Stipulations Vs No stipulations
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:41 pm
Alright so I've posted here before with the situation but would like other TLSers take on my situation. I am already pretty set on my choice but they are between Loyola NOLA full ride with a 2.7 stip and Chicago-Kent 20k a year no stipulation. Ive done the math and my best case scenario in NOLA and Best case in Chicago would be about 38K difference with a max difference between the two being 60k COL included.
As far as my future career aspirations go I am uncertain. I wouldn't mind practicing in chicago for a few years after graduation but I know I would not want to live in NOLA after graduation as I would not study or practice civil law. In addition I spoke to a lot of NOLA students who say the stipulation is quite high and non of their friends have kept 100%. Which would you chose of the two? (retake comments already been said, I got it.)
As far as my future career aspirations go I am uncertain. I wouldn't mind practicing in chicago for a few years after graduation but I know I would not want to live in NOLA after graduation as I would not study or practice civil law. In addition I spoke to a lot of NOLA students who say the stipulation is quite high and non of their friends have kept 100%. Which would you chose of the two? (retake comments already been said, I got it.)