Page 1 of 2

If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 11:58 pm
by ucsd2011
would you still think it is better than Hastings?

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:05 am
by powerlawyer06
I used to know a General who seemed to love answering and debating this question...

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:06 am
by Lasers
who thinks davis is better than hastings!?! i'll fight 'em! :)

kidding.

they are peer schools. both have pros and cons, but overall are extremely comparable. both are great schools in a tough general area (northern ca/bay area) during a tough economic period. better times are hopefully ahead.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:51 am
by crit_racer
Davis better than hastings? I don't think tso!

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:57 am
by romothesavior
powerlawyer06 wrote:I used to know a General who seemed to love answering and debating this question...
I miss him tso much.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:11 am
by kapital98
powerlawyer06 wrote:I used to know a General who seemed to love answering and debating this question...
:D :D :D :D

OP: The question seems slanted. What about the people who think Hastings is better than Davis regardless of rankings? General Tso would be all over this...

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:08 pm
by 20160810
Yes.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:22 pm
by prezidentv8
SBL wrote:Yes.
Your avatar, I like it.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:25 pm
by bk1
There isn't an appreciable edge between them.

But Davis has far far lower CoL.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:39 pm
by kings84_wr
prezidentv8 wrote:
SBL wrote:Yes.
Your avatar, I like it.
+1

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:48 pm
by 20160810
bk187 wrote:There isn't an appreciable edge between them.

But Davis has far far lower CoL.
Maybe Burgers & brew isn't an appreciable advantage to you....

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:50 pm
by camelcrema
SBL wrote:
bk187 wrote:There isn't an appreciable edge between them.

But Davis has far far lower CoL.
Maybe Burgers & brew isn't an appreciable advantage to you....
+1

+Guad's

+The Nugget

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:50 pm
by bk1
SBL wrote:Maybe Burgers & brew isn't an appreciable advantage to you....
I was going to say "only when combined with Lamppost," but who am I kidding? Either one by itself is worth it. :D

Now I'm hungry.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 pm
by bk1
camelcrema wrote:+Guad's

+The Nugget
I never got people's infatuation with Guad's. I mean it's decent/good Mexican food but it never blew me away like it seemed to for my friends.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:54 pm
by camelcrema
bk187 wrote:
I never got people's infatuation with Guad's. I mean it's decent/good Mexican food but it never blew me away like it seemed to for my friends.
I respect that, I definitely know people who weren't all that wowed by it. I, however, am part of the group that went into Guad's withdrawals over winter breaks.


Edit: but yes, I would think Davis > Hastings after having lived in Davis and worked in SF, but only based on quality of life.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:01 pm
by Peachfuzz

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:11 pm
by flexityflex86
Peachfuzz wrote:Davis State of Mind:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzztu9xxd9U
brilliant.

wish the camera work was better. why didn't they get a tripod if they were gonna do all this work?

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:17 pm
by mettasutta
Not that it means much placement-wise, but what accounts for UC Davis' meteoric rise in rankings? Wasn't it in the 40s a mere three years ago?

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:07 pm
by 20160810
bk187 wrote:
camelcrema wrote:+Guad's

+The Nugget
I never got people's infatuation with Guad's. I mean it's decent/good Mexican food but it never blew me away like it seemed to for my friends.
It depends which one you go to. Seriously. The one on Mace is tons better than the other one.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:12 am
by crumpetsandtea
Holy shit Burgers and Brew. HOW DID I NOT VISIT BURGERS AND BREW WHEN I WENT BACK FOR PICNIC DAY????

Well, other than the fact that it was crazy crowded. But fuck. I'm an idiot.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:51 am
by amissionsix
camelcrema wrote:
bk187 wrote:
Edit: but yes, I would think Davis > Hastings after having lived in Davis and worked in SF, but only based on quality of life.
I guess that depends on what the definition of quality of life is...

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:33 pm
by crit_racer
WTF is this? Are y'all seriously arguing that the QOL is better in Davis than in SF?

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:37 pm
by bk1
crit_racer wrote:WTF is this? Are y'all seriously arguing that the QOL is better in Davis than in SF?
As someone who has spent significant time in both places, I can definitely see the appeal of Davis. Quieter, less distractions, cheaper, more open, etc. Would I want to live in Davis as someone in the workforce? No. Would I want to live in Davis over SF as a law student? Very possibly.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:45 pm
by crit_racer
bk187 wrote:
crit_racer wrote:WTF is this? Are y'all seriously arguing that the QOL is better in Davis than in SF?
As someone who has spent significant time in both places, I can definitely see the appeal of Davis. Quieter, less distractions, cheaper, more open, etc. Would I want to live in Davis as someone in the workforce? No. Would I want to live in Davis over SF as a law student? Very possibly.
Point taken. I would still prioritize living in a stimulating environment, but that's b/c I deal well with distractions. Besides, I figure you can always find a quiet place to study (even in SF). Having said that, i know a chick who moved to NY to attend Fordham Law and messed up her 1L year pretty badly due to excessive partying, etc.

Another reason why it's important to be mature and have a solid understanding of yourself before choosing a school/starting LS.

Re: If Davis was not ranked 23rd...

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:57 pm
by bk1
crit_racer wrote:Point taken. I would still prioritize living in a stimulating environment, but that's b/c I deal well with distractions. Besides, I figure you can always find a quiet place to study (even in SF). Having said that, i know a chick who moved to NY to attend Fordham Law and messed up her 1L year pretty badly due to excessive partying, etc.

Another reason why it's important to be mature and have a solid understanding of yourself before choosing a school/starting LS.
I can work well with distractions too. Though having a giant fucking apartment for a lot less money might easily sell me on Davis over SF (as a student), and I think that might be one of the reasons I would choose Davis over Hastings (if I were making that choice).