UCLA vs. Emory Forum
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
UCLA vs. Emory
Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.
I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.
Which would you pick and why?
Thank you very much.
I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.
Which would you pick and why?
Thank you very much.
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 7:04 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
It really depends on what you want to do and where you want to be. UCLA is super expensive (same with Emory). Without a scholarship, I do not think it is worth it. Both UCLA and Emory are great schools, and you have a good shot at getting a job at a big firm (if that's what you mean by nice firm) from both. Your chances of getting a Biglaw job out of UCLA are higher though. Last year 37.9% of the graduates were employed in law firms consisting of more than 500 lawyers (Which is pretty high. That's like American's overall employment). Emory on the other hand had 23.5% of the class get jobs at firms that employ more than 500 lawyers. In addition, the median private sector starting salary for UCLA is $145,000 whereas for Emory it's $90,000. Overall, you have a better shot at a Biglaw job with a much higher salary coming out of UCLA. In my opinion you should try to squeeze a scholarship out of one of them. Emory is obviously better for a job in Atlanta. I would not pay sticker for either.WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.
I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.
Which would you pick and why?
Thank you very much.
- AT9
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
East coast or west coast? Southern CA or Atlanta? Cost aside, that seems to be the clear determining factor to me.
- Nucky
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:26 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Just want to add to the above by saying that UCLA has a higher starting salary but when you're discussing SoCal I think COL has to play a role in your decision making process as well.Yanky91 wrote:It really depends on what you want to do and where you want to be. UCLA is super expensive (same with Emory). Without a scholarship, I do not think it is worth it. Both UCLA and Emory are great schools, and you have a good shot at getting a job at a big firm (if that's what you mean by nice firm) from both. Your chances of getting a Biglaw job out of UCLA are higher though. Last year 37.9% of the graduates were employed in law firms consisting of more than 500 lawyers (Which is pretty high. That's like American's overall employment). Emory on the other hand had 23.5% of the class get jobs at firms that employ more than 500 lawyers. In addition, the median private sector starting salary for UCLA is $145,000 whereas for Emory it's $90,000. Overall, you have a better shot at a Biglaw job with a much higher salary coming out of UCLA. In my opinion you should try to squeeze a scholarship out of one of them. Emory is obviously better for a job in Atlanta. I would not pay sticker for either.WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.
I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.
Which would you pick and why?
Thank you very much.
Either way, congrats on getting into UCLA! Two great options are not a bad thing to have. Good luck with your decision!
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
East Coast for sure. I hate California. I'm ok with going to school here, but I don't want to stay. My heart is for the east coast.AT9 wrote:East coast or west coast? Southern CA or Atlanta? Cost aside, that seems to be the clear determining factor to me.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Thank you very much for your response. UCLA is giving me about half of tuition in grants. I don't know what's going on with Emory yet. Thank you very much for your response.Yanky91 wrote:It really depends on what you want to do and where you want to be. UCLA is super expensive (same with Emory). Without a scholarship, I do not think it is worth it. Both UCLA and Emory are great schools, and you have a good shot at getting a job at a big firm (if that's what you mean by nice firm) from both. Your chances of getting a Biglaw job out of UCLA are higher though. Last year 37.9% of the graduates were employed in law firms consisting of more than 500 lawyers (Which is pretty high. That's like American's overall employment). Emory on the other hand had 23.5% of the class get jobs at firms that employ more than 500 lawyers. In addition, the median private sector starting salary for UCLA is $145,000 whereas for Emory it's $90,000. Overall, you have a better shot at a Biglaw job with a much higher salary coming out of UCLA. In my opinion you should try to squeeze a scholarship out of one of them. Emory is obviously better for a job in Atlanta. I would not pay sticker for either.WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.
I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.
Which would you pick and why?
Thank you very much.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Nucky wrote:Thanks! The COA in UCLA isnt too bad. They're paying half my tuition and I can live my parents (sigh, but free rent woo) since I went there for my undergrad.Yanky91 wrote:It really depends on what you want to do and where you want to be. UCLA is super expensive (same with Emory). Without a scholarship, I do not think it is worth it. Both UCLA and Emory are great schools, and you have a good shot at getting a job at a big firm (if that's what you mean by nice firm) from both. Your chances of getting a Biglaw job out of UCLA are higher though. Last year 37.9% of the graduates were employed in law firms consisting of more than 500 lawyers (Which is pretty high. That's like American's overall employment). Emory on the other hand had 23.5% of the class get jobs at firms that employ more than 500 lawyers. In addition, the median private sector starting salary for UCLA is $145,000 whereas for Emory it's $90,000. Overall, you have a better shot at a Biglaw job with a much higher salary coming out of UCLA. In my opinion you should try to squeeze a scholarship out of one of them. Emory is obviously better for a job in Atlanta. I would not pay sticker for either.WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Alright, so my girlfriend doesn't believe me when I say that UCLA will give me a better chance at being admitted to a nice law firm. She says all along the East Coast and Atlanta, Emory would be better for getting a job. I really disagree with her, but I thought I would turn to you guys since many of you have done more research than I have in this.
