Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston Forum
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to decide between Michigan and BU/BC with about equal $$. I know that normally the obvious answer is Michigan, but I really want to end up in Boston after graduation. I have strong ties (as in I grew up/went to college/have lived in the Boston area my whole life), but NALP indicates that many of Boston's top firms don't even recruit at Michigan, and, according to their site, only six or eight Michigan graduates ended up in Boston last year. It's also worth noting that BU and BC are about $7k cheaper per year, so they would presumably end up being about $21k cheaper in the end, even with equal scholarships.
So, is Michigan still the obvious choice here?
I'm trying to decide between Michigan and BU/BC with about equal $$. I know that normally the obvious answer is Michigan, but I really want to end up in Boston after graduation. I have strong ties (as in I grew up/went to college/have lived in the Boston area my whole life), but NALP indicates that many of Boston's top firms don't even recruit at Michigan, and, according to their site, only six or eight Michigan graduates ended up in Boston last year. It's also worth noting that BU and BC are about $7k cheaper per year, so they would presumably end up being about $21k cheaper in the end, even with equal scholarships.
So, is Michigan still the obvious choice here?
- Grazzhoppa
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:00 am
- somewhatwayward
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Why can't you take the Michigan $ back to BU/BC and ask for more? If you could basically get a full ride to one of those and you don't mind forfeiting the greater chance of big law from Michigan (not as much greater as it should be /Michigan dig), then BU/BC would be good. What are your aspirations?
Also, it is hard to advise without the actual numbers. If they all cost like $150K, they are all too expensive, and you should retake/reapply. If it is like they all cost $120K, that seems to be objectively too much to spend for BU/BC and right on the edge to spend for Michigan. If it is like they all cost $75K, that'd be all right for BU/BC although passing up Michigan for $75K is painful for everyone else to watch.
Also, it is hard to advise without the actual numbers. If they all cost like $150K, they are all too expensive, and you should retake/reapply. If it is like they all cost $120K, that seems to be objectively too much to spend for BU/BC and right on the edge to spend for Michigan. If it is like they all cost $75K, that'd be all right for BU/BC although passing up Michigan for $75K is painful for everyone else to watch.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
From a BU grad, take Mich. If it was BU/BC $$ v. full fare at Mich, I'd take the former - but at equal $, Mich is the clear winner.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
How much are the scholarships?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Michigan is offering $17.5k per year, BU/BC offering $20k per year. Working on the negotiation process. Considering my numbers are normally borderline for BU/BC but got me money at Michigan, I'm curious to see how they respond.
I'm a big fan of Michigan, but I'm just worried about their ability to place in Boston. Numbers are reverse splitter-y (3.9x, low 160s, non URM). Hoping to work for a firm upon graduation, but I'm not biglaw or bust.
I'm a big fan of Michigan, but I'm just worried about their ability to place in Boston. Numbers are reverse splitter-y (3.9x, low 160s, non URM). Hoping to work for a firm upon graduation, but I'm not biglaw or bust.
- Samara
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Boston is hard to get from Midwestern schools. Since you prefer Boston non-biglaw to biglaw elsewhere, I would take the Boston schools.
- bruinfan10
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Sigh...you realize Dean Z is a lot more transparent about the school's numbers than a lot of the other T14s, right? And that UM doesn't self-employ jobless grads to juke the stats UVA-style? And that apparently Mich kicks the shit out of Columbia, Cornell, and Northwestern in clerkship placement (LinkRemoved)? Michigan's numbers could be better, but the TLS echo-chamber hate is a little overblown.somewhatwayward wrote:Why can't you take the Michigan $ back to BU/BC and ask for more? If you could basically get a full ride to one of those and you don't mind forfeiting the greater chance of big law from Michigan (not as much greater as it should be /Michigan dig), then BU/BC would be good.
The relevant question is what percentage of the class these Boston regionals place into Boston biglaw. If that number isn't really high, you're a lot safer going to Michigan given your debt level. If your class rank isn't killer, you've got much better access to the (comparatively larger and more forgiving) NYC legal market. I'm also not sure what percentage of Michigan's student body has ties to Boston in any given year, so that may skew its Boston placement stats to some extent. Definitely worth checking out.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Thanks for the input everyone.
-
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:20 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
The fact that you have lifelong ties makes this an easy call for Michigan. With a market like Boston, the number of people who end up in the city isn't an indicator of "ability to place." Even if firms don't recruit at your school, it's easy to just send in your resume and come into town to interview.
