Thanks in advance

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: 3.96 / 169

Postby Rigo » Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:42 pm

gobigred11 wrote:Thanks, I'll definitely consider it. Why does Stanford require a new LOR (yeah that would be a huge inconvenience...)?

No idea why.
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=197451&start=3500#p8270218

It's best to check with the individual schools you could see yourself reapplying to.

gobigred11
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:08 pm

Re: 3.96 / 169

Postby gobigred11 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:46 pm

Yeah, I double-checked with Stanford Law's website and you're right. So here's the interesting part: I actually got THREE LOR's from my college profs just to be safe. Should I only submit two LORs this year and save one for next year? What do you think?
Last edited by gobigred11 on Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: 3.96 / 169

Postby Rigo » Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:48 pm

gobigred11 wrote:Yeah, I double-checked with Stanford Law's website and you're right. So here's the interesting part: I actually got THREE LOR's from my college profs just to be safe. Given the unlikelihood of my Stanford app this cycle with a 169 (assuming I either don't take Feb or don't improve), should I only submit two LORs this year and save one for next year? What do you think?

That seems like a very smart move to do with the schools that require a new letter.




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests