Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )

Touro vs Suffolk

Touro Law
8
42%
Suffolk Law
11
58%
 
Total votes: 19

CiaoTat

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:41 am

Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by CiaoTat » Wed May 28, 2014 12:00 pm

I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship

They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)

Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking

My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration

Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out

Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!

User avatar
Mullens

Silver
Posts: 1138
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by Mullens » Wed May 28, 2014 12:02 pm

Neither. You will ruin your life.

User avatar
TheSpanishMain

Gold
Posts: 4744
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by TheSpanishMain » Wed May 28, 2014 12:04 pm

If you won't retake or truly, honestly feel that a 151 represents the height of your abilities, you shouldn't go to law school. Both options are horrible. It's like asking "Should I stab myself in the eye with an icepick or swallow shards of broken glass?" The only possible answer is "neither."

User avatar
jingosaur

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by jingosaur » Wed May 28, 2014 12:05 pm

Almost all of your law school grades will be determined by a single final and to be a practicing lawyer, you have to pass the bar. If you're not a good test taker, you shouldn't go to law school. The LSAT is a good opportunity for you to learn how to become a better test taker.

User avatar
90convoy

Silver
Posts: 917
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by 90convoy » Wed May 28, 2014 12:07 pm

retake please

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


dkb17xzx

Bronze
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:25 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by dkb17xzx » Wed May 28, 2014 12:16 pm

Don't waste a 3.7 - retake. Touro and Suffolk are both bad choices. Look up employment numbers on LST

User avatar
sallysitwell

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:27 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by sallysitwell » Wed May 28, 2014 12:19 pm

Dear god do not waste that GPA. Look at this: http://www.lstscorereports.com/compare/touro/suffolk/

User avatar
30-Something

Bronze
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:21 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by 30-Something » Wed May 28, 2014 12:19 pm

If you won't retake and you're only interested in PI, I would implore you to sit out this year's cycle and reapply next year to CUNY Law. Much less expensive than either school... even without a scholarship.

User avatar
johnnyquest

Bronze
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by johnnyquest » Wed May 28, 2014 12:21 pm

I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


CiaoTat

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:41 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by CiaoTat » Wed May 28, 2014 12:26 pm

johnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordham

User avatar
TheSpanishMain

Gold
Posts: 4744
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by TheSpanishMain » Wed May 28, 2014 12:29 pm

CiaoTat wrote:
johnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordham
It's much easier to retake the LSAT than it is to transfer.

User avatar
unodostres

Silver
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by unodostres » Wed May 28, 2014 12:29 pm

Flame

User avatar
johnnyquest

Bronze
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by johnnyquest » Wed May 28, 2014 12:32 pm

CiaoTat wrote:
johnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordham
It's way tougher to transfer out of a bad school than it is to increase your score on the LSAT. Keep in mind that everyone will have the same mindset. "I'll just land in the top 10% and transfer." Please realize that 90% of students won't be in the top 10%. Which is what you'll need to transfer to a decent school. RETAKE!

Edit: Probably a troll, but my point still stands.
Last edited by johnnyquest on Wed May 28, 2014 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by anyriotgirl » Wed May 28, 2014 12:33 pm

unodostres wrote:Flame

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Wed May 28, 2014 12:54 pm

anyriotgirl wrote:
unodostres wrote:Flame
This is a brand new poster who's asking a question that gets asked here all the time. There's no need to call flame at this point.

User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by anyriotgirl » Wed May 28, 2014 12:58 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote:
unodostres wrote:Flame
This is a brand new poster who's asking a question that gets asked here all the time. There's no need to call flame at this point.
the transfer is really what did it this is paint by numbers whip TLS up into a retake frenzy

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Wed May 28, 2014 1:00 pm

Doesn't make the person a flame. It's still a really common attitude for people who aren't on TLS/are relying on e.g. bad UG law school advisors.

Calling flame also doesn't really add anything to the conversation. (Not calling you out particularly, I just think "flame" posts are pointless. If they're flame they just want attention, ignore instead.)

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


NYSprague

Silver
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:33 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by NYSprague » Wed May 28, 2014 1:05 pm

CiaoTat wrote:
johnnyquest wrote:I know it sucks to wait a year. But the LSAT is a very learnable test. Follow the study tips and advice on this forum and I promise your score will increase. Ask yourself this question: Would you rather have one shitty year (studying for retake) or 40 shitty years because you went to a worthless law school?
I was thinking of transferring by demonstration of my grades / class rank --I really wanted CUNY or Fordham
Transferring in law school is very different from undergrad, though most 0Ls don't realize that.

