Should I stay or should I go? Forum
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:39 pm
Should I stay or should I go?
Hi,
Im not sure if this is the right forum or not, but I am a freshman(exam week :/) undergrad at the University of Akron. I am positive that I want to go to a top law school. I have taken two practice tests (165,169). I can only believe that a few months of solid study in the summer between by junior and senior year should help me improve upon that even more. Anyways, I'm going to Akron for a minuscule amount ($500 a semester). I decided to got to Akron bc I had tons of credit from PSEOP coursework (65 credit hours). I am double majoring in history and political science, with plans to enter a program that will allow me to graduate from Akron with a MA in history (all in 4 years). I am appreciative of the opportunities for improving my research and writing skills this will provide, but I'm worried that I will underperform my numbers because of the reputation of the school I'm going to. Anyways, I got into Chicago, but I decided to go to Akron because of cost of attendance and comfort with the campus. I want to know if my MA will give me a good enough bump to make up for not going to a prestigious school or should I transfer to a prestigious undergrad? If so, what are my chances with a 31 ACT and a 1950 SAT (I could retake either if neccesarry)? BTW don't troll about spelling and grammar. I'm on my iPad and this is a forum on the Internet, I'm not concerned with either
Thanks!
Im not sure if this is the right forum or not, but I am a freshman(exam week :/) undergrad at the University of Akron. I am positive that I want to go to a top law school. I have taken two practice tests (165,169). I can only believe that a few months of solid study in the summer between by junior and senior year should help me improve upon that even more. Anyways, I'm going to Akron for a minuscule amount ($500 a semester). I decided to got to Akron bc I had tons of credit from PSEOP coursework (65 credit hours). I am double majoring in history and political science, with plans to enter a program that will allow me to graduate from Akron with a MA in history (all in 4 years). I am appreciative of the opportunities for improving my research and writing skills this will provide, but I'm worried that I will underperform my numbers because of the reputation of the school I'm going to. Anyways, I got into Chicago, but I decided to go to Akron because of cost of attendance and comfort with the campus. I want to know if my MA will give me a good enough bump to make up for not going to a prestigious school or should I transfer to a prestigious undergrad? If so, what are my chances with a 31 ACT and a 1950 SAT (I could retake either if neccesarry)? BTW don't troll about spelling and grammar. I'm on my iPad and this is a forum on the Internet, I'm not concerned with either
Thanks!
- ben4847
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:38 pm
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
stay. where you went to school matters very little compared to GPAams212 wrote:Hi,
Im not sure if this is the right forum or not, but I am a freshman(exam week :/) undergrad at the University of Akron. I am positive that I want to go to a top law school. I have taken two practice tests (165,169). I can only believe that a few months of solid study in the summer between by junior and senior year should help me improve upon that even more. Anyways, I'm going to Akron for a minuscule amount ($500 a semester). I decided to got to Akron bc I had tons of credit from PSEOP coursework (65 credit hours). I am double majoring in history and political science, with plans to enter a program that will allow me to graduate from Akron with a MA in history (all in 4 years). I am appreciative of the opportunities for improving my research and writing skills this will provide, but I'm worried that I will underperform my numbers because of the reputation of the school I'm going to. Anyways, I got into Chicago, but I decided to go to Akron because of cost of attendance and comfort with the campus. I want to know if my MA will give me a good enough bump to make up for not going to a prestigious school or should I transfer to a prestigious undergrad? If so, what are my chances with a 31 ACT and a 1950 SAT (I could retake either if neccesarry)? BTW don't troll about spelling and grammar. I'm on my iPad and this is a forum on the Internet, I'm not concerned with either
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:39 pm
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
Thanks, but what if I could get the same GPA at either school would it make a difference then?
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
The degree to which it would give you and advantage would not be worth carrying a backpack from one school to the other. Stay where you are, keep your GPA high, work hard and kill the LSAT.ams212 wrote:Thanks, but what if I could get the same GPA at either school would it make a difference then?
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
If you're going to law school anyway, don't bother rocking the boat on your GPA by transferring schools. Focus on getting as close as you can to a 4.0. If you're rocking a 169 on your second practice test, you should have no problem getting 175+ on the real thing with concerted study. Paired with say a 3.9+ you're a great candidate for Harvard, etc.
