Page 1 of 1

Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:06 am
by Circlewave
From PA originally, DC undergrad.

I'm still waiting on a few schools, but these three are my top choices right now. I'd like DC, but would also like VA or NC. I haven't negotiated yet, but assuming the worst, which would likely be the best option if I wanted to clerk or work for somewhere like the DOJ?

*I will have some assistance with COL, so my loans will be almost entirely tuition.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:16 am
by timbs4339
Circlewave wrote:From PA originally, DC undergrad.

I'm still waiting on a few schools, but these three are my top choices right now. I'd like DC, but would also like VA or NC. I haven't negotiated yet, but assuming the worst, which would likely be the best option if I wanted to clerk or work for somewhere like the DOJ?

*I will have some assistance with COL, so my loans will be almost entirely tuition.
Clerk or work for the DOJ?

Image

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:49 pm
by UAX09
I attended undergrad at a DC school. W&M is well known and respected in the greater DC region. I would choose W&M despite W&L's higher ranking.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:59 pm
by ndirish2010
W&L has the best clerkship placement of the three, but TCR is retake.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:04 pm
by nebula666
timbs4339 wrote:
Circlewave wrote:From PA originally, DC undergrad.

I'm still waiting on a few schools, but these three are my top choices right now. I'd like DC, but would also like VA or NC. I haven't negotiated yet, but assuming the worst, which would likely be the best option if I wanted to clerk or work for somewhere like the DOJ?

*I will have some assistance with COL, so my loans will be almost entirely tuition.
Clerk or work for the DOJ?
WL and WM both place more overall into clerkships than Duke, Michigan, Virginia, Vandy, Berkeley, Chicago, Penn, Columbia, NU, Cornell, etc. They are #16 and #18, respectively for Federal clerkships.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:26 pm
by Crowing
nebula666 wrote:
timbs4339 wrote:
Circlewave wrote:From PA originally, DC undergrad.

I'm still waiting on a few schools, but these three are my top choices right now. I'd like DC, but would also like VA or NC. I haven't negotiated yet, but assuming the worst, which would likely be the best option if I wanted to clerk or work for somewhere like the DOJ?

*I will have some assistance with COL, so my loans will be almost entirely tuition.
Clerk or work for the DOJ?
WL and WM both place more overall into clerkships than Duke, Michigan, Virginia, Vandy, Berkeley, Chicago, Penn, Columbia, NU, Cornell, etc. They are #16 and #18, respectively for Federal clerkships.
not as a percentage of the class

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:42 pm
by timbs4339
nebula666 wrote:
timbs4339 wrote:
Circlewave wrote:From PA originally, DC undergrad.

I'm still waiting on a few schools, but these three are my top choices right now. I'd like DC, but would also like VA or NC. I haven't negotiated yet, but assuming the worst, which would likely be the best option if I wanted to clerk or work for somewhere like the DOJ?

*I will have some assistance with COL, so my loans will be almost entirely tuition.
Clerk or work for the DOJ?
WL and WM both place more overall into clerkships than Duke, Michigan, Virginia, Vandy, Berkeley, Chicago, Penn, Columbia, NU, Cornell, etc. They are #16 and #18, respectively for Federal clerkships.
nebula666 dum dum dum dum dum

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:57 pm
by ndirish2010
Crowing wrote:
nebula666 wrote:
timbs4339 wrote:
Circlewave wrote:From PA originally, DC undergrad.

I'm still waiting on a few schools, but these three are my top choices right now. I'd like DC, but would also like VA or NC. I haven't negotiated yet, but assuming the worst, which would likely be the best option if I wanted to clerk or work for somewhere like the DOJ?

*I will have some assistance with COL, so my loans will be almost entirely tuition.
Clerk or work for the DOJ?
WL and WM both place more overall into clerkships than Duke, Michigan, Virginia, Vandy, Berkeley, Chicago, Penn, Columbia, NU, Cornell, etc. They are #16 and #18, respectively for Federal clerkships.
not as a percentage of the class
Ummm, what? You realize W&L is one of the smallest Tier 1 schools right? They place about 8% into federal clerkships, which is better than a few T14s, as mentioned above.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:06 pm
by Crowing
dunno what to say other than "you're wrong." the only correctly referenced school in that post is gulc.

cornell 8%
duke 11.1%
chicago 9.4%
michigan 10.6%
northwestern 8%
columbia 8.1%
berkeley 9.7%
virginia 10.6%
nyu 10.9%
penn 9.1%
vandy 10.1%

w&l 7.8%

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:11 pm
by timbs4339
Can any W+L or W+M students comment on the clerkship rate? I noticed their state:federal ratio is more than 1:1, which is not common for schools placing more than 5% into fed clerkships. Either the VA supreme court is 50/50 W+L and W+M grads, some of these federal clerkships are admin clerks or unpaid, or they have some faculty members with huge pull.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:55 pm
by FamilyLawEsq
Wake has the Metropolitan Exchange Program in DC for a semester, not sure if the other schools do.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:10 pm
by IrwinM.Fletcher
Your job prospects are basically the same from any of these schools. Wake is the lowest ranked but placed the highest % at NALP firms among your three options. The difference, however, between a school that places 11% in biglaw vs one that places 14% in biglaw is pretty non-existent.

