Fordham ($) or American ($ for 1L year) or retake
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:56 pm
really confused. I love NYC, I love DC. SA is in DC for at least 3 years. HELP!
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=149085
Both of these options are very risky. What are your numbers?lawbie wrote:no idea what i would do after 1 year at American- pray for more $ or try to transfer??
fordham gave me 15k over 3 years...
Ok, definitely don't settle for American. Fordham isn't a horrible option, but its very expensive. I personally wouldn't take the dive with only 15k. That basically just covers the increased cost of living in NYC.lawbie wrote:166 and 3.7 from top 30 university
yeah, seems like a poor cycle for your numbers. I would definitely retake if you think you can improve. every single point counts significantly at this point. I would just go into the test knowing I already have a 166 under my belt and just focus on the questions. I just don't see fordham with 15k as the best option for someone who could potentially have a 3.7/170 and is willing to take the time off. and yes, I think you would fair better even with the same exact stats if you applied again next year. just apply as early as possible and update your PS and resumes. put together a good app.lawbie wrote:yes, willing to take at least 3 months before the october test off. it would be my 3rd try though. know i can get/break 170- had extreme anxiety the first test (probably should have cancelled) and the second test I was too focused on staying calm versus actually practicing. but when i was 'on' i was breaking 170 no sweat.
on, maybe i could be a little 0L/1L gunner and set my sights on trying to transfer up? too risky?
do you think even with my scores now if i reapply for next years cycle i would fair better? maybe the economy will miraculously improve and 2398743729 people won't be seeking refuge in law school?
you act like he bombed. he still got a 166.Veyron wrote:How are you going to do well on LS exams if you can't handle the LSAT? Don't count on transfering ^.
I think he was referring to his anxiety, not his score.FuManChusco wrote:you act like he bombed. he still got a 166.Veyron wrote:How are you going to do well on LS exams if you can't handle the LSAT? Don't count on transfering ^.
Planning to transfer sucks.. Just sayin' from personal experience.. If you aren't entirely satisfied with your options I think TCR is to retake. At least that way you will know you did all you could and hopefully can relax about the school you end up at.lawbie wrote:yes, willing to take at least 3 months before the october test off. it would be my 3rd try though. know i can get/break 170- had extreme anxiety the first test (probably should have cancelled) and the second test I was too focused on staying calm versus actually practicing. but when i was 'on' i was breaking 170 no sweat.
on, maybe i could be a little 0L/1L gunner and set my sights on trying to transfer up? too risky?
do you think even with my scores now if i reapply for next years cycle i would fair better? maybe the economy will miraculously improve and 2398743729 people won't be seeking refuge in law school?
I scored a good 5 points under my PT average due to anxiety, but I have done well on law school exams. I dunno if you can draw a correlation between LSAT performance and law exam performance. Depends on the person I guess...I am a good writerRockyIII wrote:I think he was referring to his anxiety, not his score.FuManChusco wrote:you act like he bombed. he still got a 166.Veyron wrote:How are you going to do well on LS exams if you can't handle the LSAT? Don't count on transfering ^.