Duke, Columbia, NYU, NU (sticker) v. UT (45k) v. BC/BU (90k)
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:14 am
Edited.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=207044
framboozer wrote:I am perplexed that you got into Columbia, but didn't get $$$ in the T-14. Are you still waiting to hear back from anywhere?
Can you share your numbers and type of URM? Very weird results from a cycle.walkingpanda wrote:framboozer wrote:I am perplexed that you got into Columbia, but didn't get $$$ in the T-14. Are you still waiting to hear back from anywhere?
Waitlisted at Penn. That's pretty much it.
I've had a strange cycle. Waitlisted at UofM (withdrew), rejected at Cornell, for example.
I was waitlisted in Columbia last cycle. Raised my LSAT a few points and got in.
Redfactor wrote:walkingpanda wrote:framboozer wrote:I am perplexed that you got into Columbia, but didn't get $$$ in the T-14. Are you still waiting to hear back from anywhere?
A minority (AA from a more recent post) with a Columbia admission shouldn't go to law school? There has to be an astronomically small chance that he wouldn't receive at least one market paying offer.BigZuck wrote:I think this might be one of those "don't go to law school" situations. None of those sound very promising to me.
he's looking at 300k in debt...you know how many years of biglaw its gonna take to pay that off? probably wont last long enough.TheColonel wrote:A minority (AA from a more recent post) with a Columbia admission shouldn't go to law school? There has to be an astronomically small chance that he wouldn't receive at least one market paying offer.BigZuck wrote:I think this might be one of those "don't go to law school" situations. None of those sound very promising to me.
300K+ debt in NYC even with a big law salary sounds awful to me. Personally I wouldn't do it.TheColonel wrote:A minority (AA from a more recent post) with a Columbia admission shouldn't go to law school? There has to be an astronomically small chance that he wouldn't receive at least one market paying offer.BigZuck wrote:I think this might be one of those "don't go to law school" situations. None of those sound very promising to me.
StylinNProfilin wrote:he's looking at 300k in debt...you know how many years of biglaw its gonna take to pay that off? probably wont last long enough.TheColonel wrote:A minority (AA from a more recent post) with a Columbia admission shouldn't go to law school? There has to be an astronomically small chance that he wouldn't receive at least one market paying offer.BigZuck wrote:I think this might be one of those "don't go to law school" situations. None of those sound very promising to me.
Fair enough, but that's an argument against attending any law school at sticker.StylinNProfilin wrote:he's looking at 300k in debt...you know how many years of biglaw its gonna take to pay that off? probably wont last long enough.TheColonel wrote:A minority (AA from a more recent post) with a Columbia admission shouldn't go to law school? There has to be an astronomically small chance that he wouldn't receive at least one market paying offer.BigZuck wrote:I think this might be one of those "don't go to law school" situations. None of those sound very promising to me.
I don't really know where you're getting that, butBigZuck wrote:The OP doesn't sound particularly responsible or good with money, I think law school is not a good choice even though he/she got into some amazing ones.
seems like a real problem to me. With this debt load, you are committing the next 5-10 years of your life to this profession. Be real with yourself about that.walkingpanda wrote:That's my biggest concern. I get bored, really quickly. I've had like 10 jobs and in 7 years. My motto is MOVE ON. It visibly shows when I am bored.
Dude... Do this.walkingpanda wrote:StylinNProfilin wrote:he's looking at 300k in debt...you know how many years of biglaw its gonna take to pay that off? probably wont last long enough.TheColonel wrote:A minority (AA from a more recent post) with a Columbia admission shouldn't go to law school? There has to be an astronomically small chance that he wouldn't receive at least one market paying offer.BigZuck wrote:I think this might be one of those "don't go to law school" situations. None of those sound very promising to me.
That's my biggest concern. I get bored, really quickly. I've had like 10 jobs and in 7 years. My motto is MOVE ON. It visibly shows when I am bored.
On other hand, I entirely believe I can raise my LSAT to 170+. But what are the chances of getting a fully scholly from a t-14 with ~3 and 170+ for AA male?
