3.2 /with 168-172 LSAT where to apply?
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:31 pm
Just looking for thoughts?
Have some ideas but wanted to hear some others opinions.
Thanks
Have some ideas but wanted to hear some others opinions.
Thanks
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=132929
This. The difference between a 168 and a 172 with that GPA will mean the difference between having a shot at the lower T14 or none at all.Patriot1208 wrote:WAIT TILL YOU GET AN LSAT SCORE
With 169, I'd Mich ED.savagecheater wrote:168 - WUSTL
169 - WUSTL
170 - UVA ED
171 - UVA ED
172 (w/ possible WE) - UVA or NU ED
There you go.
Really? That seems like a stretch with that GPA.Desert Fox wrote:With 169, I'd Mich ED.savagecheater wrote:168 - WUSTL
169 - WUSTL
170 - UVA ED
171 - UVA ED
172 (w/ possible WE) - UVA or NU ED
There you go.
It is a stretch, but probably the best bet for the T14.beachbum wrote:Really? That seems like a stretch with that GPA.
Yes, but it's in the realm of possibility. Michigan's median LSAT is 169. Though I got to believe they are trying to increase it.beachbum wrote:Really? That seems like a stretch with that GPA.Desert Fox wrote:With 169, I'd Mich ED.savagecheater wrote:168 - WUSTL
169 - WUSTL
170 - UVA ED
171 - UVA ED
172 (w/ possible WE) - UVA or NU ED
There you go.
169 is too low for mich with a 3.2, even with ED.Desert Fox wrote:Yes, but it's in the realm of possibility. Michigan's median LSAT is 169. Though I got to believe they are trying to increase it.beachbum wrote:Really? That seems like a stretch with that GPA.Desert Fox wrote:With 169, I'd Mich ED.savagecheater wrote:168 - WUSTL
169 - WUSTL
170 - UVA ED
171 - UVA ED
172 (w/ possible WE) - UVA or NU ED
There you go.
But realistically the only shot at the T14. It is possible so if a 3.2/169 really wants the T14 ED'ing Michigan is the best bet that isn't a complete waste.savagecheater wrote:169 is too low for mich with a 3.2, even with ED.
Probably. But, there really isn't a better place to use that ED, so why not. A Non trad with a 3.3 got in RD, two years ago a 169/3.2 got in RD. So it's not impossible.savagecheater wrote:
169 is too low for mich with a 3.2, even with ED.