Aren't we sorta past the no-offering/lathaming stage of ITE? Even deferrals. Arent' those supposed to have worked their way through the system by the time c/o 2012 graduates?doyleoil wrote:Higher offer rates.miamiman wrote: V10 or bust?
Fewer deferrals.
Less lathaming.
All of it kinda converges to make the truly quality firms look better than they used to, eh?
Harvard v. UChicago Forum
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
- sanpiero
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:09 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
please take the money
- doyleoil
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:59 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Maybe. Or maybe all of it says something about the stability of a firm going forward. Of course, who knows, Latham might have the last laugh. Maybe a bit of ruthlessness made them leaner, tighter, and more efficient for the future. But of course if they can't recruit good people, it doesn't really matter.miamiman wrote:Aren't we sorta past the no-offering/lathaming stage of ITE? Even deferrals. Arent' those supposed to have worked their way through the system by the time c/o 2012 graduates?doyleoil wrote:Higher offer rates.miamiman wrote: V10 or bust?
Fewer deferrals.
Less lathaming.
All of it kinda converges to make the truly quality firms look better than they used to, eh?
I don't know enough about law firm economics, that much is clear.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Didn't you have 2 weeks to decide... three weeks ago?
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
sorry IAFGIAFG wrote: STFU EMMA
Apparently there is about as much work for new grad R.N.s as there is for lawyers right now.IAFG wrote: how about instead i forget law school, get my R.N. and raise our kids?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Apparently there is about as much work for new grad R.N.s as there is for lawyers right now. [/quote]Emma. wrote: how about instead i forget law school, get my R.N. and raise our kids?
oh? someone pls tell my mother ASAP so she stops telling me to get a cut of the medical pie then
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Public office aspirations. That'd be it. And even that is not worth the $140k-ish.miamiman wrote:Describe a scenario in which you'd advise going to HLSmallard wrote:If you want to go into firm work, you take the money here.
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:02 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
With today being the last day to make a decision... I was wondering if anyone else had any more input...
I'm prly leaning slightly towards UChi... but nervous about passing up the holy grail that is Harvard for a measly $135k
Thanks!!
I'm prly leaning slightly towards UChi... but nervous about passing up the holy grail that is Harvard for a measly $135k
Thanks!!
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Go look up the loan payments on 135K over 10 years. Uchi it is.swimbrad wrote:With today being the last day to make a decision... I was wondering if anyone else had any more input...
I'm prly leaning slightly towards UChi... but nervous about passing up the holy grail that is Harvard for a measly $135k
Thanks!!
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:02 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Thanks DF - I was wondering if you're opinion would change since the beginning of this thread - appreciate you stopping byDesert Fox wrote:Go look up the loan payments on 135K over 10 years. Uchi it is.swimbrad wrote:With today being the last day to make a decision... I was wondering if anyone else had any more input...
I'm prly leaning slightly towards UChi... but nervous about passing up the holy grail that is Harvard for a measly $135k
Thanks!!
- someones alt
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
I'd take Chicago in a heartbeat if they offered me that scholarship, but they were cheap with me
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
It's well known you lack rigor.APimpNamedSlickback wrote:its pretty tough not to take uchicago unless you are gunning for the absolute most uber prestigious things you can do with a law degree. so if you want clerk on the supreme court or something like that, you should still take harvard. also, if youve got any political ambitions, same deal. but for 99% of people, chicago is the credited choice in this scenario.
fwiw, i'd turn down a full ride at chicago for sticker at h.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mallard
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:45 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
I don't think this is right. I'm not really sure it's that much easier to clerk at SCOTUS from Harvard than from Chicago (Chicago is small, less competitive student body intellectually, 7th Circuit connections, top professors). As for political ambitions, the mobility and flexibility you have with no debt is probably a much better route to the types of first jobs that can get you politically involved than BIGLAW is.APimpNamedSlickback wrote:its pretty tough not to take uchicago unless you are gunning for the absolute most uber prestigious things you can do with a law degree. so if you want clerk on the supreme court or something like that, you should still take harvard. also, if youve got any political ambitions, same deal. but for 99% of people, chicago is the credited choice in this scenario.
fwiw, i'd turn down a full ride at chicago for sticker at h.
