Page 1 of 2

Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:25 pm
by StateSchoolSplitter
How do they compare?

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:26 pm
by FunkyJD
You'll be working for all of them.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:29 pm
by StateSchoolSplitter
FunkyJD wrote:You'll be working for all of them.
This is fine with me.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:33 pm
by FunkyJD
StateSchoolSplitter wrote:
FunkyJD wrote:You'll be working for all of them.
This is fine with me.
Come to think of it ... me too. :lol:

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:38 pm
by 09042014
NU has very few great, but also very few uglies.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:04 am
by StateSchoolSplitter
*bump*

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:49 am
by AreJay711
For some reason I have this image of you as a 35 year old perv (no offense to the older folks out there) but either way what you really need to find out is how are the women at XXX university not XXX law school.

Lets be honest, you don't really have a preference of law school women over some corruptible freshman undergrads. Hell, they are probably more likely to hook up with you because, as a population, they probably aren't as smart and way more easily impressed. It is even worse if you want a long term relationship because if you ever have kids or anything there is a 50% chance that HER career is doing better and YOU will have to be the one to sacrifice your career to take care of the little beasts. Going after undergrad anthropology majors is probably better on all fronts.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:07 am
by lawandi
OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:41 am
by FuManChusco
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:02 am
by lawandi
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.
have fun with your 2.6 gpa.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:07 am
by beachbum
lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.
have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcxpbhM0DaA

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:38 am
by Grizz
Women are a waste of time. There's plenty of free internet porn. Go study.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:45 am
by St.Remy
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
I can't take this comment seriously with your Lady Gaga avatar.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:50 am
by DieAntwoord
I must be horribly innocent I thought op was a female looking to bond with other females :oops:

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:52 am
by Bildungsroman
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
preach

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:24 am
by dpk711
lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.
have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
Is your GPA/LSAT so much better?? then why not post it in your profile?? Some women have no shame...

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:26 am
by Holly Golightly
Desert Fox wrote:NU has very few great, but also very few uglies.
Going to take this as you calling me one of the very few hot ones. Don't care if that's what you actually meant.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:11 am
by sophia.olive
If you go to NU's website it is loaded with hotties both male and female, but that could just be advertizing.

they are all pretty cute > http://www.law.northwestern.edu/admissions/

http://law.wustl.edu/ numbers 1,5,7,9,10, 12 are cute. (in the slide show)

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:18 am
by mst
sophia.olive wrote:If you go to NU's website it is loaded with hotties both male and female, but that could just be advertizing.

they are all pretty cute > http://www.law.northwestern.edu/admissions/

http://law.wustl.edu/ numbers 1,5,7,9,10, 12 are cute. (in the slide show)
Really? I would have picked 3,8,13,&18.

Now I feel like a dick.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:22 am
by furrywalls
lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.
have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
It might be possible that the fun has already occurred, hence gpa

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:18 am
by StateSchoolSplitter
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
Dehumanize?

Also, for what it's worth, judging by your response I don't think you have any insight into anything going on at t20 schools.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:19 am
by StateSchoolSplitter
sophia.olive wrote:If you go to NU's website it is loaded with hotties both male and female, but that could just be advertizing.

they are all pretty cute > http://www.law.northwestern.edu/admissions/

http://law.wustl.edu/ numbers 1,5,7,9,10, 12 are cute. (in the slide show)
#17 maybe the cutest

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:29 pm
by 3|ink
rad law wrote:Women are a waste of time. There's plenty of free internet porn. Go study.
FTW

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:32 pm
by paratactical
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
OP is less disgusting than all the sand in your vagina.

Re: Women at UVA v. WUSTL v. NU

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:14 pm
by FuManChusco
lawandi wrote:
FuManChusco wrote:
lawandi wrote:OP, you are disgusting. Stop objectifying women. The women at all of these schools are very intelligent people with bright futures. Does it make you feel good to dehumanize them?
someone call the wambulance.
have fun with your 2.6 gpa.
That time of the month?