3.44, 168
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 7:00 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=137259
Not even a prayer at ED to UVA without a 170. It seriously wouldn't even be worth the $12.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
Harvard! Jk from this list:PDL wrote:Alright TLS, what should be considered my "reach" schools?
UNC-Chapel Hill grad, 3.44 GPA
168 LSAT (third time, though. 159 in June of '08, 160 in Dec. of 2009)
White male
2 years work experience
Any responses are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
I think that seems accuratejustadude55 wrote:Harvard! Jk from this list:PDL wrote:Alright TLS, what should be considered my "reach" schools?
UNC-Chapel Hill grad, 3.44 GPA
168 LSAT (third time, though. 159 in June of '08, 160 in Dec. of 2009)
White male
2 years work experience
Any responses are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
UNC-Chapel Hill--definitely in
UGa--definitely in
Emory--definitely in
Wake Forest--definitely in
William and Mary--definitely in
UCLA (reach, I know)--definitely not in
USC--waitlist-->out
UC-Hastings--in
UC-Davis--in
This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
UVA does seem to like accepting ED's...jt1341 wrote:This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
OP, you made yourself a good list for where you want to practice. I would apply to all those you listed and maybe ED to UCLA just for the hell of it. probably no chance, but it can only help
I wouldn't call it "rediculous." Vandy is not out of the question. And one person who applied to UVA ED this cycle with similar numbers on LSN was WL so I would not say its pointless and a waste of $12. OP wouldn't have a great shot but there is nothing wrong with having a super-reach or two.jt1341 wrote:This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
OP, you made yourself a good list for where you want to practice. I would apply to all those you listed and maybe ED to UCLA just for the hell of it. probably no chance, but it can only help
Vandy is an auto-ding with their medians (3.72/169).thexfactor wrote:id def apply to vandy. Try your hardest on getting into vandy. Vandy is much better in terms of placement than compared to schools in the GW/WUSTL/Emory range.....
Vandy will WL OP then never let him in.nsideirish wrote:Vandy is not out of the question.
UVA likes ED with people who have at least one high number (you are below both medians) so you are definitely out.... Like I wouldn't even waste my money if I were you. Vandy won't let you In either. Ed to ucla would be your best not wasted EDjustadude55 wrote:UVA does seem to like accepting ED's...jt1341 wrote:This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
OP, you made yourself a good list for where you want to practice. I would apply to all those you listed and maybe ED to UCLA just for the hell of it. probably no chance, but it can only help
i'm purposefully waiting till december to possibly ED to UVA.
Not to be a downer (maybe I was just unlucky) but I had similar stats to you and was rejected at USC/UCLA and WL'd at W&M. Make sure to have some backup schools on that list as you're probably right on the bubble for the rest of themPDL wrote:Southeast or West Coast.
My application list so far is:
UNC-Chapel Hill
UGa
Emory
Wake Forest
William and Mary
UCLA (reach, I know)
USC
UC-Hastings
UC-Davis
Thoughts on those? Thanks!
As your numbers twin 2yrs out of UG, with an interest in west coast (and mtn west), I'd 100% agree with this assessment...justadude55 wrote:Harvard! Jk from this list:PDL wrote:Alright TLS, what should be considered my "reach" schools?
UNC-Chapel Hill grad, 3.44 GPA
168 LSAT (third time, though. 159 in June of '08, 160 in Dec. of 2009)
White male
2 years work experience
Any responses are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
UNC-Chapel Hill--definitely in
UGa--definitely in
Emory--definitely in
Wake Forest--definitely in
William and Mary--definitely in
UCLA (reach, I know)--definitely not in
USC--waitlist-->out
UC-Hastings--in
UC-Davis--in
IMO you're a lock at at least Wake, UGA, and Emory (prob w/ $), probably others, so I think you have enough 'safeties'PDL wrote:Thanks to all for the input. To be quite honest, my preference is to stay on the east coast unless I can somehow weasel into UCLA or USC. If it comes down to UNC/UGa/Emory/W+M vs. Hastings/Davis, I'll probably stay out here, unless $$ somehow plays a big role.
Should I consider Wake Forest my safety school, or apply to a few others?
+1krad wrote:IMO you're a lock at at least Wake, UGA, and Emory (prob w/ $), probably others, so I think you have enough 'safeties'PDL wrote:Thanks to all for the input. To be quite honest, my preference is to stay on the east coast unless I can somehow weasel into UCLA or USC. If it comes down to UNC/UGa/Emory/W+M vs. Hastings/Davis, I'll probably stay out here, unless $$ somehow plays a big role.
Should I consider Wake Forest my safety school, or apply to a few others?