Brooklyn v St. Johns Forum
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:36 pm
Brooklyn v St. Johns
How much of a difference is there between these schools?
How much extra debt is worth that difference?
Any TLSers out there who currently go to BLS ot St Johns with any experiences or viewpoints to share?
Discuss...
(I know this has thread has probably been started before but a new thread never heard anyone)
How much extra debt is worth that difference?
Any TLSers out there who currently go to BLS ot St Johns with any experiences or viewpoints to share?
Discuss...
(I know this has thread has probably been started before but a new thread never heard anyone)
- najumobi
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
i don't think there's any difference in job prospects between these two schools. i would go to whichever one is cheaper.Terp22 wrote:How much of a difference is there between these schools?
How much extra debt is worth that difference?
Any TLSers out there who currently go to BLS ot St Johns with any experiences or viewpoints to share?
Discuss...
(I know this has thread has probably been started before but a new thread never heard anyone)
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:28 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
Interested in this as well.
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
i disagree. BLS has a way better reputation than St. Johns in NY. BLS rank is 61 while St. Johns ranks 87th. that a huge difference.najumobi wrote:i don't think there's any difference in job prospects between these two schools. i would go to whichever one is cheaper.Terp22 wrote:How much of a difference is there between these schools?
How much extra debt is worth that difference?
Any TLSers out there who currently go to BLS ot St Johns with any experiences or viewpoints to share?
Discuss...
(I know this has thread has probably been started before but a new thread never heard anyone)
- najumobi
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
difference in rankings doesn't equal difference in actual job prospectsam060459 wrote:i disagree. BLS has a way better reputation than St. Johns in NY. BLS rank is 61 while St. Johns ranks 87th. that a huge difference.najumobi wrote:i don't think there's any difference in job prospects between these two schools. i would go to whichever one is cheaper.Terp22 wrote:How much of a difference is there between these schools?
How much extra debt is worth that difference?
Any TLSers out there who currently go to BLS ot St Johns with any experiences or viewpoints to share?
Discuss...
(I know this has thread has probably been started before but a new thread never heard anyone)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:26 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
I'm in New York, and here is my POV:
Brooklyn is in a much better location, and it has a pretty good reputation in New York at the top of its class; however, ITE I'm not sure how well the top of the class is doing in landing a biglaw job.
St. Johns is in a pretty crappy location in Queens, and you also need to be in the very top of your class to get into biglaw.
Is there scholarship money involved? Both schools are ridiculously expensive.
Brooklyn is in a much better location, and it has a pretty good reputation in New York at the top of its class; however, ITE I'm not sure how well the top of the class is doing in landing a biglaw job.
St. Johns is in a pretty crappy location in Queens, and you also need to be in the very top of your class to get into biglaw.
Is there scholarship money involved? Both schools are ridiculously expensive.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:36 pm
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
There's money, but I'd like to know what you think the difference in debt is that legitimizes or unlegitimizes one school over the other?nycparalegal wrote:I'm in New York, and here is my POV:
Brooklyn is in a much better location, and it has a pretty good reputation in New York at the top of its class; however, ITE I'm not sure how well the top of the class is doing in landing a biglaw job.
St. Johns is in a pretty crappy location in Queens, and you also need to be in the very top of your class to get into biglaw.
Is there scholarship money involved? Both schools are ridiculously expensive.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:26 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
How much money from the schools, and what are the stipulations?
- najumobi
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
st. john, brooklyn comparison:
about 70% of students at both schools are employed at graduation.
~60% of both schools' graduates make under 60k/yr.
~15% of graduates at both schools go into govt.
~50% of both schools' grads work for law firms.
~20% of both schools' grads work in business/industry.
federal clerkship placements for both schools are almost nonexistent
brooklyn has a greater percentage going into public interest while st. johns has a greater percentage going into clerkships...that's about the only difference.
about 70% of students at both schools are employed at graduation.
~60% of both schools' graduates make under 60k/yr.
~15% of graduates at both schools go into govt.
~50% of both schools' grads work for law firms.
~20% of both schools' grads work in business/industry.
federal clerkship placements for both schools are almost nonexistent
brooklyn has a greater percentage going into public interest while st. johns has a greater percentage going into clerkships...that's about the only difference.
