Page 1 of 1
T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:42 am
by SehMeSerrious
What T14 schools tend to favor reverse splitters? Which schools care least about the LSAT? Which schools focus more on GPA? Which schools are more holistic and give more consideration to softs, recs, PS, etc.?
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:54 am
by eaper
SehMeSerrious wrote:What T14 schools tend to favor reverse splitters? Which schools care least about the LSAT? Which schools focus more on GPA? Which schools are more holistic and give more consideration to softs, recs, PS, etc.?
Yale and Harvard are the only that really focus on softs (assuming you have the numbers to back them). I think Berkeley is known for focusing more on GPA as well.
Best advice to get into the T14 for a reverse splitter is going to be take the LSAT again, especially this late in the cycle. It also depends on your numbers. A 4.0/150 isn't going to get you any of them=\ Good luck.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:23 am
by IAFG
All the schools that take splitters take reverse splitters. They have to. The problem is, There are a gajillion reverse splitters for every splitter, so schools get to be pretty picky. Hint: you're probably not a special snowflake.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:54 am
by johansantana21
UVA ED is TCR
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:45 am
by 20130312
Retake and enjoy HYS is TCR.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:44 pm
by skers
Seh rants should be a solid soft as long as you pull it off in a 20 page PS.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:45 pm
by lovejopd
IAFG wrote:All the schools that take splitters take reverse splitters. They have to. The problem is, There are a gajillion reverse splitters for every splitter, so schools get to be pretty picky. Hint: you're probably not a special snowflake.
This

Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:52 pm
by JamMasterJ
Mich and Berk
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:55 pm
by auburnbelle89
I'm definitely a reverse splitter and got lucky with UVA. I've heard Michigan and Boult are kind to reverse splitters as well.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:25 am
by FavoriteColorGRUE
I'm a reverse splitter with good news from Northwestern, Mich, Berk, and GULC.
Go get em, SehMeSerrious! Good luck!
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:16 pm
by 20130312
FavoriteColorGRUE wrote:I'm a reverse splitter with good news from Northwestern, Mich, Berk, and GULC.
Go get em, SehMeSerrious! Good luck!
Congrats, that's awesome! Maybe "retake" isn't always TCR...
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:07 pm
by IAFG
InGoodFaith wrote:FavoriteColorGRUE wrote:I'm a reverse splitter with good news from Northwestern, Mich, Berk, and GULC.
Go get em, SehMeSerrious! Good luck!
Congrats, that's awesome! Maybe "retake" isn't always TCR...

except if you have a high GPA and a high LSAT you get more acceptances and more $$$... so yes, yes it is.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:41 pm
by lsdream
I'm a big time reverse splitter (and URM) and received good news from Cornell, UVA, UC Berkeley, UPenn and UChicago. Good luck.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:20 pm
by 20130312
IAFG wrote:InGoodFaith wrote:FavoriteColorGRUE wrote:I'm a reverse splitter with good news from Northwestern, Mich, Berk, and GULC.
Go get em, SehMeSerrious! Good luck!
Congrats, that's awesome! Maybe "retake" isn't always TCR...

except if you have a high GPA and a high LSAT you get more acceptances and more $$$... so yes, yes it is.
Shh don't post that here. I need reverse splitters to exist so they can balance out my stats.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:22 pm
by JamMasterJ
Seh, what are your stats?
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:16 pm
by SehMeSerrious
Heh, you guys are gonna hate me but... I haven't taken the LSAT yet (I'm about to in June.) I'm just really nervous about it right now because I won't have as much time to study for it as I want because of other commitments. My LSAC GPA is 3.89 and won't go up or down because of my massive unit count.
I am of course going to try to get the highest score possible, but of course there are no guarantees so I'm planning ahead just in case; I'm interested in joint PhD programs and not many schools offer a solid PhD program in what I want to do. I realized finding the right program and the right POIs on the PhD side can be more involved and time-consuming than looking at the T14 law school programs and I like to plan ahead.
But hopefully this thread is useful for anyone else interested in T14 schools that are reverse-splitter friendly.
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:44 pm
by IAFG
SehMeSerrious wrote:Heh, you guys are gonna hate me but... I haven't taken the LSAT yet (I'm about to in June.) I'm just really nervous about it right now because I won't have as much time to study for it as I want because of other commitments. My LSAC GPA is 3.89 and won't go up or down because of my massive unit count.
I am of course going to try to get the highest score possible, but of course there are no guarantees so I'm planning ahead just in case; I'm interested in joint PhD programs and not many schools offer a solid PhD program in what I want to do. I realized finding the right program and the right POIs on the PhD side can be more involved and time-consuming than looking at the T14 law school programs and I like to plan ahead.
But hopefully this thread is useful for anyone else interested in T14 schools that are reverse-splitter friendly.
So get off the Internet and get to work dumbass
Re: T14 for Reverse Splitters
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:53 am
by SehMeSerrious
IAFG wrote:So get off the Internet and get to work dumbass
I wasn't asking about my chances - the question was pretty generic and the answers help other people looking through the forum, not just me.
ETA: But your advice is credited, thanks.