DO NOT GO TO CHICAGO. They're a grade-deflationary undergrad and will kill your chance at HYSB (the big GPA-whores as far as law schools go). By and large schools would much rather have a 3.9 from Akron than a 3.6 from U Chicago.
What you should really do in your time is develop interesting softs. Yale/Stanford really care about soft factors, and being strong in those areas is going to do much more for you than transferring undergraduate schools.
DO NOT GO TO CHICAGO. They're a grade-deflationary undergrad and will kill your chance at HYSB (the big GPA-whores as far as law schools go). By and large schools would much rather have a 3.9 from Akron than a 3.6 from U Chicago.
What you should really do in your time is develop interesting softs. Yale/Stanford really care about soft factors, and being strong in those areas is going to do much more for you than transferring undergraduate schools.
Last edited by rayiner on Tue May 01, 2012 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Stanford4Me
- Posts: 6240
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:23 am
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
UG prestige is not that important.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:39 pm
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
rayiner wrote:If you're going to law school anyway, don't bother rocking the boat on your GPA by transferring schools. Focus on getting as close as you can to a 4.0. If you're rocking a 169 on your second practice test, you should have no problem getting 175+ on the real thing with concerted study. Paired with say a 3.9+ you're a great candidate for Harvard, etc.
DO NOT GO TO CHICAGO. They're a grade-deflationary undergrad and will kill your chance at HYSB (the big GPA-whores as far as law schools go). By and large schools would much rather have a 3.9 from Akron than a 3.6 from U Chicago.
What you should really do in your time is develop interesting softs. Yale/Stanford really care about soft factors, and being strong in those areas is going to do much more for you than transferring undergraduate schools.
Ok thanks for the advice everyone
What specifically should I do for an interesting soft? Is a normal internship at a law office good enough to show I'm serious about law school? Or how should I approach making myself a well-rounded candidate?
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
It's better if its not law related. Something to set you apart from the other 175/3.9's.ams212 wrote:rayiner wrote:If you're going to law school anyway, don't bother rocking the boat on your GPA by transferring schools. Focus on getting as close as you can to a 4.0. If you're rocking a 169 on your second practice test, you should have no problem getting 175+ on the real thing with concerted study. Paired with say a 3.9+ you're a great candidate for Harvard, etc.
DO NOT GO TO CHICAGO. They're a grade-deflationary undergrad and will kill your chance at HYSB (the big GPA-whores as far as law schools go). By and large schools would much rather have a 3.9 from Akron than a 3.6 from U Chicago.
What you should really do in your time is develop interesting softs. Yale/Stanford really care about soft factors, and being strong in those areas is going to do much more for you than transferring undergraduate schools.
Ok thanks for the advice everyone
What specifically should I do for an interesting soft? Is a normal internship at a law office good enough to show I'm serious about law school? Or how should I approach making myself a well-rounded candidate?
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:24 am
Re: Should I stay or should I go?
GPA + LSAT = 90% of what is considered for your application
Undergrad school + LOR + Personal Statement + work experience + everything else = 10%
Its sad but true. Law schools are controlled by the the US New rankings because all students/employers care about is the rankings. The rankings are so competitive that even a drop in a few points of a schools average GPA or LSAT scores could cause them to fall significantly in the rankings.
Meanwhile undergrad prestige is not measured so law schools care little about this. When you only value what you measure you risk not valuing what you don't measure
Law schools have to please US News to increase their rankings, US news has to please its law students buyers to sell magazines, the law student buyers have to please the law schools to get in, its a viscous cycle!
Undergrad school + LOR + Personal Statement + work experience + everything else = 10%
Its sad but true. Law schools are controlled by the the US New rankings because all students/employers care about is the rankings. The rankings are so competitive that even a drop in a few points of a schools average GPA or LSAT scores could cause them to fall significantly in the rankings.
Meanwhile undergrad prestige is not measured so law schools care little about this. When you only value what you measure you risk not valuing what you don't measure
Law schools have to please US News to increase their rankings, US news has to please its law students buyers to sell magazines, the law student buyers have to please the law schools to get in, its a viscous cycle!