Top Law Schools

If they place like they did in 2010 will people still make excuses for them immensely out preforming NU, Duke, Michigan, NYU, UVA and Berkeley or annihilating Vandy and Texas?

Everyone at Cornell will immediately get laid.

Somewhat less shitty than others is "amazing"? What about all the previous years when those other schools posted better numbers?

rayiner wrote:Somewhat less shitty than others is "amazing"? What about all the previous years when those other schools posted better numbers?

I would say 58% vs 30s and 40s is not just less shitty but I guess it is? To be fair absolutely yea the others could see higher numbers this year but what if they don't will you shit a rainbow?

I will still view Cornell as a low tier ivy league school that licks the ass of every other ivy league school except brown and that is full of mediocre students who are prestige whores.

$1.99 wrote:I will still view Cornell as a low tier ivy league school that licks the ass of every other ivy league school except brown and that is full of mediocre students who are prestige whores.

and I'm sure they will be glad to get their tongue all up in there to have the 58% over 30-40s I know I would lick lick

troll harder

Grizz wrote:troll harder

I am not trolling darling I really want to know.

I will admit, pro-Cornell trolling is kinda new and intriguing.

Well, new, at least.

vanwinkle wrote:I will admit, pro-Cornell trolling is kinda new and intriguing.

Well, new, at least.

It seemed fair that they get a turn. Next up is strong anti-Stanfurd trolling.

This is one of the worst thread concepts I have ever seen on tls.com.

OP, Cornell almost always posts "amazing" NLJ stats. Last year was the outlier, not this year.

Aberzombie1892 wrote:This is one of the worst thread concepts I have ever seen on tls.com.

OP, Cornell almost always posts "amazing" NLJ stats. Last year was the outlier, not this year.

so they always post 58% awesome!!

monarchylover wrote:

Aberzombie1892 wrote:This is one of the worst thread concepts I have ever seen on tls.com.

OP, Cornell almost always posts "amazing" NLJ stats. Last year was the outlier, not this year.

so they always post 58% awesome!!

Wut?

"Amazing" in this context is relative to the rest of the T14. Cornell normally is within the top 8 of the T14 in terms of immediate NLJ placement post law school. Frequently, it's in the top 6.

I remember reading a few months back that the numbers were already leaked for Cornell, and they dropped drastically....I think there was an article in above the law, Were those numbers real?

icouldbuyu wrote:I remember reading a few months back that the numbers were already leaked for Cornell, and they dropped drastically....I think there was an article in above the law, Were those numbers real?

I think about 40% of the class got NLJ 250 SAs. But to be fair class of 2011 was generally screwed, it's not a Cornell problem.

$1.99 wrote:I will still view Cornell as a low tier ivy league school that licks the ass of every other ivy league school except brown and that is full of mediocre students who are prestige whores.

I shudder to know what you think of my UG alma mater.

$1.99 wrote:I will still view Cornell as a low tier ivy league school that licks the ass of every other ivy league school except brown and that is full of mediocre students who are prestige whores.

Did you even go to an ivy...if not...move along...

In an indirect way this thread gets at something that interests me, which is the relationship of job placement to school prestige. I'm not sure one necessarily absolutely follows the other.

etlien wrote:

$1.99 wrote:I will still view Cornell as a low tier ivy league school that licks the ass of every other ivy league school except brown and that is full of mediocre students who are prestige whores.

Did you even go to an ivy...if not...move along...

why else would i be poking fun of lower tier ivy league schools? by your hostility, i am going to assume you went to the lower tier schools. hahaha don't be so sensitive

$1.99 wrote:

etlien wrote:

$1.99 wrote:I will still view Cornell as a low tier ivy league school that licks the ass of every other ivy league school except brown and that is full of mediocre students who are prestige whores.

Did you even go to an ivy...if not...move along...

why else would i be poking fun of lower tier ivy league schools? by your hostility, i am going to assume you went to the lower tier schools. hahaha don't be so sensitive

Brown is hardly a lower tier Ivy. Penn and Cornell are.

lol are you kidding me you clown? you and your buddies at brown are the only ones who are in denial. move along man.

etlien wrote:

$1.99 wrote:

etlien wrote:

$1.99 wrote:I will still view Cornell as a low tier ivy league school that licks the ass of every other ivy league school except brown and that is full of mediocre students who are prestige whores.

Did you even go to an ivy...if not...move along...

why else would i be poking fun of lower tier ivy league schools? by your hostility, i am going to assume you went to the lower tier schools. hahaha don't be so sensitive

Brown is hardly a lower tier Ivy. Penn and Cornell are.

Not since the early 90s. Penn lacks lay prestige, but as far as ivy undergrads go, it's in the middle of the pack. As for Brown, maybe the name used to carry more weight, but the times are-a-changing.

The way I see it:

Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Penn/Columbia, Dartmouth, Cornell, Brown

that is the way the world sees it and it is a fact, i am sorry you wasted your time at brown. isn't that where that dude from the movie Varsity Blues went to?

$1.99 wrote:that is the way the world sees it and it is a fact, i am sorry you wasted your time at brown. isn't that where that dude from the movie Varsity Blues went to?

Does that mean I cheated by going to a state school, saving a shit-ton of $$$, and getting into an ivy LS anyway?