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
strongly disagree.najumobi wrote:difference in rankings doesn't equal difference in actual job prospectsam060459 wrote:i disagree. BLS has a way better reputation than St. Johns in NY. BLS rank is 61 while St. Johns ranks 87th. that a huge difference.najumobi wrote:i don't think there's any difference in job prospects between these two schools. i would go to whichever one is cheaper.Terp22 wrote:How much of a difference is there between these schools?
How much extra debt is worth that difference?
Any TLSers out there who currently go to BLS ot St Johns with any experiences or viewpoints to share?
Discuss...
(I know this has thread has probably been started before but a new thread never heard anyone)
- nealric
- Posts: 4279
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
This is true for both schools.and you also need to be in the very top of your class to get into biglaw.
I agree with this. One might give you a 7% chance of biglaw and another a 5% chance, but I just don't see that as significant enough to choose one over another. Frankly, both are among worst bargains in legal education in the United States. Sky high tuition + saturated legal market + 3 unequivocally better schools in the same city = Bad deal for students.
i don't think there's any difference in job prospects between these two schools. i would go to whichever one is cheaper.
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
difference rankings does account for difference in employment prospects. if not why are there rankings?
a school with a better rank is ranked better because of several things. take a look at how USNWR calculates rankings for LS:
Quality Assessment (weighted by .40) - Peer Assessment Score (.25) and Assessment Score by Lawyers/Judges (.15)
Selectivity (weighted by .25) - Median LSAT Scores (.125), Median Undergrad GPA (.10), Acceptance Rate (.025)
Placement Success (weighted by .20) - Employment Rates for Graduates (.20)
Bar Passage Rate (.02)
Faculty Resources (weighted by .15) - Expenditures Per Student (1125.), Student/Faculty Ratio (.03), and Library Resources (.0075)
Placement success is given 20% of the weight. Employments prospects for BLS, as the other poster mentioned, is way better than St. Johns because of location. Overall, BLS, as the poll in this thread will show, is a way better choice than St. Johns.
if this doesnt convince OP lets assume he is getting no $$ from either school. St. Johns and BLS tuittion is roughly the same ($1500 difference). For $1500 i would take the school with a higher rank in a heartbeat.
http://www.usnews.com/articles/educatio ... -links:TOP
a school with a better rank is ranked better because of several things. take a look at how USNWR calculates rankings for LS:
Quality Assessment (weighted by .40) - Peer Assessment Score (.25) and Assessment Score by Lawyers/Judges (.15)
Selectivity (weighted by .25) - Median LSAT Scores (.125), Median Undergrad GPA (.10), Acceptance Rate (.025)
Placement Success (weighted by .20) - Employment Rates for Graduates (.20)
Bar Passage Rate (.02)
Faculty Resources (weighted by .15) - Expenditures Per Student (1125.), Student/Faculty Ratio (.03), and Library Resources (.0075)
Placement success is given 20% of the weight. Employments prospects for BLS, as the other poster mentioned, is way better than St. Johns because of location. Overall, BLS, as the poll in this thread will show, is a way better choice than St. Johns.
if this doesnt convince OP lets assume he is getting no $$ from either school. St. Johns and BLS tuittion is roughly the same ($1500 difference). For $1500 i would take the school with a higher rank in a heartbeat.
http://www.usnews.com/articles/educatio ... -links:TOP
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:20 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
As a previous post stated, the location - if nothing else - is very key. BLS is one subway stop away from wall street and st johns is nearly an hour commute from midtown via public transportation...i agree that both schools have a similarly average rep in nyc and the state, but BLS does seem to own a slight edge in that department as well. Money being equal, no reason not to pick BLS over SJU...as far as how much money it would take to pick SJU, thats really not something you can answer without knowing a) your finances and b) exactly how much money they DO offer..if one is free and one is sticker, you know the answer, right? it wont be that simple but you get the idea
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nealric
- Posts: 4279
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
As you get farther down the rankings, it takes a larger and larger rank-number difference to indicate a real difference in job prospects. Remember, those reputation surveys are national. While just about everyone is familiar with the top schools, recognition becomes spotty once you get into the second tier and beyond. The point is that a 20 place rank difference is pretty meaningless between #60 and #80. By contrast, the difference between #1 and #20 is gigantic.difference rankings does account for difference in employment prospects. if not why are there rankings?
Placement success is given 20% weight, but the metric they use is pretty worthless as it counts someone working at McDonalds the same as someone working at Wachtell- they are both "employed".
- sirchristaylor
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:33 pm
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
I've met many Brooklyn grads in BigLaw, but none from St. John's. That's not to say that they don't exist. I believe that Brooklyn's reputation far exceeds St. John's.
