.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:53 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=202743
Mr. Frodo wrote:VERY COOL. I like you.
Regulus wrote:Although this doesn't really serve any purpose other than being interesting to look at, I gathered all of the past U.S. News & World Report data for the T14 and created a table showing all of the rankings over the years. I also created a simple graph which shows the minimum and maximum rankings of each of these schools, as well as each school's average ranking over the years. The spreadsheet can be accessed here:
U.S. News & World Report Rankings: The Top 14
Regulus wrote:I just hope I don't end up like this guy... It seems like his one and only hobby is doing this kind of stuff... and I am slowly moving in that direction.Dmini7 wrote:I agree, I really enjoy all the compilation posts regulus has been making. They are all very informative and cool to see.Mr. Frodo wrote:VERY COOL. I like you.
This is great!! WOW. thank you. I predict Michigan makes a big comeback this year.twinkletoes16 wrote:Regulus wrote:Although this doesn't really serve any purpose other than being interesting to look at, I gathered all of the past U.S. News & World Report data for the T14 and created a table showing all of the rankings over the years. I also created a simple graph which shows the minimum and maximum rankings of each of these schools, as well as each school's average ranking over the years. The spreadsheet can be accessed here:
U.S. News & World Report Rankings: The Top 14
I was JUST wondering about this. Thank you!!!
ETA: michigan, what happened? also berk has been ALL over the board.
curious66 wrote: This is great!! WOW. thank you. I predict Michigan makes a big comeback this year.
They changed the formula between y1 and y2. Michigan didn't get worse all of a sudden.twinkletoes16 wrote:Regulus wrote:Although this doesn't really serve any purpose other than being interesting to look at, I gathered all of the past U.S. News & World Report data for the T14 and created a table showing all of the rankings over the years. I also created a simple graph which shows the minimum and maximum rankings of each of these schools, as well as each school's average ranking over the years. The spreadsheet can be accessed here:
U.S. News & World Report Rankings: The Top 14
I was JUST wondering about this. Thank you!!!
ETA: michigan, what happened? also berk has been ALL over the board.
This is what I've heard. If you look lots of schools change drastically -- Harvard goes from 2 to 5, Chicago from 6 to 2, etc. Michigan is just the most obvious since 1987 is its brief moment in the glory ofJamMasterJ wrote:They changed the formula between y1 and y2. Michigan didn't get worse all of a sudden.twinkletoes16 wrote:Regulus wrote:Although this doesn't really serve any purpose other than being interesting to look at, I gathered all of the past U.S. News & World Report data for the T14 and created a table showing all of the rankings over the years. I also created a simple graph which shows the minimum and maximum rankings of each of these schools, as well as each school's average ranking over the years. The spreadsheet can be accessed here:
U.S. News & World Report Rankings: The Top 14
I was JUST wondering about this. Thank you!!!
ETA: michigan, what happened? also berk has been ALL over the board.
Those jumps were from '87 to '90 . . . no idea what happened between '88-'89.Yukos wrote:-- Harvard goes from 2 to 5, Chicago from 6 to 2
As far as I can tell there were no rankings between 87 and 90.Skye wrote:Those jumps were from '87 to '90 . . . no idea what happened between '88-'89.Yukos wrote:-- Harvard goes from 2 to 5, Chicago from 6 to 2
Yeah, totally awesome dude!!!Mr. Frodo wrote:VERY COOL. I like you.
They just may not have intended the rankings to be annual from the start - USNWR ranks other grad programs, but it's not annual - more like every 5 years.Skye wrote:I find it puzzling that there were no ’88-’89 rankings, but it is possible, I suppose. Neither Google or Bing has a record on ’88-’89. Hmmmm….
That makes sense .... thanks.A. Nony Mouse wrote:They just may not have intended the rankings to be annual from the start - USNWR ranks other grad programs, but it's not annual - more like every 5 years.Skye wrote:I find it puzzling that there were no ’88-’89 rankings, but it is possible, I suppose. Neither Google or Bing has a record on ’88-’89. Hmmmm….
nebula666 wrote:Awesome work, thanks