Top Law Schools

Do we have one of these threads started for this year yet?

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=191337

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=190807

I don't think so.

Who is up for the task?

Reg?

oh god it's going to be a massacre

sinfiery wrote:oh god it's going to be a massacre

Yeah it'll be really interesting to see how TTs and TTTs fare in medians.

sinfiery wrote:oh god it's going to be a massacre

are the final numbers even out yet for most schools?

dstars823 wrote:are the final numbers even out yet for most schools?

Most schools release numbers during or after orientation

Poor Stanford's still pulling multiple people off the waitlist.

It's going to be bad, guys.

twentypercentmore wrote:Poor Stanford's still pulling multiple people off the waitlist.

It's going to be bad, guys.

Isn't that good for those of us applying this cycle?

t-14orbust wrote:

twentypercentmore wrote:Poor Stanford's still pulling multiple people off the waitlist.

It's going to be bad, guys.

Isn't that good for those of us applying this cycle?

Yes. But it'll be bad for schools making the Sophie's choice between revenue and staying afloat in USNWR. Ultimately a great thing for the industry as schools start to close.

I read something that schools that had their numbers out at this time last year still don't have this year's numbers out. A lot of people think that it's because numbers are so much worse. I can't wait for some schools to shut down.

I dont think theres time, but a something like North's USNWR contest would have been fun

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=204782

Let me rephrase. When I say, "it's going to be bad";

twentypercentmore wrote:Poor Stanford's still pulling multiple people off the waitlist.

It's going to be bad, guys.

I mean, they are pulling mostly 3.8+/175+. Not exactly a medians hit

should be quite an interesting release.... and hopefully telling about the upcoming cycle!

jbagelboy wrote:

twentypercentmore wrote:Poor Stanford's still pulling multiple people off the waitlist.

It's going to be bad, guys.

I mean, they are pulling mostly 3.8+/175+. Not exactly a medians hit

Maybe not, but there's kind of a different theme this year. Two cycles ago, Stanford at sticker was always matched against, like, NYU with a half scholarship, and Stanford could afford to not take people off the waitlist in August because they knew they had their class locked in by July. Now they have to play Russian Roulette with their yields, hoping that the person they offer a spot to will take Stanford over, say, Penn on a full ride.

Maybe it's that LST's numbers are quite a bit better than last year's, but ultimately Stanford's gotten a lot more concerned with numbers this cycle than last.

twentypercentmore wrote:

jbagelboy wrote:

twentypercentmore wrote:Poor Stanford's still pulling multiple people off the waitlist.

It's going to be bad, guys.

I mean, they are pulling mostly 3.8+/175+. Not exactly a medians hit

Maybe not, but there's kind of a different theme this year. Two cycles ago, Stanford at sticker was always matched against, like, NYU with a half scholarship, and Stanford could afford to not take people off the waitlist in August because they knew they had their class locked in by July. Now they have to play Russian Roulette with their yields, hoping that the person they offer a spot to will take Stanford over, say, Penn on a full ride.

Maybe it's that LST's numbers are quite a bit better than last year's, but ultimately Stanford's gotten a lot more concerned with numbers this cycle than last.

I'm hoping this trend continues lol

Nova wrote:I dont think theres time, but a something like North's USNWR contest would have been fun

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=204782

I agree. It shouldn't be too late to put something together.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=215104

Someone started the median tracking thread. The format looks good.

ImNoScar wrote:

Nova wrote:I dont think theres time, but a something like North's USNWR contest would have been fun

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=204782

I agree. It shouldn't be too late to put something together.

Ill throw somthin together.

Duke posted.

c/o 2015 -> c/o 2016

3.58/3.76/3.85 -> 3.59/3.77/3.84
166/169/170 -> 165/169/170

Applications up from 4,963 to 5,014. Class size up from 209 to 211.

EVERYONE PLAY

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=215106

lol 0Ls

Berkeley.

3.68/3.81/3.91 -> 3.66/3.78/3.89
163/167/170 -> 166/167/169

Applications down from 7,027 to 5,944. Class size up from 263 to 286.

bouleversement wrote:Berkeley.

3.68/3.81/3.91 -> 3.66/3.78/3.89
163/167/170 -> 166/167/169

Applications down from 7,027 to 5,944. Class size up from 263 to 286.

Is that a joke?? They were saying on their twitter that apps went up. That has to be a mistake.