Top Law Schools

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.

I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.

Which would you pick and why?

Thank you very much.

Yanky91 wrote:

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.

I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.

Which would you pick and why?

Thank you very much.

It really depends on what you want to do and where you want to be. UCLA is super expensive (same with Emory). Without a scholarship, I do not think it is worth it. Both UCLA and Emory are great schools, and you have a good shot at getting a job at a big firm (if that's what you mean by nice firm) from both. Your chances of getting a Biglaw job out of UCLA are higher though. Last year 37.9% of the graduates were employed in law firms consisting of more than 500 lawyers (Which is pretty high. That's like American's overall employment). Emory on the other hand had 23.5% of the class get jobs at firms that employ more than 500 lawyers. In addition, the median private sector starting salary for UCLA is $145,000 whereas for Emory it's $90,000. Overall, you have a better shot at a Biglaw job with a much higher salary coming out of UCLA. In my opinion you should try to squeeze a scholarship out of one of them. Emory is obviously better for a job in Atlanta. I would not pay sticker for either.

AT9 wrote:East coast or west coast? Southern CA or Atlanta? Cost aside, that seems to be the clear determining factor to me.

Yanky91 wrote:

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.

I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.

Which would you pick and why?

Thank you very much.

It really depends on what you want to do and where you want to be. UCLA is super expensive (same with Emory). Without a scholarship, I do not think it is worth it. Both UCLA and Emory are great schools, and you have a good shot at getting a job at a big firm (if that's what you mean by nice firm) from both. Your chances of getting a Biglaw job out of UCLA are higher though. Last year 37.9% of the graduates were employed in law firms consisting of more than 500 lawyers (Which is pretty high. That's like American's overall employment). Emory on the other hand had 23.5% of the class get jobs at firms that employ more than 500 lawyers. In addition, the median private sector starting salary for UCLA is $145,000 whereas for Emory it's $90,000. Overall, you have a better shot at a Biglaw job with a much higher salary coming out of UCLA. In my opinion you should try to squeeze a scholarship out of one of them. Emory is obviously better for a job in Atlanta. I would not pay sticker for either.

Nucky wrote:

Yanky91 wrote:

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.

I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.

Which would you pick and why?

Thank you very much.

It really depends on what you want to do and where you want to be. UCLA is super expensive (same with Emory). Without a scholarship, I do not think it is worth it. Both UCLA and Emory are great schools, and you have a good shot at getting a job at a big firm (if that's what you mean by nice firm) from both. Your chances of getting a Biglaw job out of UCLA are higher though. Last year 37.9% of the graduates were employed in law firms consisting of more than 500 lawyers (Which is pretty high. That's like American's overall employment). Emory on the other hand had 23.5% of the class get jobs at firms that employ more than 500 lawyers. In addition, the median private sector starting salary for UCLA is $145,000 whereas for Emory it's $90,000. Overall, you have a better shot at a Biglaw job with a much higher salary coming out of UCLA. In my opinion you should try to squeeze a scholarship out of one of them. Emory is obviously better for a job in Atlanta. I would not pay sticker for either.

Thanks! The COA in UCLA isnt too bad. They're paying half my tuition and I can live my parents (sigh, but free rent woo) since I went there for my undergrad.

Just want to add to the above by saying that UCLA has a higher starting salary but when you're discussing SoCal I think COL has to play a role in your decision making process as well.

Either way, congrats on getting into UCLA! Two great options are not a bad thing to have. Good luck with your decision!

unodostres wrote:If you don't want to stay in California, you should not go to UCLA. You should retake if you want biglaw.

By the way, do you mind sharing your numbers? I'm looking at LA and SC.

sublime wrote:

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:

unodostres wrote:If you don't want to stay in California, you should not go to UCLA. You should retake if you want biglaw.

By the way, do you mind sharing your numbers? I'm looking at LA and SC.

Sure, my numbers weren't all that great to be honest.

GPA: 3.9
LSAT: 163

I kind of lucked out eh?

Wow. Expected higher for half at UCLA

(No disrespect, of course)

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:@California: I applied to 16 schools in the top 25.

@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...

@unodos: No URM

unodostres wrote:

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:@California: I applied to 16 schools in the top 25.

@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...

@unodos: No URM

Cool! Thanks man.

Speaking of delaying. You have to trust these forums when delaying for another year could mean the difference b/w hundreds of thousands of dollars both in saving money and making.

WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...