- doyleoil
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:59 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
such a cheap shot, mallardmallard wrote:[(Chicago is small, less competitive student body intellectually)
i mean, i know us midwestern country rubes can't compete with the high-falutin east coast and its cadre of brilliant, but highly mentally disturbed, geniuses
so i'll just say that i know y'all have more than your share of dumbs out there (i know because us midwesterners sent them there)
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
- mallard
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:45 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
haha. I was hoping you'd catch that.doyleoil wrote:such a cheap shot, mallardmallard wrote:[(Chicago is small, less competitive student body intellectually)
i mean, i know us midwestern country rubes can't compete with the high-falutin east coast and its cadre of brilliant, but highly mentally disturbed, geniuses
so i'll just say that i know y'all have more than your share of dumbs out there (i know because us midwesterners sent them there)
Seriously, though, I do think Chicago's clerkship placement is one of the exceptions to my general rule that attending the higher school is always better because differences in student-body talent don't quite match differences in prestige and placement.
APNS, I don't really know much about the HLS alumni network and seeking elected office. Can you give me an example of how this would play out? I have friends at school who are considering running for office, and I used to consider it myself (lulz), but it's not as though I get to vote in my friend's election for District Attorney somewhere in Kansas just because I went to Harvard Law.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
- mallard
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:45 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Yeah, this might be true, but I don't really think Obama's HLR buddies were major bundlers or contributors compared to Oprah and Warren Buffett etc. Maybe in his early campaigns for the state senate, the House, and the Senate.APimpNamedSlickback wrote:all of my dc friends that are into politics tell me to obsessively keep peoples' business cards so that i can eventually hit them up for donations. it seems like going to school there helps with that sort of thing. as an example, in his senate and potus campaigns, obama leveraged the hell out of hls people for cash and intellectual support.
Also, frankly, I fucking hate the idea of doing this, which is why I'm not sure I can ever run for anything.
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:02 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Yea - I could never make it in politics..
APNS - I think that the lay prestige of Harvard is one of the major things keeping it in the race (whether or not it should is probably an irrelevant question). I definitely decided it was worth 60k... but is it worth 135k+interest... that my friend is the question
APNS - I think that the lay prestige of Harvard is one of the major things keeping it in the race (whether or not it should is probably an irrelevant question). I definitely decided it was worth 60k... but is it worth 135k+interest... that my friend is the question
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- someones alt
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
So you said yesterday was the last day for a decision, and I'm curious what choice you ended up making
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:02 am
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Sorry for the delay... I wanted to wait until it was official (although I thought when I said I was going to Harvard it was official...someones alt wrote:So you said yesterday was the last day for a decision, and I'm curious what choice you ended up making
but - UChicago was the choice - I just couldn't turn down that kind of money for what I want to do (hopefully I'll agree with this analysis in three years)
thanks again to everyone who contributed their opinion, they were (mostly) very helpful
- hiromoto45
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Congrats!swimbrad wrote:Sorry for the delay... I wanted to wait until it was official (although I thought when I said I was going to Harvard it was official...someones alt wrote:So you said yesterday was the last day for a decision, and I'm curious what choice you ended up making
but - UChicago was the choice - I just couldn't turn down that kind of money for what I want to do (hopefully I'll agree with this analysis in three years)
thanks again to everyone who contributed their opinion, they were (mostly) very helpful
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Harvard v. UChicago
Honestly man, you couldn't go wrong. Congrats.swimbrad wrote:Sorry for the delay... I wanted to wait until it was official (although I thought when I said I was going to Harvard it was official...someones alt wrote:So you said yesterday was the last day for a decision, and I'm curious what choice you ended up making
but - UChicago was the choice - I just couldn't turn down that kind of money for what I want to do (hopefully I'll agree with this analysis in three years)
thanks again to everyone who contributed their opinion, they were (mostly) very helpful
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login