Fordham w/ 15k vs USC Sticker
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 11:50 am
So looking for y'alls opinion. I want to do BigLaw but I do not particularly care if it is in LA or NYC, which school should I go with.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=118129
If it isn't at least a 50/50 proposition, its a trick. Especially at sticker when you know there are going to be a good 20% of the class walking in with an inherent advantage.Pearalegal wrote:A "trick" seems too negative a term regarding biglaw and USC/Fordham.
OP, I'd go with Fordham. California's economy sucks and yay scholarship money.
DerrickRose wrote:If it isn't at least a 50/50 proposition, its a trick. Especially at sticker when you know there are going to be a good 20% of the class walking in with an inherent advantage.Pearalegal wrote:A "trick" seems too negative a term regarding biglaw and USC/Fordham.
OP, I'd go with Fordham. California's economy sucks and yay scholarship money.
Fair enough if thats your definition of a trick.DerrickRose wrote:If it isn't at least a 50/50 proposition, its a trick. Especially at sticker when you know there are going to be a good 20% of the class walking in with an inherent advantage.Pearalegal wrote:A "trick" seems too negative a term regarding biglaw and USC/Fordham.
OP, I'd go with Fordham. California's economy sucks and yay scholarship money.
The kids with the big scholarships did better on the LSAT than OP and/or were better college students than OP. I know OP is a special flower that is going exude genuine passion for his studies 24/7 for 10 straight months, but the statistics say that he is likely to fail to break the top 1/4 or 1/3 of the class that it will take him to get BigLaw.Pearalegal wrote:Fair enough if thats your definition of a trick.DerrickRose wrote:If it isn't at least a 50/50 proposition, its a trick. Especially at sticker when you know there are going to be a good 20% of the class walking in with an inherent advantage.Pearalegal wrote:A "trick" seems too negative a term regarding biglaw and USC/Fordham.
OP, I'd go with Fordham. California's economy sucks and yay scholarship money.
But how on earth is scholarship money an advantage for employment prospects. Its an advantage after you get employed in terms of debt but...its not like your scholarship comes with more OCI bids or anything.
USC gives you a significantly better chance at biglaw.Bankhead wrote:Calculate all the costs. You might be paying as much for Fordham even with the scholarship with COL. Maybe not though -- I know nothing about LA.
I would say they would both give you about the same shot at biglaw. One thing you should note is that the biglaw lifestyle is more laid back (less hours; less pressure) in CA than in NYC (in general, though obviously this will depend on the firm you end up at).
Why is the case? I know this data is little dated (http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/composite.pdf), but it seems to indicate the opposite. Also, doesn't the fact that CA's economy is tanking also give Fordham an edge?JCougar wrote:USC gives you a significantly better chance at biglaw.
It is the case because your data is a little dated. Here are the latest statistics:bk187 wrote:Why is the case? I know this data is little dated (http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/composite.pdf), but it seems to indicate the opposite. Also, doesn't the fact that CA's economy is tanking also give Fordham an edge?JCougar wrote:USC gives you a significantly better chance at biglaw.
I considered checking the NLJ go-to data before posting but I thought that it was similar. Yeah, after looking at that it seems like USC is the definite choice.JCougar wrote:It is the case because your data is a little dated. Here are the latest statistics:bk187 wrote:Why is the case? I know this data is little dated (http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/composite.pdf), but it seems to indicate the opposite. Also, doesn't the fact that CA's economy is tanking also give Fordham an edge?JCougar wrote:USC gives you a significantly better chance at biglaw.
http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/law%20sc ... page12.pdf
USC c/o 2009 into biglaw: 41.3%
Fordham c/o 2009 into biglaw: 29.4%
That's a 12% difference. If you include clerkship placement, USC = money if you are above median; at Fordham, it probably takes top third.
Of course this is all in regard to c/o 2009, which was mostly before ITE. So take from it what you will.
Also, Fordham COL works to cancel out some of the scholarship.
Of course, even my data is dated, too. No one has any clue what effect ITE has had on either school. Still, if I were a gambling man, I'd gamble on USC.bk187 wrote:I considered checking the NLJ go-to data before posting but I thought that it was similar. Yeah, after looking at that it seems like USC is the definite choice.JCougar wrote:It is the case because your data is a little dated. Here are the latest statistics:bk187 wrote:Why is the case? I know this data is little dated (http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/composite.pdf), but it seems to indicate the opposite. Also, doesn't the fact that CA's economy is tanking also give Fordham an edge?JCougar wrote:USC gives you a significantly better chance at biglaw.
http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/law%20sc ... page12.pdf
USC c/o 2009 into biglaw: 41.3%
Fordham c/o 2009 into biglaw: 29.4%
That's a 12% difference. If you include clerkship placement, USC = money if you are above median; at Fordham, it probably takes top third.
Of course this is all in regard to c/o 2009, which was mostly before ITE. So take from it what you will.
Also, Fordham COL works to cancel out some of the scholarship.
+1, but I hate NYCHopefullawstudent wrote:Personally, I'd pick USC.
I would too. And it looks like the OP didHopefullawstudent wrote:Personally, I'd pick USC.