yea, I was excluding last year because they notably underenrolled.Tiago Splitter wrote:Columbia had like 90 fewer students start this past year, but I think the usual disparity has been more like 25-50.
predictions for this year TS?
yea, I was excluding last year because they notably underenrolled.Tiago Splitter wrote:Columbia had like 90 fewer students start this past year, but I think the usual disparity has been more like 25-50.
Pretty sure they are trying to keep it around the 368 we had this year.jbagelboy wrote:yea, I was excluding last year because they notably underenrolled.Tiago Splitter wrote:Columbia had like 90 fewer students start this past year, but I think the usual disparity has been more like 25-50.
predictions for this year TS?
Excellent. I hope so. Smaller sections I presumeTiago Splitter wrote:Pretty sure they are trying to keep it around the 368 we had this year.jbagelboy wrote:yea, I was excluding last year because they notably underenrolled.Tiago Splitter wrote:Columbia had like 90 fewer students start this past year, but I think the usual disparity has been more like 25-50.
predictions for this year TS?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Not factoring in AIII clerkships in those numbers makes them really suspect. LST is just fine.Informative wrote:Studies have been done already covering Biglaw placement by the top law schools.
http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL ... ctive=true
As a corollary to Noodley's on point statement, TLS is well aware of NLJ data; we are also aware that placement numbers and placement power for a school are not the same. The fact that Yale ranks below Penn, Columbia and Georgetown on NLJ does not point to YLS being a worse school for getting a high paying job.NoodleyOne wrote:Not factoring in AIII clerkships in those numbers makes them really suspect. LST is just fine.Informative wrote:Studies have been done already covering Biglaw placement by the top law schools.
http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL ... ctive=true