The value of ASWs Forum
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
The value of ASWs
I continually see posts in this part of the forum where people state that they've fallen in love with a certain school after attending their ASW, and it seems like this experience is often used as the basis for their decision to attend that school (even though it also seems like many of these people didn't go to other ASWs and may have had the same experience at those).
I've always been skeptical of ASWs though. They seem like exercises in marketing, and rather than applicants making decisions based only on employment differences, available programs, debt incurred, etc., how much fun they had at the event (which is often based on who had the best food/alcohol and interactions with a limited number of other applicants) seems to come into play as a decision making criterion.
Can sometime tell me why people should be attending ASWs when trying to choose a law school? To those who go to these, what did you get out of them?
I've always been skeptical of ASWs though. They seem like exercises in marketing, and rather than applicants making decisions based only on employment differences, available programs, debt incurred, etc., how much fun they had at the event (which is often based on who had the best food/alcohol and interactions with a limited number of other applicants) seems to come into play as a decision making criterion.
Can sometime tell me why people should be attending ASWs when trying to choose a law school? To those who go to these, what did you get out of them?
- Pneumonia
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
For me the value was more in making sure that I didn't hate a certain school rather than in seeing which one I liked more.
- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
The way I saw it, one of those schools was going to be sucking 3 years and potentially thousands of dollars out of me, so the least they could do is give me some free booze and a t-shirt.
And, like Pneumonia said, I just wanted to make sure I didn't hate the place/culture.
Even though "fit" shouldn't be a major factor, I think you're rolling the dice by not at least visiting a school before matriculating.
Plus, free booze.
And, like Pneumonia said, I just wanted to make sure I didn't hate the place/culture.
Even though "fit" shouldn't be a major factor, I think you're rolling the dice by not at least visiting a school before matriculating.
Plus, free booze.
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
I can only really see it mattering if you're deciding between two peer schools at equal costs. Like, if you're deciding between USC and UCLA with the same COA at each, it really comes down to which area you like more and the culture of the place. But most of the time, employment data and cost should override the "I fell in love with the place" thing.
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
It can be helpful to check out the area and neighborhood, figure out where you might want to live, and to just have some sort of idea or picture in your head of where you will be spending the next 3 years at. I agree, though, that you can't really put very much stock into ASWs for the purposes of deciding between schools in most situations. I agree with the poster who said that maybe in really close cases it might push you one way or the other, but that's about that.
ASWs aren't representing of being in law school, except for maybe sitting in on an actual class.
ASWs aren't representing of being in law school, except for maybe sitting in on an actual class.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
I'm going to go against popular opinion here and say that ASWs were immensely helpful in my decisionmaking process this cycle. Sure, ASWs are basically exercises in propaganda, but I do think you get a "feel" for the school, and being able to speak to a significant number of current students one-on-one was pretty helpful/insightful. I also went out of my way to ask the current students I spoke to whether they went to ASW before they made their decision, and if so, if they felt that the impression they got of the school during ASW lined up with their actual experience (basically all of them said yes).
One ASW I went to was at a school that I had huge reservations about coming in to the cycle, and was not even in my top 3 at the start of the cycle. I am now 99% certain I'll be going to that school, and going to their ASW helped dispel some major (unwarranted) concerns I had about the school.
One ASW I went to was at a school that was in my top 3 coming into the cycle, and I was sure I'd love the school during ASW. I didn't. This was a major surprise, but I'm glad I figured it out now rather than in September.
Also, someone close to me went to the ASW 3 cycles ago of the same school I'll (almost certainly) be attending and absolutely hated it. Different strokes for different folks and all that.
One ASW I went to was at a school that I had huge reservations about coming in to the cycle, and was not even in my top 3 at the start of the cycle. I am now 99% certain I'll be going to that school, and going to their ASW helped dispel some major (unwarranted) concerns I had about the school.
One ASW I went to was at a school that was in my top 3 coming into the cycle, and I was sure I'd love the school during ASW. I didn't. This was a major surprise, but I'm glad I figured it out now rather than in September.
Also, someone close to me went to the ASW 3 cycles ago of the same school I'll (almost certainly) be attending and absolutely hated it. Different strokes for different folks and all that.
