Top Law Schools

Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Let's break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Enjoy working at McDonalds!

Bluesickle wrote:Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Lets break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

When was the last time Oregon won a national title?

Edit: Lol at adjudicator's post.

Adjudicator wrote:Enjoy working at McDonalds!

OUCH hot coffee $$$$$$$$

maxm2764 wrote:

Bluesickle wrote:Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Lets break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

When was the last time Oregon won a national title?

Edit: Lol at adjudicator's post.

I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them

stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them

+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.

Oh, and the answer is never.

maxm2764 wrote:

stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them

+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc10.htm

usuaggie wrote:

maxm2764 wrote:

stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them

+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc10.htm

Cool bro. That doesn't disprove my earlier post. The only thing that shows is how top-heavy the PAC-10 is. The top two teams are legit, legit enough that they bring the rest of the conference up with them. Look at the drop off between Stanford and Arizona, that's almost laughable.

The top 4 or 5 teams in the SEC are all around the 90 range. So, the conference is not as top-heavy, but that's thanks to the quality of competition within the conference itself.

Nice try.

maxm2764 wrote:

usuaggie wrote:

maxm2764 wrote:

stratocophic wrote:I dunno, but the answer won't be any different after Auburn gets through with them

+1. SEC > Every other conference.


Edit: Quote fail.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc10.htm

Cool bro. That doesn't disprove my earlier post. The only thing that shows is how top-heavy the PAC-10 is. The top two teams are legit, legit enough that they bring the rest of the conference up with them. Look at the drop off between Stanford and Arizona, that's almost laughable.

The top 4 or 5 teams in the SEC are all around the 90 range. So, the conference is not as top-heavy, but that's thanks to the quality of competition within the conference itself.

Nice try.

Lil Weazy just used bro...hilarity ensued

Top marks for the SEC troll!

Bluesickle wrote:

Lil Weazy just used bro...hilarity ensued

Top marks for the SEC troll!

Sarcasm went over your head I guess? PAC-10 delusional also misspelled Weezy.

In the middle of a 16 hour work day perfecting my outlines and re-reading every single Civ pro case we ever read. I needed that laugh, thanks. Though I will say I doubt Texas will be a laugher long with that recruiting class.

Bluesickle wrote:Look at the schools ranked above U of O Law. Are any of them going to the BCS National Championship game?

No?

Bam!

Let's break down the "T-14"
Yale - joke
Harvard - joke in crimson
Stanford - can't hold a second half lead / NERDS, NERDS, NERDS!
Columbia - kitty cats
U Chicago - disqualified, lost in the M.C. Escher building they call a law school
NYU - heads too far up their asses
Berkeley - doesn't travel well
U Penn - nope
Michigan - coach stuck on Josh Groban does not a winning program make
UVA - beat the "U" = tallest midgets in the world
Duke - busy keeping undergrads out of the library and not much else
Northwestern - lost to Wisconsin 453,000 to 7
Cornell - used to be good at basketball
Georgetown - Uh? Hoyas?

Other notables?
Texas - hahahaha!
USC - break the rules? go to jail, right to jail.
ND - if "independent" meant "win" they'd be really good

Facts people:
1)Those of us at U of O have bigger things than exams to worry about
2)Puddles brings cookies to the law library when we seem down
3)Nike says that if we win the "Natty" they'll have jobs for all of us

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history. whens the last time you guys went to a natl champioship, thats right never, last heisman trophy winner, none, you have been to a laughable 23 bowl games of which you only won 9, all americans: 2, so id stfu if i was you.

imbored25 wrote: except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.

And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.

Note, a typical SEC fan:

http://deadspin.com/5705678/natty-light ... out-auburn

Bluesickle wrote:Note, a typical SEC fan:

http://deadspin.com/5705678/natty-light ... out-auburn

Note, a typical day in the tough PAC-10:

http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/n ... id=5885712

What were they fighting about? Who would be over .500?

Edit: That video is hilarious, touche.

Bildungsroman wrote:

imbored25 wrote: except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.

And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.

this, and the fact that the OP was obviously joking.

usuaggie wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:

imbored25 wrote: except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.

And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.

this, and the fact that the OP was obviously joking.

Too bad he isn't funny.

usuaggie wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:

imbored25 wrote: except schools like michigan, texas, nd, usc, not to mention ohio st, nebraska, oklahoma, alabama, all have a tradition and are historically and in the last 10 years the most dominant programs in college football. oregon has no football history.

And if this was a history class then maybe people would care.

this, and the fact that the OP was obviously joking.