UCLA vs. GULC vs. CORNELL
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:50 am
Hi TLSers! I'm hoping to get off several waitlists, but in the meantime, I'm considering my current acceptances. I've been combing through articles and TLS threads to make the decision process easier, but to no avail. Any advice is greatly appreciated!
I've been reading a wide variety of conflicting opinions about which is the better national choice and which is the better Northern California choice. Here's a list of pros/cons I've compiled:
UCLA: Amazing weather but terrible LA traffic. Regional school with a definite strong advantage over Georgetown and Cornell in the Southern California/Los Angeles area (but what about Northern California?)
Georgetown: Strong public interest and governmental connections. Large class size which means more competition in the area. Upbeat, urban location with more cultural and recreational activities as well as internship opportunities in the area.
Cornell: Strong feeder school into corporate BigLaw in the NY area (even against NYU and Columbia?) Small class size which allows it to achieve a higher employment rate. Higher ranking. Terrible weather/location.
While I love UCLA's weather, I dislike living in LA and would be open to experiencing a new environment in either Washington D.C. or NYC (post-Cornell). I would like to either work in Northern California right after school or eventually. Because I'm interested in both corporate BigLaw/international human rights but would like to keep all doors open just in case, I'm curious as to which school has the greatest national recognition and which school would have the greatest pull in Northern California. Are Georgetown and Cornell's higher rankings "worth" turning down UCLA and moving for law school (I am currently in LA) - as in, is it more difficult to attend UCLA and work on the east coast or more difficult to attend Georgetown/Cornell and work on the west cost?
So much to consider - thank you for reading and answering!!!
I've been reading a wide variety of conflicting opinions about which is the better national choice and which is the better Northern California choice. Here's a list of pros/cons I've compiled:
UCLA: Amazing weather but terrible LA traffic. Regional school with a definite strong advantage over Georgetown and Cornell in the Southern California/Los Angeles area (but what about Northern California?)
Georgetown: Strong public interest and governmental connections. Large class size which means more competition in the area. Upbeat, urban location with more cultural and recreational activities as well as internship opportunities in the area.
Cornell: Strong feeder school into corporate BigLaw in the NY area (even against NYU and Columbia?) Small class size which allows it to achieve a higher employment rate. Higher ranking. Terrible weather/location.
While I love UCLA's weather, I dislike living in LA and would be open to experiencing a new environment in either Washington D.C. or NYC (post-Cornell). I would like to either work in Northern California right after school or eventually. Because I'm interested in both corporate BigLaw/international human rights but would like to keep all doors open just in case, I'm curious as to which school has the greatest national recognition and which school would have the greatest pull in Northern California. Are Georgetown and Cornell's higher rankings "worth" turning down UCLA and moving for law school (I am currently in LA) - as in, is it more difficult to attend UCLA and work on the east coast or more difficult to attend Georgetown/Cornell and work on the west cost?
So much to consider - thank you for reading and answering!!!