MVP or Reapply?
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:15 pm
4.0/170, PTing in the 176-180 range retook in June and got a 175. Do I take $60k at MVP (they say they won't give me anymore) or reapply next year?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=159490
Are you kidding me? Those numbers are competitive for a named scholly at MVP. Even if they don't snag CCN by reapplying, (which they will, with money, maybe a lot of money), they will get substantially more money at MVP. And they have a realistic shot at YHS as DF said.duckmoney wrote:What is it with this site and the reapply mantra?
Go to MVP. That's a great deal and you probably wouldn't do too much better with your numbers anyway. It's not worth a year of your life.
is he going to jail for a year or something? surely he can find something interesting to do.duckmoney wrote:What is it with this site and the reapply mantra?
Go to MVP. That's a great deal and you probably wouldn't do too much better with your numbers anyway. It's not worth a year of your life.
Wow, reading comp fail. Thought he was going to reapply with a 170. Yes, 175 / 4.0 = full ride at MVP / in at Harvard. Reapply makes a lot more sense.Kabuo wrote:Are you kidding me? Those numbers are competitive for a named scholly at MVP. Even if they don't snag CCN by reapplying, (which they will, with money, maybe a lot of money), they will get substantially more money at MVP. And they have a realistic shot at YHS as DF said.duckmoney wrote:What is it with this site and the reapply mantra?
Go to MVP. That's a great deal and you probably wouldn't do too much better with your numbers anyway. It's not worth a year of your life.
They are dumb and have a bad idea of how much debt you would have even minus 60k.adam1 wrote:Thanks for the replies. Honestly, my issue is that I work around a lot of lawyers, and they all look at me like I'm crazy just for retaking. I've mentioned reapplying now a few times, and often they respond, "what the hell is wrong with (MVP)!? 60k is not enough!?"
Good to know that I'm not crazy.
Those lawyers attend MVP and are biased. MVP with 60k is great, but you on the other hand, will go to HYS or CCN with >$60k. (Or MVP with a full scholarship)adam1 wrote:Thanks for the replies. Honestly, my issue is that I work around a lot of lawyers, and they all look at me like I'm crazy just for retaking. I've mentioned reapplying now a few times, and often they respond, "what the hell is wrong with (MVP)!? 60k is not enough!?"
Good to know that I'm not crazy.
Hell, I'd reapply even if it meant doing absolutely nothing and relaxing for a year.Cavalier wrote:4.0/175 makes you competitive at YHS and should guarantee you a larger scholarship at some T10 school. I would reapply if you have something worthwhile to do in the meantime.
+1, reapply.Kabuo wrote: Are you kidding me? Those numbers are competitive for a named scholly at MVP. Even if they don't snag CCN by reapplying, (which they will, with money, maybe a lot of money), they will get substantially more money at MVP. And they have a realistic shot at YHS as DF said.
I disagree with the bolded. The further you get from law school, the less your school matters. I think that is probably what is influencing this opinion. MVP are fine schools and offer you plenty of exit options.fingersxd wrote:They are dumb and have a bad idea of how much debt you would have even minus 60k.adam1 wrote:Thanks for the replies. Honestly, my issue is that I work around a lot of lawyers, and they all look at me like I'm crazy just for retaking. I've mentioned reapplying now a few times, and often they respond, "what the hell is wrong with (MVP)!? 60k is not enough!?"
Good to know that I'm not crazy.
Ignore the blithering idiots and reapply...o, and congrats.
In this case, worthwhile to do in the meantime means sitting on his butt and doing nothing in order to collect $$$ at those schools or even possibly at a better school.Cavalier wrote:4.0/175 makes you competitive at YHS and should guarantee you a larger scholarship at some T10 school. I would reapply if you have something worthwhile to do in the meantime.
No one is saying MVP are bad schools. But taking MVP w/ $60k when you can potentially get a full-tuition scholarship at the same schools is dumb. So the real difference isn't just the level of schools OP is looking at, but that OP might come away with substantially less debt after reapplying, which certainly gives him/her better exit options.run26.2 wrote:I disagree with the bolded. The further you get from law school, the less your school matters. I think that is probably what is influencing this opinion. MVP are fine schools and offer you plenty of exit options.
I would probably reapply too, but if you are going to succeed coming out of HYS, you would have succeeded coming out of MVP as well. The real difference, IMO, is if you are slightly below median at the schools.
I was talking about the attorneys with whom OP was interacting. I agree that coming out with less debt is the preferred outcome. But even as you point out, this is only a potentiality and not a sure thing.Dany wrote:No one is saying MVP are bad schools. But taking MVP w/ $60k when you can potentially get a full-tuition scholarship at the same schools is dumb. So the real difference isn't just the level of schools OP is looking at, but that OP might come away with substantially less debt after reapplying, which certainly gives him/her better exit options.run26.2 wrote:I disagree with the bolded. The further you get from law school, the less your school matters. I think that is probably what is influencing this opinion. MVP are fine schools and offer you plenty of exit options.
I would probably reapply too, but if you are going to succeed coming out of HYS, you would have succeeded coming out of MVP as well. The real difference, IMO, is if you are slightly below median at the schools.
Getting a T-10 full ride is uncertain, but OP will absolutely get a larger scholarship to the same school or a better one next year. That is a sure thing.run26.2 wrote: I agree that coming out with less debt is the preferred outcome. But even as you point out, this is only a potentiality and not a sure thing.