How much will each school cost? How are you paying for it?

Creditisgood

New
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:13 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by Creditisgood » Wed May 28, 2014 1:18 pm

Go premed at Touro. You ll get a job.
Pmed is the new retake.
Job outlook:20pct
Median pay: $185,000

rwhyAn

Bronze
Posts: 335
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:09 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by rwhyAn » Wed May 28, 2014 1:25 pm

Creditisgood wrote:Go premed at Touro. You ll get a job.
Pmed is the new retake.
Job outlook:20pct
Median pay: $185,000
But bro, the JD is a million dollar degree. Simkovic said so.

HRomanus

Silver
Posts: 1307
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:45 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by HRomanus » Wed May 28, 2014 10:46 pm

I'm all for advising the best option of the ones the OP presents, but a 151 only leaves two options: retake or don't go.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
MistakenGenius

Silver
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:18 pm

Post removed.

Post by MistakenGenius » Wed May 28, 2014 10:55 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by MistakenGenius on Sun Dec 13, 2015 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Young Marino

Silver
Posts: 1136
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by Young Marino » Thu May 29, 2014 8:35 am

CiaoTat wrote:I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship

They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)

Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking

My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration

Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out

Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
Have you spoken to any alumni from each school or attorneys that practice in your desired market? It sounds like Touro is the right call here as their employment score on LST is higher than Suffolk and the employment isn't too bad compared to other schools in the Northeast. I wouldn't dive too deep into the TLS "retake" theory. If you are comfortable with your situation, that's all that matters but I think you should definitely reach out to a few attorneys in your desired market to get some advice. You also shouldn't bank on transferring because you're being graded on a curve so the odds are stacked against you to crack to 20% but Touro is the right call here

User avatar
TheSpanishMain

Gold
Posts: 4744
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by TheSpanishMain » Thu May 29, 2014 8:44 am

Young Marino wrote:
CiaoTat wrote:I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship

They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)

Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking

My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration

Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out

Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
Have you spoken to any alumni from each school or attorneys that practice in your desired market? It sounds like Touro is the right call here as their employment score on LST is higher than Suffolk and the employment isn't too bad compared to other schools in the Northeast. I wouldn't dive too deep into the TLS "retake" theory. If you are comfortable with your situation, that's all that matters but I think you should definitely reach out to a few attorneys in your desired market to get some advice. You also shouldn't bank on transferring because you're being graded on a curve so the odds are stacked against you to crack to 20% but Touro is the right call here
I know that railing against the "retake" advice is kind of your shtick, but please don't giving life ruining advice to others like "attend Touro". 50% scholarship still equals six figure debt. A law school with a 148 LSAT median is a scam that is taking advantage of the naive for federal loan money. This place should close and you should stop giving awful advice just to justify your own terrible decisions.
Last edited by TheSpanishMain on Thu May 29, 2014 8:49 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Nucky

Silver
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:26 pm

Re: Touro Law vs. Suffolk Law

Post by Nucky » Thu May 29, 2014 8:46 am

Young Marino wrote:
CiaoTat wrote:I have to decide by Monday where to go
Suffolk 60% scholarship
Touro 50% scholarship

They end up total cost about the same.
GPA: 3.7 LSAT 151 (that was best I could do...not for me to retake)

Main concentration: Public Interest and Immigration / Sex Trafficking

My current Pro and Cons are:
Pro:
Touro: Class size = big fish small pond. People are so welcoming and have non-profits and agencies located inside law school. LIRR to NYC
Suffolk: Already in the city, variety of clinical, pro bono opportunities directly in my concentration

Con:
Touro: More remote suburban area, less recognition as law school since its so new
Suffolk: Double class size, more competitive to stand out

Please let me know what your thoughts are. Greatly appreciate it!
Have you spoken to any alumni from each school or attorneys that practice in your desired market? It sounds like Touro is the right call here as their employment score on LST is higher than Suffolk and the employment isn't too bad compared to other schools in the Northeast. I wouldn't dive too deep into the TLS "retake" theory. If you are comfortable with your situation, that's all that matters but I think you should definitely reach out to a few attorneys in your desired market to get some advice. You also shouldn't bank on transferring because you're being graded on a curve so the odds are stacked against you to crack to 20% but Touro is the right call here
Young Marino, you're possibly the worst poster on TLS. How many lives must you ruin before you're satisfied? Just because you're intent on not retaking and attending a TTTT doesn't mean you should encourage others to make an equally bone-headed decision.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”