Temple or Villanova?
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:41 pm
I need help...pro's and con's of each?!
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=148236
i've been told that many law schools report inflated numbers and that Villanova just got caught...I'm interested in job prospects and quality of education/professors.BlueDiamond wrote:Villanova lies to the ABA, Temple doesn't... so Temple
not inflated LSAT and GPA numbers.. job prospects are similar.. both place in Philly and not really many other places.. last part someone else would have to answer for yougoblue123 wrote:i've been told that many law schools report inflated numbers and that Villanova just got caught...I'm interested in job prospects and quality of education/professors.BlueDiamond wrote:Villanova lies to the ABA, Temple doesn't... so Temple
Villanova's ABA issues will have a negligible effect on local hiring at best. That being said, Temple will almost invariably prove to be the cheaper (and thus better) option.BlueDiamond wrote:Villanova lies to the ABA, Temple doesn't... so Temple
I haven't gotten scholly info yet but I'm out of state so it's not a huge difference between the two.tea_drinker wrote:What are your estimated cost of attendance for each?
Sure, if you want to throw away $15K over the three years. Does Temple allow you to obtain residency after your 1L?goblue123 wrote:I haven't gotten scholly info yet but I'm out of state so it's not a huge difference between the two.tea_drinker wrote:What are your estimated cost of attendance for each?
I grew up on the Main Line. It's a fine place to raise a family, but it has comparatively little to offer for young, single, twentysomethings.LSATclincher wrote:I'm biased because I'm likely attending in 2011. But temple at in state tuition is much better value. If money is no option, it seems the personality of nova is white and mid-upper class. Temple is a bit more blue collar. They value work experience and philly ties. Both schools are equal from what every attorney tells me. Even before I was accepted, every attorney told me to go to temple unless I had some good reason to leave the area.
The only big plus about nova is 3yrs on the affluent main line vs temple's inner city area. But again, the cost is worth the couple years of sacrifice.
It appears doable compared to most schools.tea_drinker wrote:Sure, if you want to throw away $15K over the three years. Does Temple allow you to obtain residency after your 1L?goblue123 wrote:I haven't gotten scholly info yet but I'm out of state so it's not a huge difference between the two.tea_drinker wrote:What are your estimated cost of attendance for each?
LSATclincher wrote:It appears double compared to most schools.tea_drinker wrote:Sure, if you want to throw away $15K over the three years. Does Temple allow you to obtain residency after your 1L?goblue123 wrote:I haven't gotten scholly info yet but I'm out of state so it's not a huge difference between the two.tea_drinker wrote:What are your estimated cost of attendance for each?
It's true. I'm just trying to find a reason to choose nova. It's a good school, but the cost, even for oos, is not worth it compared to temple. I still think those going to nova don't care about cost or didn't get in to temple so they took on the riskier debt load at nova.HeavenWood wrote:I grew up on the Main Line. It's a fine place to raise a family, but it has comparatively little to offer for young, single, twentysomethings.LSATclincher wrote:I'm biased because I'm likely attending in 2011. But temple at in state tuition is much better value. If money is no option, it seems the personality of nova is white and mid-upper class. Temple is a bit more blue collar. They value work experience and philly ties. Both schools are equal from what every attorney tells me. Even before I was accepted, every attorney told me to go to temple unless I had some good reason to leave the area.
The only big plus about nova is 3yrs on the affluent main line vs temple's inner city area. But again, the cost is worth the couple years of sacrifice.
+1. Although it certainly offers less distraction.HeavenWood wrote: I grew up on the Main Line. It's a fine place to raise a family, but it has comparatively little to offer for young, single, twentysomethings.