Top Law Schools

Schools that would take you 3.88 and 160-167
Primarily in the top 50?!?!

everyone from UT down

.

Regulus wrote:lol.... you need to be more specific. 160-167 is a HUGE difference. With a 167 you can get into the T6 if you're lucky, whereas with a 160 you would have trouble breaking the T14.

This. Also, you should retake the LSAT and not waste your GPA.

Looks like OP may not have taken the LSAT yet, based on post history.

OP, get and LSAT over 170 then come back and ask.

TripTrip wrote:Looks like OP may not have taken the LSAT yet, based on post history.

OP, get and LSAT over 170 then come back and ask.

That explains the ridiculous range. 160 - 167, lol.

OP, stop trying to validate your setting a low bar for yourself. Put in the work, dude.

North wrote:

TripTrip wrote:Looks like OP may not have taken the LSAT yet, based on post history.

OP, get and LSAT over 170 then come back and ask.

That explains the ridiculous range. 160 - 167, lol.

OP, stop trying to validate your setting a low bar for yourself. Put in the work, dude.

I am putting in everything I got. But my past of standardized testing might kill me.

itachiuchiha wrote:I am putting in everything I got. But my past of standardized testing might kill me.

The test is 100% learnable. Making the jump from the mid to high 160's to the 170's is the hardest of them all (search the Prep forum, there are threads on this). With enough time and enough work, you WILL get it. If I could do it, you certainly can.

North wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:I am putting in everything I got. But my past of standardized testing might kill me.

The test is 100% learnable. Making the jump from the mid to high 160's to the 170's is the hardest of them all (search the Prep forum, there are threads on this). With enough time and enough work, you WILL get it. If I could do it, you certainly can.

I am at 152 after finishing all 3 bibles. Now I am onto manhattan

itachiuchiha wrote:

North wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:I am putting in everything I got. But my past of standardized testing might kill me.

The test is 100% learnable. Making the jump from the mid to high 160's to the 170's is the hardest of them all (search the Prep forum, there are threads on this). With enough time and enough work, you WILL get it. If I could do it, you certainly can.

I am at 152 after finishing all 3 bibles. Now I am onto manhattan

How long did it take you to get through all three powerscore bibles? Fast studying =/= efficient studying

Are you drilling? Are you writing out explanations of questions you got wrong?

francesfarmer wrote:Fast studying =/= efficient studying

There's a lot more to it than working through the books. Manhattan is credited, though.

francesfarmer wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:

North wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:I am putting in everything I got. But my past of standardized testing might kill me.

The test is 100% learnable. Making the jump from the mid to high 160's to the 170's is the hardest of them all (search the Prep forum, there are threads on this). With enough time and enough work, you WILL get it. If I could do it, you certainly can.

I am at 152 after finishing all 3 bibles. Now I am onto manhattan

How long did it take you to get through all three powerscore bibles? Fast studying =/= efficient studying

yup it was kind of fast. also, no drilling. But I am no where near the end of my studies. I have all the PTs to get through, I have all manhattan books and I have until June. I will take my time.

itachiuchiha wrote:
yup it was kind of fast. also, no drilling. But I am no where near the end of my studies. I have all the PTs to get through, I have all manhattan books and I have until June. I will take my time.

Going through the books without drilling is pointless. Also, consider ordering packets with question sorted by type instead of going through PT's. Its a better and more efficient way to practice the concepts and techniques you learn in the books.

http://www.cambridgelsat.com

itachiuchiha wrote:Schools that would take you 3.88 and 160-167
Primarily in the top 50?!?!

You need to stop creating silly threads on this forum and start studying for the LSAT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/searc ... mit=Search

This is definitely a forum to have questions answered and receive advice, but you're really just asking a bunch of stupid and easily answerable questions. It's fine once and even maybe two or three times, but you've created no less than 41 threads in your 130 posts. Almost all of them are one line questions that could easily be answered in the time it took you to write the post.

cahwc12 wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:Schools that would take you 3.88 and 160-167
Primarily in the top 50?!?!

You need to stop creating silly threads on this forum and start studying for the LSAT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/searc ... mit=Search

This is definitely a forum to have questions answered and receive advice, but you're really just asking a bunch of stupid and easily answerable questions. It's fine once and even maybe two or three times, but you've created no less than 41 threads in your 130 posts. Almost all of them are one line questions that could easily be answered in the time it took you to write the post.

what do you care

itachiuchiha wrote:

cahwc12 wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:Schools that would take you 3.88 and 160-167
Primarily in the top 50?!?!

You need to stop creating silly threads on this forum and start studying for the LSAT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/searc ... mit=Search

This is definitely a forum to have questions answered and receive advice, but you're really just asking a bunch of stupid and easily answerable questions. It's fine once and even maybe two or three times, but you've created no less than 41 threads in your 130 posts. Almost all of them are one line questions that could easily be answered in the time it took you to write the post.

what do you care

You're wasting your time and ours. Go reread the bibles and drill questions types as you finish sections while you wait for the Manhattan books to come..

North wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:

cahwc12 wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:Schools that would take you 3.88 and 160-167
Primarily in the top 50?!?!

You need to stop creating silly threads on this forum and start studying for the LSAT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/searc ... mit=Search

This is definitely a forum to have questions answered and receive advice, but you're really just asking a bunch of stupid and easily answerable questions. It's fine once and even maybe two or three times, but you've created no less than 41 threads in your 130 posts. Almost all of them are one line questions that could easily be answered in the time it took you to write the post.

what do you care

You're wasting your time and ours. Go reread the bibles and drill questions types as you finish sections while you wait for the Manhattan books to come..

I am not wasting my time, i am at work. I don't have books with me

cahwc12 wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:Schools that would take you 3.88 and 160-167
Primarily in the top 50?!?!

You need to stop creating silly threads on this forum and start studying for the LSAT.

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/searc ... mit=Search

This is definitely a forum to have questions answered and receive advice, but you're really just asking a bunch of stupid and easily answerable questions. It's fine once and even maybe two or three times, but you've created no less than 41 threads in your 130 posts. Almost all of them are one line questions that could easily be answered in the time it took you to write the post.

+1. Was just going to comment on this.

Is it bad that when I see someone call themselves reverse splitters I immediately assume poli sci major?

NoodleyOne wrote:Is it bad that when I see someone call themselves reverse splitters I immediately assume poli sci major?

Oh hey.

itachiuchiha wrote:

North wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:what do you care

You're wasting your time and ours. Go reread the bibles and drill questions types as you finish sections while you wait for the Manhattan books to come..

I am not wasting my time, i am at work. I don't have books with me

If you are allowed to fuck around on the internet at work, you should be allowed to study at work.

.

francesfarmer wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:

North wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:what do you care

You're wasting your time and ours. Go reread the bibles and drill questions types as you finish sections while you wait for the Manhattan books to come..

I am not wasting my time, i am at work. I don't have books with me

If you are allowed to fuck around on the internet at work, you should be allowed to study at work.

I know, RIGHT?!?!?!?

Regulus wrote:

francesfarmer wrote: If you are allowed to fuck around on the internet at work, you should be allowed to study at work.

If this were true I might have been able to get a better score on the LSAT.

Credited.