Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168 Forum
-
ldo5014
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 pm
Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
.
Last edited by ldo5014 on Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
are you familiar with lsac.org? you should sign up for the October LSAT there.
-
TTTehehe
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
Take Vermont off of your list.
-
abc12345675
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:27 am
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
There's a lot of energy law being practiced in Texas. Add UT
-
ldo5014
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
.
Last edited by ldo5014 on Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dowu
- Posts: 8298
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
Your LSAT score is not awful. I believe Fatduck is trying to say that with your GPA, you should be exhausting all attempts at a higher LSAT, so that your GPA's benefits are fully maximized.ldo5014 wrote:Fatduck -- I'd rather not retake the LSAT. Is my score really all that awful?
TTT -- I have Vermont on my list because they have a very strong environmental/energy program. Is the prestige of the school that much more important than the program itself?
abc -- I will add UT Austin to my list, thanks!
-
fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
not awful, but you have nothing to lose by retaking in october and quite a lot to gain (namely, harvard yale and/or stanford)ldo5014 wrote:Fatduck -- I'd rather not retake the LSAT. Is my score really all that awful?
TTT -- I have Vermont on my list because they have a very strong environmental/energy program. Is the prestige of the school that much more important than the program itself?
abc -- I will add UT Austin to my list, thanks!
-
ldo5014
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
.
Last edited by ldo5014 on Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
above their medians i guess, 172? 173? check lawschoolnumbers.comldo5014 wrote:What type of score would I need to be competitive at HYS? Also, would you mind telling me your thoughts on my chances at UC Berkeley (and the rest, if you don't mindfatduck wrote:not awful, but you have nothing to lose by retaking in october and quite a lot to gain (namely, harvard yale and/or stanford)ldo5014 wrote:Fatduck -- I'd rather not retake the LSAT. Is my score really all that awful?
TTT -- I have Vermont on my list because they have a very strong environmental/energy program. Is the prestige of the school that much more important than the program itself?
abc -- I will add UT Austin to my list, thanks!)
-
TTTehehe
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Engineer GPA-3.87 LSAT-168
Short answer - Yes.ldo5014 wrote:Fatduck -- I'd rather not retake the LSAT. Is my score really all that awful?
TTT -- I have Vermont on my list because they have a very strong environmental/energy program. Is the prestige of the school that much more important than the program itself?
abc -- I will add UT Austin to my list, thanks!
Also, I'd like if some of you more experienced folks would be able to give me a qualitative idea of my chances at the above listed schools (including UT Austin). Thanks!