- Nonconsecutive
- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
This was pretty much how I viewed it as well. I only went to a the ASW of those schools that I was seriously considering and by that I mean the final choices. Primarily because of finances but also because my mind was pretty much made up based on things such as placement, cost, etc. The ASW was essentially to make sure I didn't seriously despise the school or the location. In fact, the ASW was more about seeing the area I'd be living in than the law program itself. All the free stuff and the stipends were just icing on the cake.Pneumonia wrote:For me the value was more in making sure that I didn't hate a certain school rather than in seeing which one I liked more.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: The value of ASWs
I agree with You Dumb Dildo. If two schools have equivalent placement power + COAs and you'd be happy in either geography, then simply liking a place more is a reasonable tiebreaker.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that. Didn't do so for grad school, either - went with the most secure stipend at a reasonable school that did my specialty.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that. Didn't do so for grad school, either - went with the most secure stipend at a reasonable school that did my specialty.
Last edited by cron1834 on Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Ramius
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am
Re: The value of ASWs
This is the only time it matters. If you're picking a professional school based on feel, you're doing it wrong. Pick based on getting the job you want to get for a reasonable cost. I, personally, could give a damn about things like collegiality and other buzzwords thrown around in admissions. All that matters is getting the job I'm trying to get.TheSpanishMain wrote:I can only really see it mattering if you're deciding between two peer schools at equal costs. Like, if you're deciding between USC and UCLA with the same COA at each, it really comes down to which area you like more and the culture of the place. But most of the time, employment data and cost should override the "I fell in love with the place" thing.
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
Well, I think you have some reasonable leeway. Like if you're picking one of CCN and you've been admitted to all 3, or one of HYS, etc. Even if costs of attendance aren't identical (but in the same ballpark). It's still 3 years of your life and you want to be happy. But you also want to be happy and employed afterward.cron1834 wrote:I agree with You Dumb Dildo. If two schools have equivalent placement power + COAs and you'd be happy in either geography, then simply liking a place more is a reasonable tiebreaker.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: The value of ASWs
Yeah, if they're ballpark, this sounds convincing. The two Cs are obviously peers, though the geography you desire is going to matter. But if you "fell in love" with Ann Arbor during ASW and have it for a similar cost (sometimes finaid is weird)? No way.ph14 wrote:Well, I think you have some reasonable leeway. Like if you're picking one of CCN and you've been admitted to all 3, or one of HYS, etc. Even if costs of attendance aren't identical (but in the same ballpark). It's still 3 years of your life and you want to be happy. But you also want to be happy and employed afterward.cron1834 wrote:I agree with You Dumb Dildo. If two schools have equivalent placement power + COAs and you'd be happy in either geography, then simply liking a place more is a reasonable tiebreaker.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
How do you feel about swag?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ramius
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am
Re: The value of ASWs
I think we're splitting hairs at this point. For each person, the calculus will be different when we're talking about T14 at marginally similar costs. Depending on goals and current situation, the difference is truly marginal. The more important point is focusing on whether the two schools are truly peers and whether either of them are worth the cost at the time of decision. If they provide an equal chance at the job you want at an equal cost, you can absolutely pick based on "feel," but other than that, pick based on what is right for your goals and your financial situation.ph14 wrote:Well, I think you have some reasonable leeway. Like if you're picking one of CCN and you've been admitted to all 3, or one of HYS, etc. Even if costs of attendance aren't identical (but in the same ballpark). It's still 3 years of your life and you want to be happy. But you also want to be happy and employed afterward.cron1834 wrote:I agree with You Dumb Dildo. If two schools have equivalent placement power + COAs and you'd be happy in either geography, then simply liking a place more is a reasonable tiebreaker.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that.
