Top Law Schools

.

retake

your post unfortunately is riddled w errors. allow me to disabuse. you will not get into Boalt or SLS. further davis/hastings are bona fide shitmills unless you are going for free. the CA economy is tough. retake for happier outcomes otherwise shitlaw LOOMS.

Retake or get a huge scholly somewhere.

You probably already know this but just in case, check out http://www.lawschooltransparency.com

best of luck

Your softs are average. Good softs would be something that no one you've ever met has.

stillwater wrote:your post unfortunately is riddled w errors. allow me to disabuse. you will not get into Boalt or SLS. further davis/hastings are bona fide shitmills unless you are going for free. the CA economy is tough. retake for happier outcomes otherwise shitlaw LOOMS.

Harsh post, but probably true. You either need to retake in order to get a score high for Boalt/SLS or at least a T14, or a score high enough for a big scholarship to Hastings/Davis or perhaps UCLA or USC.

.

People on this site love to be dicks. Your softs are above average for law school, but probably not for Berkeley. Your numbers are on the cusp, and in this environment you may be a good "sticker" candidate for Berkeley. If you are comfy with that, congrats.

Depending on your goals, maybe a full-ride or close to it at Hastings might be worth it. SCU is so bad right now that you shouldn't go there regardless of any factors. Like 1/3 people from SCU are becoming anywhere close to actual lawyers, many of those with science backgrounds.

Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:People on this site love to be dicks. Your softs are above average for law school, but probably not for Berkeley. Your numbers are on the cusp, and in this environment you may be a good "sticker" candidate for Berkeley. If you are comfy with that, congrats.

Depending on your goals, maybe a full-ride or close to it at Hastings might be worth it. SCU is so bad right now that you shouldn't go there regardless of any factors. Like 1/3 people from SCU are becoming anywhere close to actual lawyers, many of those with science backgrounds.

I wouldn't pay out of state sticker for Boalt.

rad lulz wrote:

Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:People on this site love to be dicks. Your softs are above average for law school, but probably not for Berkeley. Your numbers are on the cusp, and in this environment you may be a good "sticker" candidate for Berkeley. If you are comfy with that, congrats.

Depending on your goals, maybe a full-ride or close to it at Hastings might be worth it. SCU is so bad right now that you shouldn't go there regardless of any factors. Like 1/3 people from SCU are becoming anywhere close to actual lawyers, many of those with science backgrounds.

I wouldn't pay out of state sticker for Boalt.

Ditto.

While D1 varsity athlete is good as far as softs go, I don't think OP is getting Boalt anyways with a 3.7/166. She's got a shot, but an outside shot.

rad lulz wrote:I wouldn't pay out of state sticker for Boalt.

$50k okay, but $54k no-go?

romothesavior wrote:

rad lulz wrote:

Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:People on this site love to be dicks. Your softs are above average for law school, but probably not for Berkeley. Your numbers are on the cusp, and in this environment you may be a good "sticker" candidate for Berkeley. If you are comfy with that, congrats.

Depending on your goals, maybe a full-ride or close to it at Hastings might be worth it. SCU is so bad right now that you shouldn't go there regardless of any factors. Like 1/3 people from SCU are becoming anywhere close to actual lawyers, many of those with science backgrounds.

I wouldn't pay out of state sticker for Boalt.

Ditto.

While D1 varsity athlete is good as far as softs go, I don't think OP is getting Boalt anyways with a 3.7/166. She's got a shot, but an outside shot.

Albeit my gpa is substantially lower, that soft actually worked against me during an interview with an unnamed school. The person brought up the subject about my low gpa and told me "Looks like you should have spent more time studying then benchwarming".

I never competed in a sport that even had benches.

bluepenguin wrote:

rad lulz wrote:I wouldn't pay out of state sticker for Boalt.

$50k okay, but $54k no-go?

I wouldn't pay in state sticker for Boalt unless CoL was free.

Also that $12k lol

Get a job in tech sales- forget law school. Make 75k-125k a year and be done with it.

Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:People on this site love to be dicks. Your softs are above average for law school, but probably not for Berkeley. Your numbers are on the cusp, and in this environment you may be a good "sticker" candidate for Berkeley. If you are comfy with that, congrats.

Depending on your goals, maybe a full-ride or close to it at Hastings might be worth it. SCU is so bad right now that you shouldn't go there regardless of any factors. Like 1/3 people from SCU are becoming anywhere close to actual lawyers, many of those with science backgrounds.

Seems right to me. I'd say start studying for June retake and see how this cycle plays out. You can decide in April-May what to do based on acceptances, money, PT scores.

.

sixseat wrote: Many of the attorneys I work for think that if I don't get into Boalt I should just go to Hastings on a scholarship and aim for top 5-10%,

This should tell you all you need to know. If you have to aim for the top 10% to feel comfortable about getting a halfway decent job, there is no reason to go.