A number of students at Boston firms come from random schools all over the place (Tulane, UNC, Berkeley, UCLA, etc.) and it has nothing to do with the school's "placement power."
A number of students at Boston firms come from random schools all over the place (Tulane, UNC, Berkeley, UCLA, etc.) and it has nothing to do with the school's "placement power."
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
To answer your question: Michigan.
To address the real issue here: retake.
Harvard is within reach given that GPA. Time to get an LSAT worthy of that GPA.
To address the real issue here: retake.
Harvard is within reach given that GPA. Time to get an LSAT worthy of that GPA.
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Michigan wins this one by a landslide.
- somewhatwayward
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
The "/Michigan dig" was intended to signal to not take it t Po o seriously but since you did....notice that I specifically said big law placement not general placement. It is an objective fact that Michigan' big law has been pretty poor for the past few years. I think they have been second worst in the T14 for the past few years.... if not that definitely not in line with the T10. Michigan is still a great (although like most schools not worth sticker) but that doesn't change is mediocre big law stats.bruinfan10 wrote:Sigh...you realize Dean Z is a lot more transparent about the school's numbers than a lot of the other T14s, right? And that UM doesn't self-employ jobless grads to juke the stats UVA-style? And that apparently Mich kicks the shit out of Columbia, Cornell, and Northwestern in clerkship placement (LinkRemoved)? Michigan's numbers could be better, but the TLS echo-chamber hate is a little overblown.somewhatwayward wrote:Why can't you take the Michigan $ back to BU/BC and ask for more? If you could basically get a full ride to one of those and you don't mind forfeiting the greater chance of big law from Michigan (not as much greater as it should be /Michigan dig), then BU/BC would be good.
Protip: defensiveness usually indicates a kernel of truth.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Off topic, but I love your avatar.somewhatwayward wrote:The "/Michigan dig" was intended to signal to not take it t Po o seriously but since you did....notice that I specifically said big law placement not general placement. It is an objective fact that Michigan' big law has been pretty poor for the past few years. I think they have been second worst in the T14 for the past few years.... if not that definitely not in line with the T10. Michigan is still a great (although like most schools not worth sticker) but that doesn't change is mediocre big law stats.bruinfan10 wrote:Sigh...you realize Dean Z is a lot more transparent about the school's numbers than a lot of the other T14s, right? And that UM doesn't self-employ jobless grads to juke the stats UVA-style? And that apparently Mich kicks the shit out of Columbia, Cornell, and Northwestern in clerkship placement (LinkRemoved)? Michigan's numbers could be better, but the TLS echo-chamber hate is a little overblown.somewhatwayward wrote:Why can't you take the Michigan $ back to BU/BC and ask for more? If you could basically get a full ride to one of those and you don't mind forfeiting the greater chance of big law from Michigan (not as much greater as it should be /Michigan dig), then BU/BC would be good.
Protip: defensiveness usually indicates a kernel of truth.
- Redamon1
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:46 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Just because a firm doesn't attend Mich's OCI doesn't mean they won't recruit you. You can go back to Boston over Thanksgiving, Winter Break, Spring Break, weekends, summer and hustle to get interviews at Boston-based firm. Do it.ohpobrecito wrote: NALP indicates that many of Boston's top firms don't even recruit at Michigan
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Well, everyone's optimism about Michigan --> Boston makes me feel a bit better.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
BigZuck wrote:retake
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:57 pm
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
BigZuck wrote:BigZuck wrote:retake
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
I love that you quoted yourself.BigZuck wrote:BigZuck wrote:retake
- Kalinda
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Michigan ($$) or BU/BC ($$) for Boston
Redamon1 wrote:Just because a firm doesn't attend Mich's OCI doesn't mean they won't recruit you. You can go back to Boston over Thanksgiving, Winter Break, Spring Break, weekends, summer and hustle to get interviews at Boston-based firm. Do it.ohpobrecito wrote: NALP indicates that many of Boston's top firms don't even recruit at Michigan
I know the Boston market is all about supporting their own, but I would pick Michigan. You have ties to Boston. This is anecdotal, but I have several friends who went to law schools outside New England and were able to get back to Boston because they either went to high school there, college, or did a little post grad work (all of these schools were atleast T20).
Michigan!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login