- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
- Posts: 3440
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Yeah, I think this is right, plus the PhD suggests that you're a dabbler and might have your head in the clouds, or at least highly intellectual aspirations—not exactly the kind of person who can be relied on to grind out hours doing diligence.gobuffs10 wrote: To academics, the JD is puzzling, and to legal employers, the PhD is the same. My contracts professor put it pretty well: "Firms are going to look at your resume, see the PhD, and have absolutely no idea what to do with you." The extra time spent working on the PhD means you aren't practicing law, and a PhD is worthless to a law firm. It adds nothing, and the years you spend not working in law might actually hurt you. In addition, I really can't see the added value of a JD to any of these degrees (and by can't see, I mean it makes absolutely no sense to me).
The main exception is having a science PhD if you want to do IP law. But that's a whole other story entirely.
You might also come across some people with social science or humanities PhDs in law firms, but from what I've seen, they generally got the PhD first, then went back to get a JD as a career switch. They don't generally pursue both simultaneously—again, because it isn't really much of a coherent track to be on.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Already a member? Login
Clerkship, Spring The candidate will engage in cutting-edge constitutional litigation. Will have the opportun... read more
Clerkship, Fall The candidate will have opportunity to substantively contribute to active litigation, work cl... read more
Summer Internship The intern may be asked to do a variety of things, including day-to-day office work such as... read more