Berkeley (Sticker) vs. NYU (50k) vs. UCLA (120k)
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 1:32 am
Berkeley: Total 3 year COA ~ 220k
NYU: Total 3 year COA ~ 193k
UCLA: Total 3 year COA ~ 78k
I am very fortunate to be able to consider some amazing schools. The three that I am mostly looking at right now are Berkeley, NYU, and UCLA. Berkeley has always been my dream school (I went there for undergrad and have lived in the East Bay my whole life), but I really wasn't expecting to be admitted. I was very happy to be amongst the Valentines Day admits from Faculty Review, and I was also accepted to UCLA a few days prior to that.
I was accepted to NYU in December, and I thought, with Berkeley being a long shot for admission, this was likely where I would want to end up. Since December I have been learning more about the law school, and have been very impressed with the opportunities it presents and the general vibe of the school.
My goals are pretty flexible right now. I would be very interested in doing public interest work in environmental law, but I am also very much open to seeing what interests I develop during law school. I want to keep BigLaw and federal clerkships an option. I also have a very very strong desire to return to the Bay Area for employment. If not the Bay, I want to work in LA. I do not have any interest in working in NYC.
Berkeley is my dream, but that is a very large amount of debt. NYU is amazing as well, but I worry about being able to make it back to CA. Also, with only a $50k total scholarship and a higher cost of living and moving expenses, it is only marginally cheaper than Berk in the grand scheme of the total debt load. However, it is also higher-ranked and it looks like it has better employment outcomes. I could potentially try to negotiate the NYU scholarship higher once I get financial aid from more schools, but this offer was already much more than I was expecting.
I submitted a Matching Scholarship form to Berkeley asking for them to match the NYU scholarship, but I will most likely not end up with any money from them. With my stats, 3.4 gpa and 177 lsat non-urm, I think I was lucky enough just to be admitted and that luck won't extend to financial aid.
In addition, I have a SO who has a well-paying job in the Bay Area. However, she is willing to look for work in a new city (she is bored with her current job). She is able to offset some of my COA. This will be easier from Berkeley since she already has a steady income here.
I threw UCLA on the list because of my desire to work in CA, and the substantial $120k scholarship they offered.
I have also been accepted to Michigan with $54k, Vanderbilt with $80k, and Columbia, Georgetown, Virginia, and Duke without financial aid offers yet. I am also currently still pending at Harvard since early October without a JS1.
All advice is welcome. Thanks!
TL;DR - Would I be making a mistake by paying more money to go to Berkeley over NYU if I want to work in CA? Is a significant scholarship from UCLA worth its lower employment prospects?
NYU: Total 3 year COA ~ 193k
UCLA: Total 3 year COA ~ 78k
I am very fortunate to be able to consider some amazing schools. The three that I am mostly looking at right now are Berkeley, NYU, and UCLA. Berkeley has always been my dream school (I went there for undergrad and have lived in the East Bay my whole life), but I really wasn't expecting to be admitted. I was very happy to be amongst the Valentines Day admits from Faculty Review, and I was also accepted to UCLA a few days prior to that.
I was accepted to NYU in December, and I thought, with Berkeley being a long shot for admission, this was likely where I would want to end up. Since December I have been learning more about the law school, and have been very impressed with the opportunities it presents and the general vibe of the school.
My goals are pretty flexible right now. I would be very interested in doing public interest work in environmental law, but I am also very much open to seeing what interests I develop during law school. I want to keep BigLaw and federal clerkships an option. I also have a very very strong desire to return to the Bay Area for employment. If not the Bay, I want to work in LA. I do not have any interest in working in NYC.
Berkeley is my dream, but that is a very large amount of debt. NYU is amazing as well, but I worry about being able to make it back to CA. Also, with only a $50k total scholarship and a higher cost of living and moving expenses, it is only marginally cheaper than Berk in the grand scheme of the total debt load. However, it is also higher-ranked and it looks like it has better employment outcomes. I could potentially try to negotiate the NYU scholarship higher once I get financial aid from more schools, but this offer was already much more than I was expecting.
I submitted a Matching Scholarship form to Berkeley asking for them to match the NYU scholarship, but I will most likely not end up with any money from them. With my stats, 3.4 gpa and 177 lsat non-urm, I think I was lucky enough just to be admitted and that luck won't extend to financial aid.
In addition, I have a SO who has a well-paying job in the Bay Area. However, she is willing to look for work in a new city (she is bored with her current job). She is able to offset some of my COA. This will be easier from Berkeley since she already has a steady income here.
I threw UCLA on the list because of my desire to work in CA, and the substantial $120k scholarship they offered.
I have also been accepted to Michigan with $54k, Vanderbilt with $80k, and Columbia, Georgetown, Virginia, and Duke without financial aid offers yet. I am also currently still pending at Harvard since early October without a JS1.
All advice is welcome. Thanks!
TL;DR - Would I be making a mistake by paying more money to go to Berkeley over NYU if I want to work in CA? Is a significant scholarship from UCLA worth its lower employment prospects?