Follow the money.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:23 am
by nebula666
Crowing wrote:dunno what to say other than "you're wrong." the only correctly referenced school in that post is gulc.

cornell 8%
duke 11.1%
chicago 9.4%
michigan 10.6%
northwestern 8%
columbia 8.1%
berkeley 9.7%
virginia 10.6%
nyu 10.9%
penn 9.1%
vandy 10.1%

w&l 7.8%
I said more overall but I meant % of the class, which is still true. Yes, I understand that federal clerkships are much more prestigious, but if OP just wants any clerkship, see above. I know that schools like Rutgers, UNLV and Seton Hall place a lot more into state/local than WL, but when you combine state/local + federal clerkships, WL is not a bad choice.

Also, WL is less than 1% less than a few of those schools. It's comparable to almost all of the T14 for federal clerkships except HYS.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:08 am
by timbs4339
nebula666 wrote:
Crowing wrote:dunno what to say other than "you're wrong." the only correctly referenced school in that post is gulc.

cornell 8%
duke 11.1%
chicago 9.4%
michigan 10.6%
northwestern 8%
columbia 8.1%
berkeley 9.7%
virginia 10.6%
nyu 10.9%
penn 9.1%
vandy 10.1%

w&l 7.8%
I said more overall but I meant % of the class, which is still true. Yes, I understand that federal clerkships are much more prestigious, but if OP just wants any clerkship, see above. I know that schools like Rutgers, UNLV and Seton Hall place a lot more into state/local than WL, but when you combine state/local + federal clerkships, WL is not a bad choice.

Also, WL is less than 1% less than a few of those schools. It's comparable to almost all of the T14 for federal clerkships except HYS.
It may be comparable percentage wise, but are those clerkships AIII? Are they federal district magistrates? Or are they with Social Security Administration judges? Or are they unpaid or school-funded? T14 schools generally place most of their clerks into AIII clerkships, not state clerkships. I'm not sure why these schools would have a special feed into the AIII clerkship market but can't place students into biglaw.

Also his mention of DOJ made me think he wanted federal AIII clerkships. DOJ is going to be near-impossible out of any of those schools.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:04 pm
by ndirish2010
Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:25 pm
by timbs4339
ndirish2010 wrote:Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.
Do you go to W+L?

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:51 pm
by Circlewave
timbs4339 wrote:
ndirish2010 wrote:Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.
Do you go to W+L?
dat username...

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:33 pm
by ndirish2010
timbs4339 wrote:
ndirish2010 wrote:Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.
Do you go to W+L?
LOL.

Loyal judges + small class size = good A3 percentage.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:59 pm
by timbs4339
Circlewave wrote:
timbs4339 wrote:
ndirish2010 wrote:Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.
Do you go to W+L?
dat username...
dat rhetorical question...
ndirish2010 wrote:
timbs4339 wrote:
ndirish2010 wrote:Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.
Do you go to W+L?
LOL.

Loyal judges + small class size = good A3 percentage.
I'd need more than claims of "loyal judges" to attend W+L in expectation that they are placing 8% in A3 clerkships. Why are their judges so loyal when their biglaw alumni are not?

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:23 pm
by ndirish2010
timbs4339 wrote:
Circlewave wrote:
timbs4339 wrote:
ndirish2010 wrote:Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.
Do you go to W+L?
dat username...
dat rhetorical question...
ndirish2010 wrote:
timbs4339 wrote:
ndirish2010 wrote:Loyal judges. W&L alumni network is pretty solid. It is kind of the same reason ND has placed 6-8% in A3.
Do you go to W+L?
LOL.

Loyal judges + small class size = good A3 percentage.
I'd need more than claims of "loyal judges" to attend W+L in expectation that they are placing 8% in A3 clerkships. Why are their judges so loyal when their biglaw alumni are not?
Judges make hiring decisions on their own. Firms don't operate this way. Small class size hurts W&L's power in big firms (to the extent they have a presence at all).

Note that I'm not saying that OP should go to W&L, just giving an explanation for their solid A3 percentage.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:46 pm
by timbs4339
ndirish2010 wrote:
Judges make hiring decisions on their own. Firms don't operate this way. Small class size hurts W&L's power in big firms (to the extent they have a presence at all).

Note that I'm not saying that OP should go to W&L, just giving an explanation for their solid A3 percentage.
But small class size means they need to place fewer students. And if W+L has AIII judges as alumni they should certainly have enough powerful biglaw partners to give them more than a 12.4% large firm score.

I'm just not sure how you can measure "loyal alumni" since every school claims to have them. If a school has loyal alumni it should be outplacing in all categories.

It's more likely a lot of these federal clerkships are non-AIII, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong by someone with real data.

Re: Wake/W&M/W&L

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:04 pm
by Cellar-door
timbs4339 wrote:
ndirish2010 wrote:
Judges make hiring decisions on their own. Firms don't operate this way. Small class size hurts W&L's power in big firms (to the extent they have a presence at all).

Note that I'm not saying that OP should go to W&L, just giving an explanation for their solid A3 percentage.
But small class size means they need to place fewer students. And if W+L has AIII judges as alumni they should certainly have enough powerful biglaw partners to give them more than a 12.4% large firm score.

I'm just not sure how you can measure "loyal alumni" since every school claims to have them. If a school has loyal alumni it should be outplacing in all categories.

It's more likely a lot of these federal clerkships are non-AIII, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong by someone with real data.
USNWR has W&L with these numbers for Article III judges: 9% for class of 2007, 7% in 2009 which are the only two I could find data on.