at this point.anyriotgirl wrote:unodostres wrote:Flame
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Doesn't make the person a flame. It's still a really common attitude for people who aren't on TLS/are relying on e.g. bad UG law school advisors.
Calling flame also doesn't really add anything to the conversation. (Not calling you out particularly, I just think "flame" posts are pointless. If they're flame they just want attention, ignore instead.)
Calling flame also doesn't really add anything to the conversation. (Not calling you out particularly, I just think "flame" posts are pointless. If they're flame they just want attention, ignore instead.)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:33 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Transferring in law school is very different from undergrad, though most 0Ls don't realize that.CiaoTat wrote:I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordhamjohnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
How much will each school cost? How are you paying for it?
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:13 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Go premed at Touro. You ll get a job.
Pmed is the new retake.
Job outlook:20pct
Median pay: $185,000
Pmed is the new retake.
Job outlook:20pct
Median pay: $185,000
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:09 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
But bro, the JD is a million dollar degree. Simkovic said so.Creditisgood wrote:Go premed at Touro. You ll get a job.
Pmed is the new retake.
Job outlook:20pct
Median pay: $185,000
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:45 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
I'm all for advising the best option of the ones the OP presents, but a 151 only leaves two options: retake or don't go.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MistakenGenius
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:18 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by MistakenGenius on Sun Dec 13, 2015 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Young Marino
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Have you spoken to any alumni from each school or attorneys that practice in your desired market? It sounds like Touro is the right call here as their employment score on LST is higher than Suffolk and the employment isn't too bad compared to other schools in the Northeast. I wouldn't dive too deep into the TLS "retake" theory. If you are comfortable with your situation, that's all that matters but I think you should definitely reach out to a few attorneys in your desired market to get some advice. You also shouldn't bank on transferring because you're being graded on a curve so the odds are stacked against you to crack to 20% but Touro is the right call hereCiaoTat wrote:I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship
They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)
Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking
My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration
Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out
Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
I know that railing against the "retake" advice is kind of your shtick, but please don't giving life ruining advice to others like "attend Touro". 50% scholarship still equals six figure debt. A law school with a 148 LSAT median is a scam that is taking advantage of the naive for federal loan money. This place should close and you should stop giving awful advice just to justify your own terrible decisions.Young Marino wrote:Have you spoken to any alumni from each school or attorneys that practice in your desired market? It sounds like Touro is the right call here as their employment score on LST is higher than Suffolk and the employment isn't too bad compared to other schools in the Northeast. I wouldn't dive too deep into the TLS "retake" theory. If you are comfortable with your situation, that's all that matters but I think you should definitely reach out to a few attorneys in your desired market to get some advice. You also shouldn't bank on transferring because you're being graded on a curve so the odds are stacked against you to crack to 20% but Touro is the right call hereCiaoTat wrote:I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship
They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)
Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking
My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration
Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out
Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
Last edited by TheSpanishMain on Thu May 29, 2014 8:49 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Nucky
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:26 pm
Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law
Young Marino, you're possibly the worst poster on TLS. How many lives must you ruin before you're satisfied? Just because you're intent on not retaking and attending a TTTT doesn't mean you should encourage others to make an equally bone-headed decision.Young Marino wrote:Have you spoken to any alumni from each school or attorneys that practice in your desired market? It sounds like Touro is the right call here as their employment score on LST is higher than Suffolk and the employment isn't too bad compared to other schools in the Northeast. I wouldn't dive too deep into the TLS "retake" theory. If you are comfortable with your situation, that's all that matters but I think you should definitely reach out to a few attorneys in your desired market to get some advice. You also shouldn't bank on transferring because you're being graded on a curve so the odds are stacked against you to crack to 20% but Touro is the right call hereCiaoTat wrote:I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship
They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)
Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking
My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration
Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out
Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login