3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Not sure where your numbers will get you? Dying to know where you stand? Come have your palms read by your fellow posters!
Rainy
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:10 pm

3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby Rainy » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:25 pm

Thanks for the help guys.
Last edited by Rainy on Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
thewaves
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 7:26 pm

Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby thewaves » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:28 pm

Shoot for HYS, you're a lock for CCN

Rainy
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:10 pm

Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby Rainy » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:30 pm

Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?

User avatar
Dr.Zer0
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby Dr.Zer0 » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:38 pm

.
Last edited by Dr.Zer0 on Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ManoftheHour
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby ManoftheHour » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:39 pm

Rainy wrote:Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?


Softs, LOR, resumes are TTT.

Enjoy CCN.

User avatar
SupCutie
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:27 pm

Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby SupCutie » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:40 pm

Rainy wrote:Are softs really that little of a factor in admission? And I'm assuming this means most schools will simply look at my highest LSAT score?


Dude... 175. Drop the mic and enjoy T6.

Rainy
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:10 pm

Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby Rainy » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:52 pm

Thanks for the help so far guys - it's much appreciated and I'm feeling a lot better. One final question and I'll leave you all alone and fly majestically into the sunset. How much of a boost does applying ED to Columbia give me? I'd rather go to Stanford, but I don't want to waste my ED opportunity and I'm not sure my chances at the former (as a note I have 3 close family members - sister/parents - who attended Stanford UG, although I doubt admissions gives a rat's ass). Thoughts?

Once again, thank you so much for your time.

User avatar
MoMettaMonk
Posts: 513
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:29 pm

Re: 3.75/175; Terrible resume/PS/non-traditional LSAT history

Postby MoMettaMonk » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:06 pm

Rainy wrote:Thanks for the help so far guys - it's much appreciated and I'm feeling a lot better. One final question and I'll leave you all alone and fly majestically into the sunset. How much of a boost does applying ED to Columbia give me? I'd rather go to Stanford, but I don't want to waste my ED opportunity and I'm not sure my chances at the former (as a note I have 3 close family members - sister/parents - who attended Stanford UG, although I doubt admissions gives a rat's ass). Thoughts?

Once again, thank you so much for your time.


http://www.admissionsbythenumbers.com/

From what we can tell, EDing to Columbia provides no boost, or a boost so small as to not be statistically significant. Generally speaking, a candidate like you EDing is awesome for Columbia, and a pretty bad deal for you.




Return to “What are my chances?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cavalier1138, grades??, massappeal and 4 guests