UH vs. SMU $$ vs. Vanderbilt $
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:57 pm
I’ve narrowed down my choices in attending law school to the titular three options, but it’s hard to narrow them down further without knowing more. My goal is to practice in Texas, and I can live a rich and fulfilling life without a biglaw job (especially in Texas; it isn’t nearly as expensive as other places). The lack of UT in the title implies correctly that I was rejected there. (The lack of Baylor in the title implies correctly that I was waitlisted there!) For the curious, my stats: 3.25/173, non URM (white male).
U. Houston
Pros: I’m from Houston. My family lives there. My cat lives there. I know where I’ll live (Calhoun Lofts). I already know people at UH. As a Texas resident, I get instate tuition (although ya’ll probably know about the hikes). It’s in Texas, so I can network more easily. I could get summer jobs in Houston more easily.
Cons: Not the nicest facilities. Lowest in rank of the three. I’m concerned about how well it places in Texas outside the Houston metro area. It is not in a nice area. How good is its alumni network, and how close-knit is the student body? No scholarship as of right now – and for this thread let’s assume I don’t get a scholarship. Friends of mine who go to UH (not to law school) dislike the administration. I was not happy about the tuition hikes.
SMU
Pros: $25,000 scholarship: believe it or not, it’s the cheapest option. I was impressed by the campus when I visited (definitely nicer than UH). It’s in a nice area. Like UH, it’s in Texas – good for networking.
Cons: Again, placement: I’m concerned about how well it places in Texas outside the Dallas metro area. I don’t think I’m ready to commit to one city over another. From what I’ve read on here, it sounds like SMU places better outside of Dallas than UH places outside of Houston. Of course, most of the students self-select to stay in one city over another.
Vanderbilt
Pros: #17. If I walk in, I’m quite confident I walk out with a job, and probably a good-paying job. Those who got accepted know about the package: folks going to this law school probably haven’t spent time in Nashville before (including me), and I really appreciate the help provided by it. There is a Five Guys nearby. I’ve gotten a really good impression of the school from reading about it on these forums – I’d much rather go here than say Georgetown or Cornell (didn’t apply to either). And I won’t lie, I’d rather tell people I’m going to Vandy Law rather than SMU or (in particular) UH (although I think UHLC is pretty good). I have not visited this school. I’m going to the admitted students day on Friday – really looking forward to that.
Cons: $10,000 scholarship is nice, but the cost (~$57,000 per year) is the huge drawback. I have a very hard time justifying that cost without loans, and I know I want to be debt-free. I can get a job from there, but I want to know what my opportunities in Texas will be from there (as compared to UH and SMU). Certainly it’s possible to get a job in Texas from Vanderbilt – I know Greg Abbott succeeded. Ultimately, what I need to know about Vandy is this: does it place about as well in Texas as UT does? Or would I be competing more against the SMU and UH people?
U. Houston
Pros: I’m from Houston. My family lives there. My cat lives there. I know where I’ll live (Calhoun Lofts). I already know people at UH. As a Texas resident, I get instate tuition (although ya’ll probably know about the hikes). It’s in Texas, so I can network more easily. I could get summer jobs in Houston more easily.
Cons: Not the nicest facilities. Lowest in rank of the three. I’m concerned about how well it places in Texas outside the Houston metro area. It is not in a nice area. How good is its alumni network, and how close-knit is the student body? No scholarship as of right now – and for this thread let’s assume I don’t get a scholarship. Friends of mine who go to UH (not to law school) dislike the administration. I was not happy about the tuition hikes.
SMU
Pros: $25,000 scholarship: believe it or not, it’s the cheapest option. I was impressed by the campus when I visited (definitely nicer than UH). It’s in a nice area. Like UH, it’s in Texas – good for networking.
Cons: Again, placement: I’m concerned about how well it places in Texas outside the Dallas metro area. I don’t think I’m ready to commit to one city over another. From what I’ve read on here, it sounds like SMU places better outside of Dallas than UH places outside of Houston. Of course, most of the students self-select to stay in one city over another.
Vanderbilt
Pros: #17. If I walk in, I’m quite confident I walk out with a job, and probably a good-paying job. Those who got accepted know about the package: folks going to this law school probably haven’t spent time in Nashville before (including me), and I really appreciate the help provided by it. There is a Five Guys nearby. I’ve gotten a really good impression of the school from reading about it on these forums – I’d much rather go here than say Georgetown or Cornell (didn’t apply to either). And I won’t lie, I’d rather tell people I’m going to Vandy Law rather than SMU or (in particular) UH (although I think UHLC is pretty good). I have not visited this school. I’m going to the admitted students day on Friday – really looking forward to that.
Cons: $10,000 scholarship is nice, but the cost (~$57,000 per year) is the huge drawback. I have a very hard time justifying that cost without loans, and I know I want to be debt-free. I can get a job from there, but I want to know what my opportunities in Texas will be from there (as compared to UH and SMU). Certainly it’s possible to get a job in Texas from Vanderbilt – I know Greg Abbott succeeded. Ultimately, what I need to know about Vandy is this: does it place about as well in Texas as UT does? Or would I be competing more against the SMU and UH people?