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
Splitting hairs is what you do in law school and as a lawyer.matthewsean85 wrote:I think we're splitting hairs at this point. For each person, the calculus will be different when we're talking about T14 at marginally similar costs. Depending on goals and current situation, the difference is truly marginal. The more important point is focusing on whether the two schools are truly peers and whether either of them are worth the cost at the time of decision. If they provide an equal chance at the job you want at an equal cost, you can absolutely pick based on "feel," but other than that, pick based on what is right for your goals and your financial situation.ph14 wrote:Well, I think you have some reasonable leeway. Like if you're picking one of CCN and you've been admitted to all 3, or one of HYS, etc. Even if costs of attendance aren't identical (but in the same ballpark). It's still 3 years of your life and you want to be happy. But you also want to be happy and employed afterward.cron1834 wrote:I agree with You Dumb Dildo. If two schools have equivalent placement power + COAs and you'd be happy in either geography, then simply liking a place more is a reasonable tiebreaker.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
Disagree, I think it's actually the other way around, the differences career wise are marginally different, but where you live and attend is pretty important..matthewsean85 wrote:I think we're splitting hairs at this point. For each person, the calculus will be different when we're talking about T14 at marginally similar costs. Depending on goals and current situation, the difference is truly marginal. The more important point is focusing on whether the two schools are truly peers and whether either of them are worth the cost at the time of decision. If they provide an equal chance at the job you want at an equal cost, you can absolutely pick based on "feel," but other than that, pick based on what is right for your goals and your financial situation.ph14 wrote:Well, I think you have some reasonable leeway. Like if you're picking one of CCN and you've been admitted to all 3, or one of HYS, etc. Even if costs of attendance aren't identical (but in the same ballpark). It's still 3 years of your life and you want to be happy. But you also want to be happy and employed afterward.cron1834 wrote:I agree with You Dumb Dildo. If two schools have equivalent placement power + COAs and you'd be happy in either geography, then simply liking a place more is a reasonable tiebreaker.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
I agree with ph14 that the essential value of the ASW is for testing whether you could actually live in the location for 3 years. "Loving" the ASW is not as important as not hating it.
ASW's are far less important at schools you are familiar with in cities and geographic regions you've visited many times. For example, I would not have packed my shit up and gone to Duke without seeing Durham first. I just wouldn't - I'd never even been to North Carolina except one grounded flight in Greensboro when I was eleven. Similarly, I would want to see and experience Chicago before heading to NU or Chi; the city would seem to form a large part of the experience. Whereas I was a little more familiar with New York, Cambridge, and San Francisco so those experiences would be far less critical.
ASW's are far less important at schools you are familiar with in cities and geographic regions you've visited many times. For example, I would not have packed my shit up and gone to Duke without seeing Durham first. I just wouldn't - I'd never even been to North Carolina except one grounded flight in Greensboro when I was eleven. Similarly, I would want to see and experience Chicago before heading to NU or Chi; the city would seem to form a large part of the experience. Whereas I was a little more familiar with New York, Cambridge, and San Francisco so those experiences would be far less critical.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Ramius
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am
Re: The value of ASWs
I guess I conveyed it poorly, because this is mostly what I meant. What I was talking about was saying, "my goal is X (for argument, let's call X=DC biglaw, just for giggles), and school Y does marginally better to get me X, so maybe picking school Y is better than school Z, even though school Z has better general placement than school Y." This can even go into what you prefer for an environment, but mostly I think it should focus on pushing toward the outcome you're looking for in attending law school if the costs are substantially the same.Clearly wrote:Disagree, I think it's actually the other way around, the differences career wise are marginally different, but where you live and attend is pretty important..matthewsean85 wrote:I think we're splitting hairs at this point. For each person, the calculus will be different when we're talking about T14 at marginally similar costs. Depending on goals and current situation, the difference is truly marginal. The more important point is focusing on whether the two schools are truly peers and whether either of them are worth the cost at the time of decision. If they provide an equal chance at the job you want at an equal cost, you can absolutely pick based on "feel," but other than that, pick based on what is right for your goals and your financial situation.ph14 wrote:Well, I think you have some reasonable leeway. Like if you're picking one of CCN and you've been admitted to all 3, or one of HYS, etc. Even if costs of attendance aren't identical (but in the same ballpark). It's still 3 years of your life and you want to be happy. But you also want to be happy and employed afterward.cron1834 wrote:I agree with You Dumb Dildo. If two schools have equivalent placement power + COAs and you'd be happy in either geography, then simply liking a place more is a reasonable tiebreaker.
That said, I can't possibly justify picking a school with worse placement and cost just because you vibe better there, or bc you heard something from some 1L who couldn't care less about your outcomes. That's decision-making that only the wealthy can afford. I'm a 0L, and I would nevernever do that.
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
cron1834 wrote:I agree with You Dumb Dildo.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: The value of ASWs
Haha, I always forget that you have an actual handle.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:29 pm
Re: The value of ASWs
A dildo with an actual handle... not so dumb if you think about itcron1834 wrote:Haha, I always forget that you have an actual handle.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login