- najumobi
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
i guess i feel like job placement should be the most important thing to look at when comparing schools. if the schools place their grads in the same type of jobs with the same salary, why would remote variables like faculty resources, and expenditure per student matter? i focus on the end result, which probably encapsulates alot of different variables.am060459 wrote:difference rankings does account for difference in employment prospects. if not why are there rankings?
a school with a better rank is ranked better because of several things. take a look at how USNWR calculates rankings for LS:
Quality Assessment (weighted by .40) - Peer Assessment Score (.25) and Assessment Score by Lawyers/Judges (.15)
Selectivity (weighted by .25) - Median LSAT Scores (.125), Median Undergrad GPA (.10), Acceptance Rate (.025)
Placement Success (weighted by .20) - Employment Rates for Graduates (.20)
Bar Passage Rate (.02)
Faculty Resources (weighted by .15) - Expenditures Per Student (1125.), Student/Faculty Ratio (.03), and Library Resources (.0075)
Placement success is given 20% of the weight. Employments prospects for BLS, as the other poster mentioned, is way better than St. Johns because of location. Overall, BLS, as the poll in this thread will show, is a way better choice than St. Johns.
if this doesnt convince OP lets assume he is getting no $$ from either school. St. Johns and BLS tuittion is roughly the same ($1500 difference). For $1500 i would take the school with a higher rank in a heartbeat.
http://www.usnews.com/articles/educatio ... -links:TOP
- baboon309
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:21 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
najumobi wrote:i guess i feel like job placement should be the most important thing to look at when comparing schools. if the schools place their grads in the same type of jobs with the same salary, why would remote variables like faculty resources, and expenditure per student matter? i focus on the end result, which probably encapsulates alot of different variables.am060459 wrote:difference rankings does account for difference in employment prospects. if not why are there rankings?
a school with a better rank is ranked better because of several things. take a look at how USNWR calculates rankings for LS:
Quality Assessment (weighted by .40) - Peer Assessment Score (.25) and Assessment Score by Lawyers/Judges (.15)
Selectivity (weighted by .25) - Median LSAT Scores (.125), Median Undergrad GPA (.10), Acceptance Rate (.025)
Placement Success (weighted by .20) - Employment Rates for Graduates (.20)
Bar Passage Rate (.02)
Faculty Resources (weighted by .15) - Expenditures Per Student (1125.), Student/Faculty Ratio (.03), and Library Resources (.0075)
Placement success is given 20% of the weight. Employments prospects for BLS, as the other poster mentioned, is way better than St. Johns because of location. Overall, BLS, as the poll in this thread will show, is a way better choice than St. Johns.
if this doesnt convince OP lets assume he is getting no $$ from either school. St. Johns and BLS tuittion is roughly the same ($1500 difference). For $1500 i would take the school with a higher rank in a heartbeat.
http://www.usnews.com/articles/educatio ... -links:TOP
Nah. You should go to Rutgers.
http://www.law.com/pdf/nlj/20080414empl ... trends.pdf
If you can't get into NYU/Columbia/Fordham, you should go to Rutgers
Cheap Bargain & Better placement
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:16 pm
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
Nah. You should go to Rutgers.
http://www.law.com/pdf/nlj/20080414empl ... trends.pdf
If you can't get into NYU/Columbia/Fordham, you should go to Rutgers
Cheap Bargain & Better placement
+1
- XxSpyKEx
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:48 am
Re: Brooklyn v St. Johns
This.nealric wrote:As you get farther down the rankings, it takes a larger and larger rank-number difference to indicate a real difference in job prospects. Remember, those reputation surveys are national. While just about everyone is familiar with the top schools, recognition becomes spotty once you get into the second tier and beyond. The point is that a 20 place rank difference is pretty meaningless between #60 and #80. By contrast, the difference between #1 and #20 is gigantic.difference rankings does account for difference in employment prospects. if not why are there rankings?
Placement success is given 20% weight, but the metric they use is pretty worthless as it counts someone working at McDonalds the same as someone working at Wachtell- they are both "employed".
USNews rankings are retarded in that they don't even include by far the most important thing when going to law school: career prospects.
I vote go to neither unless: 1) you are going for free including a full living stipend AND 2) you have a UG degree that is pretty much worthless (such as a liberal arts degree). Why? Because you will have wasted 3 years of your life but you won't have lost much in the process.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login