I got into UCLA, I still haven't heard back from Emory but I expect to get in.
Which would you pick and why?
Thank you very much.
Just want to add to the above by saying that UCLA has a higher starting salary but when you're discussing SoCal I think COL has to play a role in your decision making process as well.
Either way, congrats on getting into UCLA! Two great options are not a bad thing to have. Good luck with your decision!
- unodostres
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
If you don't want to stay in California, you should not go to UCLA. You should retake if you want biglaw.
By the way, do you mind sharing your numbers? I'm looking at LA and SC.
By the way, do you mind sharing your numbers? I'm looking at LA and SC.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Sure, my numbers weren't all that great to be honest.unodostres wrote:If you don't want to stay in California, you should not go to UCLA. You should retake if you want biglaw.
By the way, do you mind sharing your numbers? I'm looking at LA and SC.
GPA: 3.9
LSAT: 163
I kind of lucked out eh?
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Both are regional schools NOT located in the region you want to practice...where else did you apply?
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
You have a 3.9? Retake dude and go to Vandy for free or Duke with $$$.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
None taken.sublime wrote:WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:Sure, my numbers weren't all that great to be honest.unodostres wrote:If you don't want to stay in California, you should not go to UCLA. You should retake if you want biglaw.
By the way, do you mind sharing your numbers? I'm looking at LA and SC.
GPA: 3.9
LSAT: 163
I kind of lucked out eh?
Wow. Expected higher for half at UCLA
(No disrespect, of course)
- unodostres
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
URM?
Some awesome $$$ for those numbers.
Some awesome $$$ for those numbers.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
@California: I applied to 16 schools in the top 25.
@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...
@unodos: No URM
@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...
@unodos: No URM
- unodostres
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Cool! Thanks man.WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:@California: I applied to 16 schools in the top 25.
@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...
@unodos: No URM
Speaking of delaying. You have to trust these forums when delaying for another year could mean the difference b/w hundreds of thousands of dollars both in saving money and making.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:17 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Yes ... very true. It's something I'll think about tonight.unodostres wrote:Cool! Thanks man.WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:@California: I applied to 16 schools in the top 25.
@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...
@unodos: No URM
Speaking of delaying. You have to trust these forums when delaying for another year could mean the difference b/w hundreds of thousands of dollars both in saving money and making.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
Retake. UCLA is a non-starter and you can do much better than Emory, especially if "East Coast" means the Northeast.
-
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
You would be crazy (i mean that in the real sense of the word) to go to UCLA. If you want to be in the Northeast, go to school up there.
You aren't getting to the Northeast from either of those schools. Use the UCLA scholarship to leverage money from another school.
You aren't getting to the Northeast from either of those schools. Use the UCLA scholarship to leverage money from another school.
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
How long did you study? How rigorously?WhatShouldIDo2 wrote:@Man: I already delayed too much. I just can't anymore ...
Unless you really can't eke out a higher score, you're wasting an amazing GPA. Half-ride to UCLA is great, but you could be going to a much better school with much more money.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:26 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
I'm an in-house attorney that went to Emory.
UCLA for west coast.
Emory for east coast.
Emory doesnt place that well in big law.
If I wanted to maximize chance of big law between those two options I would choose UCLA, but knowing full well I'll end up out west.
Honestly, unless your gf has some sort of amazing job go to UCLA and make her follow. Most relationships in law school do not last anyway, go where you will be hired.
UCLA for west coast.
Emory for east coast.
Emory doesnt place that well in big law.
If I wanted to maximize chance of big law between those two options I would choose UCLA, but knowing full well I'll end up out west.
Honestly, unless your gf has some sort of amazing job go to UCLA and make her follow. Most relationships in law school do not last anyway, go where you will be hired.
-
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 pm
Re: UCLA vs. Emory
I wouldn't spend three years at a Cali law school if I wanted to be on the east coast. The real answer is to retake.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login