Is UC Hastings comparable at all to UCLA or USC for Nor Cal?
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:30 am
So I've been looking at UC Hastings videos on youtube and I must say...I'm very impressed. For a school that's only a few buildings and looks like total shit on the outside, it actually looks very nice on the inside and I never realized how cool it was to be in the heart of San Francisco. Looks a lot better than Davis or Los Angeles lol (UC Davis, UCLA, and USC are other schools I'm looking into).
Anyways, I'm being very realistic about my school choices and my LSAT score, so Hastings is a school I'm considering. The only reason I'm worried about going to a school like Hastings is because of the employment prospects. After reading a bunch of threads on TLS, I believe around the top 20% or so in Hastings get big law and everyone else is on their own, if not, screwed.
But I've also heard that UC Hastings places and does just as well in the Bay Area/Nor Cal as does UCLA and USC in So Cal. Is this true? Are they "similar" caliber schools. Obviously UCLA and USC are great in So Cal, but it's not like they're T14 material and neither school will place 50% of their class in big law (from what I've read, it's more like top 1/3).
Personally one reason I'm asking this is also just for a ego/pride thing. I guess knowing UC Hastings is not a bad school and is comparable to UCLA or USC would make me not feel as "dumb" for attending a lower ranked school if I don't get into UCLA or USC.
For the record, I've been PTing on average 158-160, so UC Hastings is a more realistic reach for me (need around 163-164 to get in) than UCLA and USC (need around 167-169).
Anyways, I'm being very realistic about my school choices and my LSAT score, so Hastings is a school I'm considering. The only reason I'm worried about going to a school like Hastings is because of the employment prospects. After reading a bunch of threads on TLS, I believe around the top 20% or so in Hastings get big law and everyone else is on their own, if not, screwed.
But I've also heard that UC Hastings places and does just as well in the Bay Area/Nor Cal as does UCLA and USC in So Cal. Is this true? Are they "similar" caliber schools. Obviously UCLA and USC are great in So Cal, but it's not like they're T14 material and neither school will place 50% of their class in big law (from what I've read, it's more like top 1/3).
Personally one reason I'm asking this is also just for a ego/pride thing. I guess knowing UC Hastings is not a bad school and is comparable to UCLA or USC would make me not feel as "dumb" for attending a lower ranked school if I don't get into UCLA or USC.
For the record, I've been PTing on average 158-160, so UC Hastings is a more realistic reach for me (need around 163-164 to get in) than UCLA and USC (need around 167-169).