I can't say much on scholarship offers, but I assume you'd get some great offers. Regardless, are you sure law is for you? I'm just a 0L, but it doesn't seem like law is the kind of job that lends itself towards changing jobs every year or more.walkingpanda wrote:StylinNProfilin wrote:he's looking at 300k in debt...you know how many years of biglaw its gonna take to pay that off? probably wont last long enough.TheColonel wrote:A minority (AA from a more recent post) with a Columbia admission shouldn't go to law school? There has to be an astronomically small chance that he wouldn't receive at least one market paying offer.BigZuck wrote:I think this might be one of those "don't go to law school" situations. None of those sound very promising to me.
That's my biggest concern. I get bored, really quickly. I've had like 10 jobs and in 7 years. My motto is MOVE ON. It visibly shows when I am bored.
On other hand, I entirely believe I can raise my LSAT to 170+. But what are the chances of getting a fully scholly from a t-14 with ~3 and 170+ for AA male?
Yeah, but he should have scholarships to some of these places already. Weird cycle.sinfiery wrote: Dude... Do this.
I'm not positive of full rides are in order because of your gpa but a 170+ AA male is like the holy grail of URM applicants.
RhymesLikeDimes wrote:For the right person, Columbia at sticker is a good choice. But your situation sounds like anything but a full-ride is going to be risky. And, no offense meant, but 3.3/164 students are the types we read horror stories about graduating from a T6 and doing doc-review. If you are going to pay sticker (and HYSC are the only places I would), your heart better be completely in it.
They have reduced the classes but I don't think it's by as much as you're saying. Are you comparing a graduating class vs an entering class? They always pick up a bunch of transfers. This has an entering class drop of ~10% http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=columbia.02889 wrote:I didn't realize how dramatically Columbia had cut its class size over the last two years until now! 469 to 365?
Unless I read it wrong, the ABA employment report for Columbia's class of 2012 listed 469 graduates.TheColonel wrote:They have reduced the classes but I don't think it's by as much as you're saying. Are you comparing a graduating class vs an entering class? They always pick up a bunch of transfers. This has an entering class drop of ~10% http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=columbia.02889 wrote:I didn't realize how dramatically Columbia had cut its class size over the last two years until now! 469 to 365?
Politics and international NGOs do not require a law degree. You should only go to law school if you want to practice law. If your interest is international/politics, you should get a Master's in Public Policy or International Affairs. It will be much cheaper and will serve you better in the field.walkingpanda wrote:RhymesLikeDimes wrote:For the right person, Columbia at sticker is a good choice. But your situation sounds like anything but a full-ride is going to be risky. And, no offense meant, but 3.3/164 students are the types we read horror stories about graduating from a T6 and doing doc-review. If you are going to pay sticker (and HYSC are the only places I would), your heart better be completely in it.
No offense taken. This is also why I am skeptical. I've never been one to punch clocks. However, I am truly interested in the law, its history, and its application. I am also aware that my career goals (politics>international NGOs>Judge) require a law degree.
A lot of people get JDs before joining the foreign service, which puts you on a new project/in a new country like every 2-3 years. That's something to consider, OP, especially considering that LRAP would then cover it.lmsf wrote:Politics and international NGOs do not require a law degree. You should only go to law school if you want to practice law. If your interest is international/politics, you should get a Master's in Public Policy or International Affairs. It will be much cheaper and will serve you better in the field.walkingpanda wrote:RhymesLikeDimes wrote:For the right person, Columbia at sticker is a good choice. But your situation sounds like anything but a full-ride is going to be risky. And, no offense meant, but 3.3/164 students are the types we read horror stories about graduating from a T6 and doing doc-review. If you are going to pay sticker (and HYSC are the only places I would), your heart better be completely in it.
No offense taken. This is also why I am skeptical. I've never been one to punch clocks. However, I am truly interested in the law, its history, and its application. I am also aware that my career goals (politics>international NGOs>Judge) require a law degree.
If you are interested in domestic politics and you are easily bored, you should consider working on political campaigns. Each job is only during the campaign season (and if you're doing a presidential campaign you're often jumping from state primary to state primary so your job changes even more) and you'll have a lot of constant change and be able to work on many types of campaigns. You don't need an advanced degree for this type of work (or even a BA really), all that matters is how good you are and your connections. Of course, this type of work required 80+ hours a week and pays like shit in the beginning (consulting and fundraising is where the big $'s at, and you need experience for that), so up to you.